Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke Lacrosse Alleged Rape Case Timeline
NBC Durham ^ | 7/12/06

Posted on 07/12/2006 7:56:13 PM PDT by freespirited

11 p.m. Two dancers are scheduled to arrive and work for two hours. The second dancer arrives in her own car.

11:30-to-11:39 p.m. The accuser receives four calls with no caller id.

12:00-to-12:03 a.m. Time stamped photos show two women dancing in the living room.

12:04 a.m. Time stamp photos show two dancers leaving living room.

12:05-to-12:14 a.m. Accused attacker Reade Seligmann uses his cell phone to call his girlfriend and another person.

12:19 a.m. Taxi picks up Seligmann and a friend at Watt and Urban streets, a block away from the location of the player's house.

12:26 a.m. The accuser makes a one minute phone call to Centerfold, a Durham. escort service.

12:30 a.m. approx Seligmann and his friend order food at a Cook Out restaurant. Time stamp photo shows accuser on back porch smiling with purse.

12:37 a.m. Time stamp photo shows accuser laying down on back porch with one shoe on.

12:41 a.m. Time stamp photo shows accuser being helped into the passenger seat of a car.

12:46 a.m. Seligmann uses his Duke identification card to enter his dorm.

12:53 a.m. Second dancer drives away with the accuser from the party, she call 911 to report that men shouted racial slurs.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelacrosse; dukelax; durham; falseaccusation; frumiousbandersnatch; nifong; nifongate; nifongery; runawayda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-307 next last
Unbelievable.
1 posted on 07/12/2006 7:56:17 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

It looks like someone got raped, just not the acuser


2 posted on 07/12/2006 7:59:01 PM PDT by woofie ("Romper, bomper, stomper, boo. Tell me, tell me, tell me do.Magic mirror, tell me today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

my understanding is...

dancer2 took accuser to a Kroger grocery store,
and had the police summoned, because accuser
would not get out of her car.
or something like that.

if true, what time was that,
or correct me if wrong.


3 posted on 07/12/2006 8:09:31 PM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

There isn't enough immunity in the world to protect Nifong from the logical consequences of all of this.


4 posted on 07/12/2006 8:25:24 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greasepaint

Dancer 2 (Kim Roberts/Pittman) summoned a security guard in the Kroger lot, who then called police. It was 01:20, if I recall correctly.


5 posted on 07/13/2006 4:16:03 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Yeah. I don't see how Nifong can create a timeline that would allow Seligmann to have an opportunity to commit this crime. It's just not possible.


6 posted on 07/13/2006 8:57:11 PM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

If the timeline don't fit you must aquit!!


7 posted on 07/14/2006 1:38:19 PM PDT by GoMonster (GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

"Second dancer drives away with the accuser from the party, she call 911 to report that men shouted racial slurs."

Well, it obviously wasn't Seligman (or Finnerty, for that matter) who shouted the racial slurs, since they were not present (although in the Twilight Zone that is Durham,
being in two places at the same time seems to be a regular occurance).


8 posted on 07/14/2006 4:02:18 PM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Perdogg; abb

ping


9 posted on 07/15/2006 8:07:57 AM PDT by John Galt's cousin ("Innocent until proven guilty, ..." should be: Innocent UNLESS proven guilty...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Galt's cousin; abb; Alia; AntiGuv; AmishDude; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; ...
New DUKELAX Thread Ping!!!

Thanks, John.

10 posted on 07/15/2006 9:18:31 AM PDT by Howlin (Pres.Bush ought to be ashamed of himself for allowing foreign countries right on our borders!!~~Zook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: greasepaint

About 1:20 a.m. I think.


11 posted on 07/15/2006 9:20:27 AM PDT by Howlin (Pres.Bush ought to be ashamed of himself for allowing foreign countries right on our borders!!~~Zook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Corruption! Corruption! Corruption!


12 posted on 07/15/2006 9:21:15 AM PDT by TommyDale (Stop the Nifongery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; maggief

Thanks for the ping. I posted this link on old thread.
I had just finished posting the following on old thread:



To: maggief
"The people I've come in contact with have really commended me for not getting involved in the media," he said.
There is a differene between "getting inolved in the media" and taking a leadership role.

Had he taken a leadership role, perhaps Nifong would have had a harder time grabbing the spotlight.

It was not just the rape investigation he was absent from.

His city was on the brink of a racial event. The NBP came to town. "Dead man walking" was heard when Seligman went to court.

Who is entrusted to keep the public safe during these times? Not the DA. Not the city manager. Rather the Police Department and Chalmers is the head of the DPD.

I truly do not know enough to make an honest opinion as to whether or not he is getting ready for the fallout or if he washed his hands of the sordid affair.

But it looks as if he is running scared.

More baseball games this weekend. As if my plate is not full, Duke, Israel and watching baseball in the heat.

I'll be in & out checking on both threads.


712 posted on 07/15/2006 12:29:15 PM EDT by Protect the Bill of Rights


13 posted on 07/15/2006 9:37:31 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks Howlin....


14 posted on 07/15/2006 9:42:01 AM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the Ping, Howlin!


15 posted on 07/15/2006 9:59:25 AM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks Howlin! Nothing we didn't know in this timeline. Perhaps the bigger news is that N & O actually printed it.


16 posted on 07/15/2006 10:01:05 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Duke bump


17 posted on 07/15/2006 10:18:00 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SarahUSC

And keep in mind we have not seen all the pictures from that night. There are certainly pictures with both women without clothing and I don't believe we have even had a report on the time stamps on any of those pictures.


18 posted on 07/15/2006 10:20:26 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JLS

For those who didn't see this earlier on the other thread, this is interesting. Prompted by the discussion with KenH yesterday afternoon, I did some research this morning and here's what I've found, along with the NC State Bureau of Investigation website from which the data came.

http://sbi2.jus.state.nc.us/crp/public/Default.htm

In 2005, for North Carolina, there were 1,465 arrests statewide for Prostitution and Commercial Vice. The state's population for 2005 is estimated @ 8,683,42. That's one arrest per 5,927 persons.

There were 1,800 arrests for Sex Offenses statewide for the same year. That's a ratio of one arrest per 4,824 persons.

In Durham County, there were NO ARRESTS in 2005 for Prostitution and Commercial Vice. There were nine arrests in 2004.

There were 9 arrests in Durham County for Sex Offenses in 2005, none in 2004.

Durham County's 2005 population is 242,582. That makes the ratio ONE ARREST PER 26,953 PERSONS!!

Oh, I almost forgot. ALL the arrests in 2004 and 2005 were made by the DURHAM COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT. None were made by the Durham PD or the Duke University PD.


19 posted on 07/15/2006 10:26:12 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: abb

And to give your interesting data more context, DPD was investigated and I believe found to be running prostitutes out of the police department in the mid 1990s. I would think IF I were running a department found to have been doing this in the 1990s, I would be highly skeptical that we had zero arrests in the latest reporting period.


20 posted on 07/15/2006 10:39:12 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-307 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson