Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Unbelievable.
1 posted on 07/12/2006 7:56:17 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: freespirited

It looks like someone got raped, just not the acuser


2 posted on 07/12/2006 7:59:01 PM PDT by woofie ("Romper, bomper, stomper, boo. Tell me, tell me, tell me do.Magic mirror, tell me today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

my understanding is...

dancer2 took accuser to a Kroger grocery store,
and had the police summoned, because accuser
would not get out of her car.
or something like that.

if true, what time was that,
or correct me if wrong.


3 posted on 07/12/2006 8:09:31 PM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

There isn't enough immunity in the world to protect Nifong from the logical consequences of all of this.


4 posted on 07/12/2006 8:25:24 PM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

If the timeline don't fit you must aquit!!


7 posted on 07/14/2006 1:38:19 PM PDT by GoMonster (GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; Perdogg; abb

ping


9 posted on 07/15/2006 8:07:57 AM PDT by John Galt's cousin ("Innocent until proven guilty, ..." should be: Innocent UNLESS proven guilty...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Corruption! Corruption! Corruption!


12 posted on 07/15/2006 9:21:15 AM PDT by TommyDale (Stop the Nifongery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1664171/replies?c=679

ltc and jezebelle raised an interesting possibility of what haooened to a tox screen by reviewing the AV lengthy criminal record I am not sure whether the tox report being attached to an earlier crime/probation order is sufficient to warrant it being excluded from being turned over to the defense, but it is certainly another reason for the defense to rattle Nifong's cage.

39 posted on 07/16/2006 6:02:45 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
More activity on Ruth Sheehan's Metro blog. Here's part of a comment from "Susan" on Ruth's blog from July 13, 2006 re the toxicology test--

7. He speaks double-speak. I always think I have to examine every word to decipher it. When asked in court about a toxicology report, he could have just said no toxicology tests were performed. Instead, he said there was no toxicology report available. I don't know if this means there is a toxicology report, but it's not in his office or if there is no report or something else. Pure double-speak.

-- http://blogs.newsobserver.com/ruth/index.php?title=nifong_should_he_stay_or_go&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

___________________________________________

For those who missed it, there were a couple of interesting posts re the toxicology test from the other thread--

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1664171/posts?page=615#615

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1664171/posts?page=679#679

69 posted on 07/16/2006 3:09:53 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson