Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Freepers a Call to Arms! The Panty Brigade.
Ankarlo.net ^ | 03/15/05 | Daryl Ankarlo

Posted on 03/16/2005 6:28:35 AM PST by kildak

73 Pantywaisted Texas House members voted to approve HB3 on Monday night, March 13. HB3 hits small businesses and regular citizens with new and increased taxes The Republicans have charge of the Texas Legislature for the first time in a century and they voted for a HUGE NEW tax!! What are they thinking??!!

I am asking all citizens to send the Republicans (and Dems too if you want) who voted for the tax a pair of PANTIES since they proved they are sissies! (You can buy a yellow pair at Walmart for 88 cents.) Send the panties to as many BAD House members that you can afford to.

All House members (especially Republicans who voted for the tax) deserve the panties!! Let them know you think they wimped out by sending them a new selection of underwear!!! REMEMBER, THESE PEOPLE GET THE PANTIES!!!

Republicans voting 'yes'

Speaker of the House Tom Craddick; Allen, R; Anderson; Baxter; Berman; Blake; Bohac; Bonnen; Branch; Brown, B.; Brown, F.; Callegari; Campbell; Casteel; Chisum; Cook, B.; Corte; Crabb; Crownover; Davis, J.; Dawson; Denny; Driver; Eissler; Elkins; Flynn; Geren; Goodman; Goolsby; Griggs; Grusendorf; Hamilton; Hamric; Hardcastle; Hartnett; Hill; Hope; Howard; Hunter; Hupp; Isett; Jackson; Keffer, B.; Keffer, J.; King, P.; Kolkhorst; Krusee; Kuempel; Madden; Miller; Morrison; Mowery; Nixon; Orr; Otto; Phillips; Pitts; Riddle; Seaman; Smith, T.; Smith, W.; Smithee; Solomons; Straus; Swinford; Talton; Taylor; Truitt; Van Arsdale; Wong; Woolley; Zedler. Absent and not voting- Delisi; Gattis; Harper-Brown; West- send them a big 'thanks' as well.

Democrats voting 'yes'

Edwards

The House members disregarded the Will of the People and voted to keep their political careers intact by voting to RAISE and CREATE NEW TAXES instead of listening to us!! We have to let them know we are watching them!!

Now, we have to start applying the pressure to the Texas Senators who think they can get away with passing this junk legislation on to the governor for signing!

We will fight and we will WIN!

While you're thinking about it: Send a kind note or phone call to the good guys who voted AGAINST the tax. REMEMBER, THESE ARE THE GOOD GUYS--BE NICE TO THEM! These folks voted NO! (click here to determine your representative and find their contact information)

Republicans voting 'NAY' Haggerty;Heger; Jones,D; Keel; Laubenberg; McCall; Merritt; Paxton; Reyna Democrats voting 'Nay' Allen, A.; Alonzo; Anchia; Bailey; Burnam; Castro; Chavez; Coleman; Cook, R.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Dukes; Dunnam; Dutton; Eiland; Escobar; Farabee; Farrar; Flores; Frost; Gallego; Giddings; Gonzales; Gonzalez Toureilles; Guillen; Herrero; Hochberg; Hodge; Homer; Hopson; Jones, J.; King, T.; Laney; Leibowitz; Luna; Martinez; Martinez Fischer; McClendon; McReynolds; Menendez; Moreno, J.; Moreno, P.; Naishtat; Noriega, M.; Oliveira; Olivo; Peña; Pickett; Puente; Quintanilla; Raymond; Ritter; Rodriguez; Rose; Solis; Strama; Thompson; Turner; Uresti; Veasey; Villarreal; Vo.

Darrell

PS I'm kicking the idea around for a "Panty Drop-off site" Keep listening to KLIF for details.....

Finally, don't forget to let our Governor know how you feel.....

Contact Information:

contact the Governor by email

Phone and Mail information:

Office of the Governor Main Switchboard: (512) 463-2000 [office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. CST]

Citizen's Opinion Hotline: (800) 252-9600

Office of the Governor Fax: (512) 463-1849

Mailing Address Office of the Governor P.O. Box 12428 Austin, Texas 78711-2428


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: consumptiontax; propertytax; taxes; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: isthisnickcool
Don't get me wrong, I don't mind paying taxes. But until the state of Texas ejects every illegal mooching off of my hard work fromm this state and send them back to where they came from I'm going to be very negative to them raising more money from me to give away to people I should not be supporting.

I predict...some form of this "rallying call"...will become prevalent across the nation.

The congresscritters of all stripes better get on the "right" side of this too......

FRegards,

41 posted on 03/16/2005 10:31:04 AM PST by Osage Orange (Buy, go long GKIS.....................Chicken,chicken,ckicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

IF...it's all just a "wash" why do it?


42 posted on 03/16/2005 10:35:09 AM PST by Osage Orange (Buy, go long GKIS.....................Chicken,chicken,ckicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NY-YANK

Eventually.....


43 posted on 03/16/2005 10:36:36 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
The bill is revenue neutral (supposedly). Property tax relief and franchise tax elimination in exchange for some new business taxes.

The new "business" tax is an income tax. An let a former resident of Connecticut during the Weicker administration tell you that one a new income tax is imposed, no matter how small at first, it opens the door to a whole can of worms. Right now, the property tax is capped at 2.7 percent. They can't milk much more out of it w/o pissing people off. That is why they want to lower propertty taxes and shift it to taxes more easily hidden and, thus, more easily raised.

44 posted on 03/16/2005 10:43:14 AM PST by Texas Federalist (If you get in bed with the government, you'll get more than a good night's sleep." R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
IF...it's all just a "wash" why do it?

To eliminate the principal of the franchise tax which is very rough on small businesses. The payroll tax will provide the same revenue, with the burden placed more on large businesses.

I would prefer to have business taxes eliminated altogether, since they are just passed on to consumers or taken away from employees, but property tax relief is more important right now.

45 posted on 03/16/2005 10:43:27 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kildak

(You can buy a yellow pair at Walmart for 88 cents.)



Sounds like ol' Darrell spends a little time shopping the ladies department...... lol.


46 posted on 03/16/2005 10:46:35 AM PST by deport (You know you are getting older when everything either dries up or leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
The payroll tax will provide the same revenue, with the burden placed more on large businesses. . . . property tax relief is more important right now.

I'm sure you agree that taxing certain behavior discourages it. Why then, would we want to place a tax on jobs?

47 posted on 03/16/2005 10:47:48 AM PST by Texas Federalist (If you get in bed with the government, you'll get more than a good night's sleep." R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kildak

That property tax decrease is not going to make much of a difference when businesses start passing their tax increases along to the consumer.



But at least all consumers will be paying regardless of whether they own property or not..... The property owners have been taken to the cleaners long enough.

If you don't cut the taxes then at least spread them such that more people pay a share.


48 posted on 03/16/2005 10:52:01 AM PST by deport (You know you are getting older when everything either dries up or leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
I guess you can't see the big picture so just stay in "your little property tax world" 'cause I don't have the time or interest to try and explain it to anymore.
49 posted on 03/16/2005 10:54:42 AM PST by ChefKeith (Apply here to be added to the NASCAR Ping List, Daytona is done but we got 33 more races to go...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
I'm sure you agree that taxing certain behavior discourages it. Why then, would we want to place a tax on jobs?

That's not an absolute. Taxing necessities does not discourage that behavior. A tax on breathing for example would not cause mass asphyxiation.

I'm not for a payroll tax, I'm for property tax relief, and I'm willing to fight the battles one at a time.

50 posted on 03/16/2005 10:58:25 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ChefKeith
I guess you can't see the big picture so just stay in "your little property tax world" 'cause I don't have the time or interest to try and explain it to anymore.

Property taxes are eating my lunch. Consumption taxes aren't going to hurt me. Business taxes are a fight for another day.

51 posted on 03/16/2005 11:02:44 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Have you done the math and figured out how long your property taxes are going to be "reduced"?

This was no solution. Plank 4 of the state party platform spelled out the policy republican's were supposted to be running on. Sadly most of them don't feel like they are beholden to those that provided them with money, staff and votes.

52 posted on 03/16/2005 11:05:00 AM PST by Proud_texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Property taxes are eating my lunch. Consumption taxes aren't going to hurt me. Business taxes are a fight for another day.

So you want to create a new tax so you can later fight to eliminate it? Sounds like a winning plan.

53 posted on 03/16/2005 11:09:21 AM PST by Texas Federalist (If you get in bed with the government, you'll get more than a good night's sleep." R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Make sure there is a skid mark?


54 posted on 03/16/2005 11:13:05 AM PST by BJClinton (“Give me your DUmmies, your Idiots, your Leftist Wackos yearning to be sanity free.” ~PJ-Comix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton

"Make sure there is a skid mark?"

Well, the petitioners might not sign it then....


55 posted on 03/16/2005 11:20:14 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Be forewarned that watermarks have been added to this tag-line ... [hello?] ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
So you want to create a new tax so you can later fight to eliminate it? Sounds like a winning plan

If it means reducing property taxes today, yes.

56 posted on 03/16/2005 11:32:51 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Proud_texan
Have you done the math and figured out how long your property taxes are going to be "reduced"?

I can't find a "sunset" provision in HB3, so I'm not sure what you mean. The tax rate is being capped.

57 posted on 03/16/2005 11:39:59 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
If it means reducing property taxes today, yes.

Just so everyone understands where you're coming from - would you support a 1.1% income tax, instead of a "business" tax, if it meant reducing property taxes today.

58 posted on 03/16/2005 11:51:27 AM PST by Texas Federalist (If you get in bed with the government, you'll get more than a good night's sleep." R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
Just so everyone understands where you're coming from - would you support a 1.1% income tax, instead of a "business" tax, if it meant reducing property taxes today.

No. We don't have an income tax. We already have a business tax called the franchise tax, they are just changing the cricumstances (closing loopholes) under which they collect it.

59 posted on 03/16/2005 11:58:27 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kildak

I like this idea

Maybe we can do this on a National Level to get our representatives in the Senate to live up to their Constitutional Duties and Confirm in a straight up vote, GWB's Judicial Noms.


60 posted on 03/16/2005 12:00:10 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson