Posted on 10/12/2020 4:50:41 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
When youve lost Jake Tapper, youve lost control of the narrative. The Biden/Harris Harris/Biden campaign lost control of the narrative over packing the Supreme Court over the weekend. It obviously wont last long, because their pals in the news media wont allow it to do so, but Sunday was fun nonetheless.
Here is Mr. Tapper, actually having a moment of journalistic integrity with the Deputy Campaign Manager for the Biden/Harris Harris/Biden disinformation campaign, Kate Bedingfield:
Tapper began by pointing out that Biden, who had previously said that adding justices to the Supreme Court was a bonehead idea, was suddenly unwilling to answer the question.
Biden opposes adding more justices to the Supreme Court, he has for decades, so why he is refusing to weigh in on it now? Tapper asked.
Because Donald Trump and the Republicans dont get to set the terms of this debate, Bedingfield replied, arguing that the question was a play to distract voters while they rushed the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.
Its not the Trump people who invented this question, right? Tapper asked. The idea of adding justices to the Supreme Court came from the progressive side of the Democratic Party. Its a simple question. He has long been against adding justices to the the court. Has he changed his mind or does he have the same position hes had since 1983?
Bedingfield pivoted again, saying again that it was an attempt by Republicans to distract from a nominee who would likely change the balance of the court. That Vice President Mike Pence had pushed the issue of court packing at last weeks debate was further proof of that, she concluded.
This is a simple its a simple question and its one frankly that Trump did not invent, Tapper pushed back, saying again that the notion of court packing had originally come from progressives in the Democratic Party. I thought odd when Vice President Biden said the other day in response to a reporters question that voters do not deserve an answer on this. Of course, voters deserve an answer on his position on every issue.
But we are not going to play their game, Bedingfield insisted. He has given an answer. He has answered the question. He has probably answered this question 15 times over the course of the last week. The answer is I am not going to play Donald Trumps game. I am not going to allow the terms of this debate to shift to a hypothetical that assumes, by the way, that we, the Democrats, are going to lose here. That is really that is what at the core of this argument they are making. It assumes we are going to lose. Vice President Biden does not accept that. He does not accept that.
I think a serious policy question is not a game and I dont think its Trumps game, but Kate Bedingfield, we always appreciate you coming on the show and answering the questions or deftly side-stepping them, Tapper gave up, ending the segment. Thank you. Appreciate it.
[End]
If youre expecting Tapper to now bulldog this issue like he would if he was chasing a Republican, you should probably think again. Tapper has now done his pretend journalist-y thing, and will move immediately on to some other topic that is more favorable to Biden. That will allow Tapper to continue getting invited to all the nice cocktail parties in the DC Swamp. Because thats how all of this works.
As I pointed out yesterday, Biden/Harris Harris/Biden obviously do plan to pack the court if they are elected. If they had no such plan, they would say so. Both of these people were selected by the Democrat power brokers for their willingness to do or say anything the radical left tells them to do and say. The radical left demands the court be packed, because that is the only way its plan to create a communist utopia in America can succeed.
Thus, Biden/Harris Harris/Biden will pack the court.
The only way to avoid that outcome is to re-elect Donald J. Trump. Simple.
Think this isnt an important election? Think again. Check out the names on Joe Bidens short list for Attorney General:
The mass-killer of senior citizens Governor of New York; a former acting AG who was a participant in a coup detat on American soil; and a pathetic loser who has no real legal gravitas at all. Thats the list for AG. Its almost enough to make you long for the days of Janet Reno.
Holy crap.
Pandemic? What pandemic? I guess the Los Angeles Lakers must have closed out the low-rated NBA finals last night. So, how did the teams fans celebrate? Why, by staging a mass gathering at the Staples Center and tossing rocks and bottles at police officers:
Love how the corrupt reporter describes the scene as mostly peaceful. Orwellian.
There is only one real question about the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation. Shes been confirmed by the senate before, just 3 years ago. She is extremely well-qualified for the job, and everyone knows it. Absent some major scandal, her ultimate confirmation along the schedule Lindsey Graham has laid out is a fait accompli.
The only real question related to the hearings that begin today is, what fake scandal will the Democrats and their hand-maidens in the media concoct in an effort to try to derail Judge Barrett? Until we know that, the hearings themselves will be just a posturing, demagoguery opportunity for the Democrat members of the Judiciary Committee, including Kamala Harris, who began her disgusting posturing over the weekend by notifying Graham that she will participate remotely because its just too darn dangerous for her to show up in person.
What will that fake scandal be? Who knows? But you know something is in the works, and, with the committees process scheduled to end on Thursday, it will most likely break over next weekend in an effort to extend the committee process and thus delay the full senate vote.
So the timing is predictable. As for the nature of the inevitable smear, we will just have to wait and see what these evil people make up.
Stay tuned.
That is all.
They’ve already announced it.
Zac whatshisface helpfully suggested that Trump will take away ppl’s healthcare in the midst of a pandemic, and if you vote to confirm ACB then you are complicit in that.
She won't answer that question, characterizing it as: a hypothetical that assumes, by the way, that we, the Democrats, are going to lose here.
What??
not clear who is he referring to ?
Cuomo.
Theyve been developing the ACB narrative since before Kavanaugh, as she has always been on the short, short list. Wasnt the democrats big gun, Avenatti, released from prison over china flu concerns? Will Avenatti be back in the limelight or will the dems rely on more accomplished liars, dem politicians, to do the dirty work?
I think Tapper has a calendar with a 90-120 day reminder to ask real questions. This way if he pushes a hard question to a leftist once every 3-4 months, he can point to a relatively recent example of challenging a progressive when his bias and integrity is called into question.
But she has no problem showing up at "rallies" on the campaign trail.
Those “rallies” aren’t dangerous, because there’s nobody there.
LOL, you're probably right!
Biden campaign:
We’re not going to play the voters’ game of telling them what our super secret positions are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.