Zillions of Fake Trump-Troll Twitter/FB/Forum Accounts Popping Up Left-and-Right

Reaganite Republican ^ | 22 February 2016 | Reaganite Republican

[Reaganite Republican]

He's definitely thorough -and thoroughly devious- I'll give him that.

But besides apparently buying-out apparently Breitbart, (aka 'Trumpbart' lol) Trump is now unleashing wave-after-wave of online trolls to attack every single pro-Cruz post...
and twirl their virtual pom-poms in your face.

They are very easy to spot, tho- 20 - 100 followers, lame sunset or some such background they found in 5 seconds, one 'character' trait like 'I'm a trucker', and typically a profile photo that looks like a model or some other 'winner'.

And they always link Trump's own twitter account on EVERY thread... apparently getting paid per post. It's obvious they all work of the same list of talking points- when challenged in-depth, they don't seem to really understand anything but the basics... like anybody's first week on the job, I guess.

They all seem to have an assigned character, usually are anchored to a specific issue/block of voters... 'Jews for Trump', Trump-Texas, whatever. There were a bunch of Iowa/NH/SC characters on there lately -who all have disappeared- only to be replaced by a whole slew of new ones throughout Dixie today.

I've had one assigned to my website, and one to my FB page... both of which attacked pro-Cruz posts at any hour of the day or night until I blocked them.

They also jam all online polls for Trump- thus, he polls 65-85% after every debate, yet pulls a weak 32.5% when he scores his 'big win'- hardly what you might call dominating.

And they love to tell you how the race is all but over when Trump has merely 
70 of the 1257 delegates required to win the nomination- please.

These trolls always engage politely in a transparent -and brief- 
charm offensive, but it doesn't take much resistance before they start telling me what an idiot I am... and in terms that would make even The Donald blush (picture a darker orange or perhaps cinnamon color).

They also work in teams... if I get into it with one of them before I notice it's a fake-looking account, 2-3 others promptly appear to lynch me/chant in unison.

Some pathetic efforts at acting can be seen as well, of Facebook, twitter, even on Free Republic these days. Some pose as 'disillusioned' Cruz fans, others say they were 'never for Trump' and they're Christian and/or conservative and will be 'glad to support him' in the general.

That's because the Trump campaign knows perfectly well there are legions of conservatives so astonished by a GOP primary that could nominate a lifelong liberal and potential tyrant that we just might stay home if he's foisted upon us.

I would hate to do it -held my nose and voted for Romney last time- but Trump is simply not acceptable to large swathes of the voting public. And numbers bear this out, regardless of how loud he and his trolls/supporters shout at us.

[higgmeister]

What the heck is a deadpooler? I even googled it and saw no definition.

Only an idiot would think anyone voting for Trump would need to be paid. I would pay Trump to be allowed to vote for him.

[The Iceman Cometh]

BULL-BUTTER!! I made no such claim. I listed 17 accounts that I have noticed as trump supporters who all had relatively recent (incident to this election season) FR sign-up dates. That is a *factual* observation and I even added: "...Make of it what you will..." and immediately followed-up with the disclaimer that I had no idea if they were paid posters or not.

I guess you will never understand how wrong it is to call out people with veiled accusations in a public forum.

Not insulting you, not smearing you.

Just pointing out from an etiquette standpoint that you are wrong in what you did IMO.

No need for your hysterics. You're the one having a fight with yourself. Carry on....

[datura]

I didn’t compare Trump to Reagan as individuals. I compared their antagonist’s smears against both of them.

Your reading comprehension suffers - as I’ve noticed in prior encounters with you. Cruz’s tax plan in particular.

Having said that, I find any discussion with you to be pointless.

[hal ogen]

If I told you once, I've told you a quadzillion bazillion quintazillion times: DON'T EXAGGERATE!!!

[Roman_War_Criminal]

LOL!

Smells like desperation

[Jewbacca]

Trump will no more make the USA than Maduro makes Venezuela strong or Erogan makes Turkey strong.

He’s a corrupt liberal who will follow corrupt liberal policies, but in a loud brassy manner.

[eyedigress]

Is that really possible? Zillions?

_____________________________________

I think that is less than Brazillions.

[XenaLee]

I never claimed that you were comparing Trump to Reagan “as individuals”, now did I? You are, however, trying to paint Trump as a victim as Reagan was by the rabid leftist media. The rabid leftist media is attacking anyone on the right or anyone, like Trump, that is pretending to be on the right.

“And sorry, but....your lame attempt to compare Trump to Reagan here is just stupid.”

And as for the discussion being pointless, then why oh why are you always ‘right there’ doing it? You started in on the discussion with me, remember.

But yeah, I admit that sparring with Trump supporters is pointless, as proven here already over the past week. So here’s a thought. Don’t start in on us anti-Trump posters and you won’t have to worry about that “”pointless”” issue henceforth, eh?

[jaydee770]

"...how wrong it is to call out people with veiled accusations in a public forum..."

Bull-Butter!! I've made *NO* accusations veiled or otherwise and specifically posted a disclaimer that I've pointed out to you *and* which you so far refuse to acknowledge. I merely used publicly available info that anyone could note the same as I did. No better place than a public forum for that publicly available info.

But we do appreciate your demonstrating here in this public forum, proving once again for all here to see, that trump-pets like yourself seemingly can't help yourselves from following the example set by your beloved candidate and feel compelled to smear, insult and argue with folks about a post that you were never involved with in the first place.

Or in meme form, you've proven the following now for five posts (and counting), still unable to find the personal integrity to apologize for your smears. Will you make it six posts? Let's find out!

[Robert DeLong]

We each have our opinions.

[DivineMomentsOfTruth]

Exactly.. That has been my experience as well.. Cruz Critters came pouring out to the woodwork last month.. and man are they mean!

[husky ed]

"yet pulls a weak 32.5% when he scores his 'big win"

Cruz/Rubio can't score above 23% in their big 'wins'. What a joke.

Okay, where's the next nut with their crazy diatribe?

Ed

[tefis]

I’ve been here since 1998. I support Trump. Just to be clear, I don’t TrusTed. I think he’s a shrewd, self-serving, Harvard educated, first term senator with a CFR, Goldman Sacs wife who’s had his eye on the WH since before he ran for senate, hiding behind Christ and the constitution for political advantage.

And to think I could have been paid for what just I gladly did for free! Wooo hooo!

[Albion Wilde]

They just can’t believe the breath and depth of grassroots anger. So it has to be “trolls.”

[Company Man]

Doesn’t even need the caption at this point.

[Company Man]

The rest of them? They're RNC plants. If they can make me hate Cruz people, I won't vote Cruz if Trump falters. If they can make you hate Trump people, you won't vote Trump if your candidate fails. It's a coordinated psyops campaign

[JimRed]

And they always link Trump's own twitter account on EVERY thread... apparently getting paid per post.

I need beer money; where do I sign up?

[jaydee770]

“...I’ve been here since 1998...”

Sooo... you wouldn’t be included in the batch of *RECENT* FR sign-ups (which the post was about), now would you? Or do you consider yourself a trump supporter who only *RECENTLY* signed up for an FR account, despite your 1998 vintage? I’m trying to understand why a trump-pet who doesn’t fit the description would feel the need to inject themselves as a party to a post that does not pertain to them? A trump-esque narcissistic-ego perhaps?

[Fresh Wind]

Just the words “Aw Jeez...” are enough!

[tefis]

Ewwww, that was a wee bit shrill! I was simply pointing out that there are plenty of Trump supporters that are longtime Freepers. So sorry that you don’t feel it was my right to post on this thread but I felt the thread absolutely pertained to me based on the erroneous claim that Trump posters were either newbies or paid trolls.

Member since July 24,1998