Posted on 11/08/2020 4:56:15 AM PST by PJ-Comix
I'm not a lawyer, just a verrrry interested layman. Obviously I have been following very closely the obvious election fraud on a massive scale that just took place. However, setting aside the data proving the fraud, just the legal issues alone should give Trump the win.
On October 19, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberals on the Supreme Court and voted to allow the decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision, CONTRARY TO STATE LAW, to allow the counting of mailed ballots up to three days after election day. The vote was 4-4 at the time due to a vacancy on the Supreme Court, thus allowing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in VIOLATION OF STATE LAW to remain in place.
Did you notice that I emphasized "VIOLATION OF STATE LAW?" That is because the 2020 election in Pennsylvania was conducted in VIOLATION OF STATE LAW.
As Daniel Horowitz and Mark Levin pointed out, State Legislatures can choose presidential electors. There has been a lot of push back and "fact checking" on this to declare that they are wrong. Well, they are wrong. State Legislators cannot choose a slate of electors contrary to the recorded vote...EXCEPT when the election was conducted in VIOLATION OF STATE LAW.
Thanx to Justice Roberts not taking a stand on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, that state went ahead and openly counted mailed ballots three days (and beyond) after the Nov. 3 election in VIOLATION OF STATE LAW.
Therefore if the state legislature of Pennsylvania, in response to the overwhelming evidence of vote fraud plus the slap in the face the governor, his administration, and the state courts gave to the legislature by ACTING IN VIOLATION OF STATE law choose the the electors they have the legal right to do so. Of course, the state Democrat Secretary of State will not certify the electors chosen by the state legislature and will only certify the electors chosen due to a fraudulent election conducted in VIOLATION OF STATE LAW.
So which set of electors get to vote in the electoral college? Well, I think you see where this is heading and, yup, it is heading to the U.S. Supreme Court where despite their reluctance to get involved in election matters they have no choice but to do so. However, rather than get involved in analyzing election data which could take a long time, their concern is strictly legal. And it boils down to this, do the state legislatures have the constitutional right to choose the electors if the election was conducted in VIOLATION OF STATE LAW?
The answer for Pennsylvania is obvious.
p.s. This principle also applies to MI and WI.
I thought it was Alito, not the Dreaded Traitor Roberts who ordered the ballots segregated.
the Constitution is clear. ==> Art1 Sec4 Clause1.
But “Judge” Roberts (Epstein Island, trafficked children)
does not actually READ the Law (e.g. ObamaCARE),
but lies from his Throne of Blackrobes
... to destroy America.
Roberts (Epstein Island to SCOTUS) is a PROVEN liar
who directs corrupt “judges” much more interested in porn
for federal workers DURING WORK, than clean water
or Truth.
As far as i know it was Alito. PA never responded to the first request and the second request for those ballots was due yesterday at 2PM and there’s been no word.
To Georgia, too
Right but what I am talking about here is the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT of the State legislature to choose the electors if there was a VIOLATION of state election law.
How to go for it...CRIMINAL BALLOTING
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSuFRLEYbDg
watch it all
Even RED STATES require an AUDIT-not a recount
It will come down to the electors doing the right thing or not. Trump was up over 700K on election night; which got whittled down every day until the democrats manufactured eneough fraud to pull ahead.
The PA GOP should be RIOTING right now; by not supporting the President, they are allowing PA voters to be robbed.
Again, I am emphasizing the BIGGER issue of whether the state legislature has the right to choose the electors IF state law has been violated which it obviously has by the Pennsylvania courts, governor, sec of state, and state agencies acting in VIOLATION of ESTABLISHED STATE ELECTION LAWS.
No, the Alito ruling was on a different matter, subsequent to Roberts ruling when SCOTUS was first addressed.
Two separate decisions. Justice Alito’s order was unilateral. The other decision was from that 4-4 split.
The case was sent by the Legislators of PA a few months ago. Roberts joined the Lib Commies In a 4-4 tie it got sent back to the State. So now when it comes back to the court, hopefully 5-4 with Amy Comes Barret
It was Alito - but the topic of this thread was what transpired before election day. That’s when Roberts decided it was OK for PA to break it’s own laws in order to steal the election.
Yes Alito ordered segregated ballots, but that had nothing to do with Roberts vote.
Also, was it PA that put off counting military absentee ballots till the very end so there was a big stack still to count?
Totally different issue. The 4-4 decision he is talking about was before the election. Alito’s order to separate the votes was actually a day or 2 after election day.
The law doesn’t mean a Damn thing to these commies. They feel that won and have a right to the whole enchilada. If we want to be free then get ready to bleed.
Quite possible. 8>) We know he certainly didn’t do it with the forethought of helping President Trump. 8>)
the electors are not going to change the votes of their populace...clinton supporters pinned their hopes on that four years ago. Won’t happen.
Two edge sword here. If Roberts (or Alito, whoever it was) voted the right way and prevented days of vote manufacturing, PA would have been Trump’s on election night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.