Why Sarah Palin Will Win in 2012

HillBuzz ^ | 3/10/10 | rae4palin

[rae4palin]

She’s operating a fully-formed multimedia strategy designed to counter Dr. Utopia’s razzle dazzle and media darling status. She knows in her heart Americans will want a true conservative in office in 2012, one who is smart enough to focus on jobs, the economy, energy independence, and limited government instead of allowing the media to degenerate the debate into social issues. The media is going to do everything it can to control the debate in 2012, doing its level best to hand Dr. Utopia a second term on a silver platter.

The ONLY Republican we see on the field who can take charge of the debate is Palin.

[meadsjn]

Can Palin win? Please reassure me Palin supporters.

The article and link at the top of this thread is from HillBuzz, a Hillary site. Reassure yourself by going to the link and reading the article, and the comments following.

[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

Nixon winner, GHWB winner, Taft winner, Ike winner, Lincoln winner, Johnson winner.

Nixon, GHWB and Johnson had been Vice President, generally considered an executive office. William H. Taft had served in the cabinet (Robert Taft was a loser). Ike was a general like most presidents in the late 19th century. I will give you Lincoln, the only superior ex-legislative candidate.

[meadsjn]

Yeah, credencials [it's spelled "credentials"] be damned! If you're not a celebrity, you're not qualified to hold the highest office in the land.

If you can't get votes, you can't win.

Remember President Bob Dole? It was Bob Dole's turn. Bob Dole lost to the (at that time) most corrupt Democrat president in history. Bob Dole didn't care. It was Bob Dole's turn to be the RNC nominee. Bob Dole couldn't get any votes, but by God, Bob Dole was the nominee. Bob Dole wasn't about to let any conservative take his turn. Bob Dole lost big time. And America lost.

Then it was John McCain's turn to be the RNC nominee, MY FRIENDS. It was his turn. Blah, Blah, Blah. America lost big time.

Then it was Mitt Romney's turn to be the RNC nominee. WTF?

[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

Dukakis loser. Carter loser. Dewey loser. Stevenson loser.

Dukakis, Carter and Dewey lost to other governors. Stevenson lost to a five star general. In other words, of all your examples, only Lincoln was a valid example of your point.

[MadAboutPalin]

Piper’s closing words at her swearing in as President on
January 20, 2041:

Everything I am today, I owe to my mother, who has stepped down
after 7 successive terms as President of this great country,
carrying every state, in every one of those elections.
Her record will remain unbroken in this century, and every century
to follow.

And my mother has stepped down against the entreaties of the whole nation,
of her own volition, and in keeping with the principles she
expounded, when she stepped down as Alaska’s Governor in 2009.
And I believe she is bestowed with divine energy that has kept
her going for so long, and against all odds. That energy will keep
her going for many more decades.

So, I am today taking charge as your new President, aware that the
real President is Sarah Palin and will continue to be, as long as she
lives. Amen.

[GregB]

The antipalinbots will be after you...

[MadAboutPalin]

Those loonies?
What, me worry?

[GregB]

I have to watch what I say I might hurt pissant’s feelings. Shame on us Sarah Palin supporters for being mean to those who don't want her to be elected or the ones who say she is not qualified. I looked in The Constitution and according to it she can run!!!

[MadAboutPalin]

You are more likely to offend someone if you are defensive about it.

[GregB]

Yes I need to ignore them and focus on getting Sarah elected. Thanks.

[jla]

It's nothing short of amazing how some of you can look at a six year old girl and see that one day she will be our President.
Why anyone would think you to be off your rockers is beyond me.

[MadAboutPalin]

Ever hear about genetic inheritance?
Thought so...

[neefer]

Yes, I do remember Bob Dole. I always viewed him as the sacrificial lamb because everyone knew how poplar Clinton was. Being corrupt was cool. When I was in the workforce and the Internet bubble burst, I realized in retrospect the ‘90s were “good times.” Let’s compare the incumbent Democrats of 1996 to 2012. Regardless of his no-tie look, Barry will never be Slick Willy. He doesn’t have the great economy nor does he have the political mind of Clinton. Barry is very beatable. Therefore your agrument that Dole was lame is, well, lame.

The reason I argue against Palinbots on these threads is that they drown out any political discussion of another candidate THREE YEARS before the race. If they don’t shut up, other conservative “nobodies” with c-r-e-d-e-n-T-i-a-l-s will remain nobodies.

I was on fire for Sarah when she first made the national scene. But the more I see of her, the more I think that Palinbots have put her on too high of a pedestal. God bless her for her pro-life work and other accomplishments. But she is not presidential material at this point in time. I don’t want to be like Obama supporters, willing to pin my hopes on a charismatic candidate who shares my ideals but is young and inexperienced. My feelings toward Palin are very uncertain and less than impressed with her political shrewdness. She’s hasn’t’ reached “Thatcher-dom“ in my mind‘s eye. I'm hoping I'm wrong because Palinbots are many and she'll probably win the nomination.

[neefer]

including some pretty good ones And some that were average at best. If we’re citing success of Presidents who lacked executive experience before office, let’s not forget to analyze the current president who seems to be letting his lack of experience show. Unlike Palin supporters, I’m not willing to pin all my hopes on someone with less of a career, hoping that she‘ll turn out to be Calvin Coolidge. Just because she shares my ideals doesn’t mean she has the political shrewdness to make those ideals reality.

Except for Kennedy, everyone on that list was older. Some where much older, having far more life experience than Palin will have in 2012. She’s never been an army general and so I'd have to disagree. And none of them were so deeply hated (except for Lincoln later in office). Sarah Palin herself admitted that she underestimated the deep seething hatred leftist had for her.

To me, Sarah Palin is an uncertain, very risky and volatile candidate who, if she does reach the Presidency, will have to waste much of it defending herself. That gives me great unease considering her political adversaries successfully forced her to resign as Governor.

[NavyCanDo]

I would suggest reading her book. She has more political shrewdness needed to get things done than most people realize.

[rae4palin]

after 7 successive terms as President

LOL

[inglorious_basterd]

These Palin haters are just as irritating as the Ronulans, and it seems they’ve taken over too.
<———Daily Kos is that way, okay?

[unseen1]

yeah because the bush family the clinton family, the kennedy family, the chenney’s can not possibly have any people in it that as children grew up learning the trade. What we are saying when we cite Piper is that the Palin family has become a new political family that will most likely continue to have political power for generations.

Those who hope Palin’s 15 min will end soon are in for a big disappointment. We are seeing the emergence of a new political family dynasty IMO.

[unseen1]

that’s because the biggest haters of Palin are Ronulans and Rmney supporters. each camp sees Palin taking voters from their camps. Palin takes away Paul’s fiscal conservative and Romney’s “next in line” voters to a large degree. Palin has what those two have without the negatives of being a crank and a nobody.

So they rightly see Palin has the biggest threa tto their “man’s” ability to win and thus attack her.