Posted on 11/07/2014 12:07:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
1994 ought to have brought freedom entirely, but that never happened. We never got Polygamy freedom.
President Zuma has indeed proven that Polygamy can be practised in South Africa. President Zuma has been married at least five times. We now have to ask why South Africans opted to have selective freedom?
Marriage can be by capture, by purchase or by choice. Obviously the majority would agree with me that marriage by choice is the favorable, however some broke men would definitely opt for Marriage by capture. Why would the majority opt for Marriage by choice, obviously they can easily hide behind Marriage by choice as it is acceptable and seems as if, it has nothing to do with purchase. Lobola is purchase. You date a girl, you purchase. You have no Persal/Employee Number you can't purchase and you can be lonely for the rest of your life, who cares.
In short the marriage by choice favours the Caucasian men as money is in abundance to them, whilst most of African men have none. The church also has a role in this, as it promotes monogamous marriages. The one who has the most money get the most beautiful girl.
The truth must be told, African men are demanding their freedom to love as many women as they want. We need to do away with the Apartheid/Colonial thinking that dictates that polygamy is wrong. People must be free to practice polygamy with those who are comfortable too. Let the monogamous do their own thing and not dictate on polygamists on what is acceptable when it comes to their choice of multiple partners.
The truth must be told, men do not cheat because they do not love their wives, but they cheat because that is what they want to do. They want to love as many women as possible. Senzo Meyiwa, obviously believed in polygamy and he could not practice his choice. Why is that?
We need a Julius Malema, a champion to win us polygamy freedom. Polygamy must be made legal in South Africa, not only for cultural marriages.
Coming soon to an Obamanation near you.
A South African judge, transplanted to Mass.,
suggested to Mr. ROmneyCARE that he impose
his last change of marriage. And he eagerly did.
I can’t see Obama taking on another wife...... Another Reggie maybe but never another wife.
Really, why stop at homosexuality? Wouldn’t polygamy and incest laws have to be abolished too?
Reminds me of a line from MST3K: “McMillan and wife, and wife, and wife...”
Wow is right.
A beacon of barbarian tribalism there
I need to raise money for a trip to South Korea and a big net.
/s
It makes financial sense, too, since the government punishes legally married people with higher taxes.
This Caucasian man would beg to differ with the abundance of money fantasy, a fantasy I might add, that is apparently shared by our own Obunga.
What if people want to marry Beasts?
I mean Disney has been pushign that agenda for a LONG time!
Exactly.
And polygyny...women taking multiple husbands...and new family configurations of six men...three women (gotta accommodate the bisexuals)...
Our ObamaNation & the Democrats have declared such war upon marriage that they've convinced others than even a single partner is mere arbitrary "tradition"
communists and liberaltarians would love all of that.
Yup.
Put a firm one child limit on ADC benefits and the sound of knees locking together would sound like thunder.
You might want to head south to the Philippines instead.
I asked my priest about that. He said he was legally forbidden from marrying us without the state license.
"Separation of Church and State" needs to start cutting both ways as well.
very poosible
>>”Separation of Church and State”
What does Romans 1:25+ say about the consequences of State establishments of religion / religiously established states — where the state establishment becomes a created object of mandatory worship?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.