I find you to be ze stinky n00b!
Posted on 03/11/2006 8:50:06 PM PST by Free_SJersey
Will someone, anyone, tell me what the story is with people, especially men, wearing toxic levels of cologne.
Do not try to lump UNNNGH! in a simple vanity, if you feel the need to do so, please start your own thread for discussion. UNNNGH! was a simple vanity. How can it be described as asnything else, or any different than this one. Why start a vanity to discuss the merits of UNNNGH! when FR policy is to discuss topics within aa thread, btw, you seem very anti-vanity
You seem to need more feedback on UNNNGH so I mentioned that you might want to start a thread for feedback. I'm done talking about UNNNGH. Go back to the 04 elections to get a real feel for UNNNGH. It reared it head quite a lot and synergized into a different life of its own.
What acronym?UNNNGH is not an acronym. Is that what you were referring to or did I miss something? You missed something. Sorry you didn't catch it, but I was referring to is the IBTZ acronym. Would it not be better to just point out the standard posting policyso it doesn't happen again than to simply type IBTZ?
I reread the last few correspondences between us and do not see a reference to the IBTZ. So before you imply I missed something please slow down and try to think faster than you type. JMO.
Oh, thanks for posting the definition of acronym, implying I didn't know what I meant!
Yo gave me no indication that you knew what it meant, our conversation was regarding UNNNGH, not IBTZ. See above post and it is a relatively simple deduction given the circumstances.
LOL, you are just so darn smart, I bow to your superior intellect! NOT!
is not going to be decided anywhere near this thread.
PS - all the blue words are your original spelling. But, your superior intelect new that. Spell check is our friend.
Sorry, my glaucoma isn't getting much better lately.
I find you to be ze stinky n00b!
#7 too funny!
K4
This thread is kind of a hoot !!!!!
I feel sorry for the person who started it, the person was viciously attacked, for really no reason.
As someone pointed out earlier in the thread, there are many things that bring about an allergic or other type reaction in some people, but it is only smoking that is being attacked.
ROTFL. Yep, you sure got him.
Confucius said: Man who pass gas in church will sit in his own pew.
May I add you to my Puff List? 
Yes it is! Thanks for the ping!!!!
PS - Toby, I'm sorry, lets fight the libs instead of amongst ourselves. I'll be saving it for the Trolls and the selfish vanity posters. :o)
Ya can't get lung cancer from cigarette smoke either.
In fact, some kinds of cologne and perfume are FAR MORE TOXIC to me than cigarette smoke.
I believe that was the subtle point the poster was attempting to make.
Keep telling yourself that.
Cigarette SMOKE does NOT cause cancer.
Cigarette SMOKE does NOT cause cancer.
However, puffing cigarettes does.
First, thank you so much for talking down to me. I treasure these moments, really - I do.
Second, you believe what you want - and I'll believe what I want. Cigarette smoke comes out of both ends of the cigarette. I believe it stinks, makes your skin look like crap and destroys your health - whichever side it comes out of... you can believe whatever you'd like.
Just don't smoke around me.
Fortunately for you, we couldn't live much farther apart and still remain in the United States, and THANK GOD for you. Cause, if you're ever in my vicinity, I'll be happy to forget my manners and be sure to light up. : )
Not in my state, you won't.
PS... threats against women is not a conservative value.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.