Replies

You can do it however you want. Be my guest. You implied the poster did something wrong by not using it. Stick to one striaght line of logic, pelase. Point was that if a vanity can get made into a thread it should have a VANITY title so people realize that it is not news related.

Do not try to lump UNNNGH! in a simple vanity, if you feel the need to do so, please start your own thread for discussion. UNNNGH! was a simple vanity. How can it be described as asnything else, or any different than this one. Why start a vanity to discuss the merits of UNNNGH! when FR policy is to discuss topics within aa thread, btw, you seem very anti-vanity

You seem to need more feedback on UNNNGH so I mentioned that you might want to start a thread for feedback. I'm done talking about UNNNGH. Go back to the 04 elections to get a real feel for UNNNGH. It reared it head quite a lot and synergized into a different life of its own.

What acronym?UNNNGH is not an acronym. Is that what you were referring to or did I miss something? You missed something. Sorry you didn't catch it, but I was referring to is the IBTZ acronym. Would it not be better to just point out the standard posting policyso it doesn't happen again than to simply type IBTZ?

I reread the last few correspondences between us and do not see a reference to the IBTZ. So before you imply I missed something please slow down and try to think faster than you type. JMO.

Oh, thanks for posting the definition of acronym, implying I didn't know what I meant!

Yo gave me no indication that you knew what it meant, our conversation was regarding UNNNGH, not IBTZ. See above post and it is a relatively simple deduction given the circumstances.

LOL, you are just so darn smart, I bow to your superior intellect! NOT!

is not going to be decided anywhere near this thread.

PS - all the blue words are your original spelling. But, your superior intelect new that. Spell check is our friend.