JUDGE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES! JUST NOT...

jaghunters ^ | 9/22/2009 | jaghunters

[rxsid]

"JUDGE ROYCE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES OF FRAUD AND TREASON! JUST NOT IN LAMBERTH'S COURT

JAG HUNTER HERE:

Judge Royce C. Lamberth grants permission for any recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse (present) SOETORO-OBAMA on criminal charges of TREASON and FRAUD!

Judge Lamberth has also vetted the Super Grand Jury presentment for TREASON and FRAUD, found the formal accusations meritorious, and will allow them filed formaly in his criminal court.

Judge Lamberth's singular objection is that the Super Grand Jury approached the federal criminal court in the District of Columbia. Not recognized in Judge Lamberth's District Court, the Judge stated the Super Grand Jury lacked standing in the District of Columbia.

Proofs and evidences Judge Lamberth allowed filed in the Federal Court for the District of Columbia are available for use by any criminal court in the United States.

Judge Lamberth is correct that government prosecutors do enjoy discretion in the prosecution of many criminal cases.

However, the command of a Grand Jury to a prosecutor by way of presentment strips that prosecutor of the authority to refuse to bring the Grand Jury's decided, formal criminal accusation before the Petite Jury in a criminal court.

Judge Lamberth issued his ruling on Thursday, 10 September 2009, just two days before the 2.5+ million people protest in Lamberth's front yard. Mack Ellis was in D.C on 10 September and told the Judge was still working on his response. It's not elsewhere publicly posted. Lamberth's decision is not posted on the D.C. Circuit Court publicly accessible website as-for example- Lamberth's 2 July ruling"

http://jaghunters.blogspot.com/

[rxsid]

Ping!

[GOP Poet]

bookmark

[Lurking Libertarian]

That’s not what the judge’s order says (it’s at the link).

[rxsid]

[Lucky9teen]

[STARWISE]

Translation ?? Positive ?

[Dianna]

Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?

[San Jacinto]

Cockamamie jibberish.

[dinodino]

Er, I read the linked document and it says nothing like what the article says.

[rxsid]

Yeah, I’m not sure I agree with his interpretation.

[roaddog727]

OK.

What does this all mean in idiot’s terms

[rxsid]

"Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?"

Official by whom? The 5th Amendment? Or, the 1940's judicial rule?

[Parley Baer]

OK, I need a summation of what this is all about.

[Man50D]

Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?

A Ggrand Jury does not have to be convened through the judicial system to be official. That is a big myth perpetrated by the judicial system since the mid 1940's.

[American Constitutionalist]

I think it means, it will proceed if another court will take it.

[La Lydia]

It doesn't say that. It says it will "reconsider its July 2 order denying the Super American Grand Jury leave to file "presentments"...motion for reconsideration is granted...should the fee be tendered the "presentments" will be dismissed as the petitioners lack standing to enforce the criminal laws of the United States.

I am so sorry, but there is no way to interpret that to say that it grants any "recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse..."

[rxsid]

Good evening roaddog727!

Well, to be sure...I'm not. From what I can tell at this point (a non attorney's point of view), it looks like:

1)The judge GRANTED their leave to file their presentments (i.e. accusations) and therefor "recognizing" them and their right to file the presentments.
and
2)The judge followed up by essentially saying his court is not the proper jurisdiction.

[Lurking Libertarian]

OK. What does this all mean in idiot’s terms

A group of people got together, without any official standing, and called themselves a "grand jury," and voted to charge Obama with all sorts of crimes. They then took their phony "presentment" to a real court, which told them they couldn't file it because they aren't a real grand jury. They then moved for reconsideration and the judge said, "OK, you can file it if you pay the filing fee, but I will then dismiss it as soon as you file it, because you're still not a real grand jury."

In the Bizzaro-world of the Birthers, this passes for a "victory."

[Art in Idaho]

Whoa!