Posted on 12/18/2020 5:15:11 PM PST by Lenora Thompson
You hear some awfully funny things online. On Monday, we heard a benediction pronounced after the Michigan Electors committed treason. Later, while Texas was casting their Electoral Votes, we heard mention of Chief Justice Roberts screaming at his fellow SCOTUS judges.
No! Say it cannot be! Judges are above politics. Irreproachable. Job security for life. Independent.
Or are they!? The source of the intel is an unnamed clerk in the Supreme Court of the United States who heard-what-he-heard last Friday when the Justices retired to deliberate on whether or not to take Texas' case against the embattled states so obviously riddled with election fraud.
Usually deliberations are quiet and professional, sometimes conducted telephonically. But given the gravity of the situation, the Justices chose to deliberate face-to-face on Friday.
Fireworks ensued!
Chief Justice John Roberts could be plainly heard from the down the hall screaming, "Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?"
Now, like you, I labor under the delusion that, like the blindfolded statuary of Lady Justice that Trey Gowdy is so fond of talking about, our SCOTUS justices are also blind. We expect them to apolitical.We depend on them ruling upon law alone regardless of the headlines, current events or personal cost to themselves, their families or even the nation.
Well, it's a nice theory anyways. Sometimes it actually works that way.
Roberts was also overheard to say, "Don’t tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren’t dealing with riots then...You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don’t want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote.”
Odd language from a man who was involved with the Bush/Gore thing himself in 2000 as were Kavanaugh and Barrett. At least we know Barrett and Kavanaugh tried.
Justice Clarence Thomas responded to Justice Roberts' scream by calmly saying, "This will end be the end of democracy, John."
Conspicuous by its absence is anything you'd expect a Justice to have good reason to scream about, like, oh I dunno: THE CONSTITUTION.
There's been a rumor afoot for a very long time that I've never wanted to think about, let alone research, and I still don't. But Justice Roberts' alleged outburst on Friday makes it necessary. My friend "Gen Z Conservative" has done an excellent job researching this rumor for his article Is It True that Chief Justice John Roberts Visited Epstein’s Island?
Here's what he had to say:
"...what we do know is that Epstein brought famous and influential individuals to his island and had ample evidence with which he could blackmail them. One of those individuals might have been Chief Justice Roberts; it does look like Justice John Roberts visited Epstein’s island and could have been blackmailed to make bad SCOTUS decisions.
To determine who visited “pedo island,” one key piece of evidence has been the flight log. For example, a flight log from 2009 showed that Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Naomi Campbell visited the island. You might remember that Kevin Spacey was accused of harassing a minor and there is ample evidence that Clinton and Prince Andrew also had inappropriate relations with minors."
Now, one interesting name on that list is a John Roberts. Here is what Lin Wood had to say about the idea that John Roberts visited Epstein’s island and was on the flight manifest:
"A 'John Roberts' flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet on at least two occasions."
The fact that Lin Wood put his personal and professional reputation on the line with this daring tweet tells me there's fire, not merely smoke.
The timing of his tweet is fascinating too: June 29th, 2020.
Justice Roberts had been hospitalized on June 21st for a injury to his head that left him covered in blood.
Cause? Well, first they went all seizure about it because he supposedly suffered a seizure in 1993 and again in 2007, but then they blamed it on that oldie-but-goodie catch-all excuse: dehydration. Uh-huh. It's interesting to note that the accident came, according to Yahoo! Money, "eight days before [Roberts] sided with liberal justices to strike down a Louisiana law restricting who can perform abortions. The chief justice has sided with liberals on a slew of rulings recently."
A lot of people are beginning to seriously wonder if Roberts is compromised. What if he was on Pedo, I mean, Epstein Island? There is a photograph that seems to confirm that the "John Roberts" in the flight log may actually be John Roberts the judge.
If so, is he being blackmailed? Since 2013, rumors that something was "off" about the adoption of Roberts' two Irish children have led to suspicions of blackmail. Then the Epstein thing came along.
I also wonder if his head wound may've been from being physically attacked? (Think Mitch McConnell!)
He could be blackmailed. He might've been biffed. But what about bribes?
Copious Mel (@LtlM55) on Twitter has tracked his net worth going up, up, up. Her data comes from OpenSecrets.org which I checked fastidiously. I verified we are indeed talking about THAT John G. Roberts. And yes, his personal finances did increase precipitously, rather like ballots for Joe Biden in the wee hours of 11/4.
That's mighty fine kale for a man who makes $277,700 per year with a raise of only $2,000-3,000 each year. And no, the wife's income can't explain it either.
L. Lin Wood said it best in his tweets yesterday: "We The People are entitled to answers. You work for us, Justice Roberts."
They just responded.
Thank You! The world is so on edge that even a pastor used heresay of heresay to start this story on a blog and somehow it managed to gain national attention with a republican congresssman repeating it.
No, DumbA, the flight log shows that a John Roberts did fly on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane
‘
The guy is compromised and everyone in Power ignores the obvious.
‘
‘
Yeah, but very strange that the sharks have no interest in the floating whale.
The Media thinks so little of the Public, there’s no accountability.
Roberts has more assets than people know. Multiple residences. We won’t get the real info.
‘
As far as I can tell (and I’d never heard of ‘Hal Turner’) it was reported on the Turner website, but not purported to be FROM him. It’s purported to be from an SC clerk. (It’s also reported on the Epoch Times, but they’ve suddenly started charging for access, so I couldn’t read that.)
I don’t have any faith in a Justice who would slime his way into approving O’Care, so I don’t find this new accusation difficult to believe. In a position like his, once you cave and sacrifice all credibility, you’re done for good in the minds of honest people.
I will never believe anything that comes from Roberts’ mouth or pen. There’s something hinky going on there - and I didn’t need this recent story to believe that.
The House can impeach them and 2/3 of the Senate can convict them.
Does a bear tinkle in the woods? (I cleaned it up for this forum)
My educated guess? I think he is gay.
Someone's been blackmailing him with compromising photos from when he was younger. and living a gay lifestyle.
Of course, he is married and has young children so he wouldn't want them to find out.
And then "President Joe Biden" would promptly name his replacement, tapping a young Marxist for the job.
Nominating faux "originalists" to the Supreme Court has consequences.
Thank you, this writer is a drama queen.
Seriously, LOL. A rat House would probably love to impeach Roberts so Biden could replace.
Would you want your Senator to convict or not? LOL LOL LOL. Not actually laughing just LOL.
“Justices can be removed.”
What is the method?
“The House can impeach them”
In other words, they aren’t going anywhere. Disturbing.
Post the log then........
If not then please post the correct one........
https://preview.redd.it/pmxnfduelib51.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=b116a68e6441b684e49a4124bebf952d43a110e4
Sorry, I’m not tech savvy, however I can recognize a flight logbook when I see one.
So unfortunately I cannot provide you with that detail that I surely recall seeing.
And of course not saying that the John Roberts listed is CJ JR but it is there.
It may be, it’s been a while. Why?
Its not chief justice roberts. It has been debunked. L lin wood could have easily debunked it before putting his reputation on the line.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.