Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES! JUST NOT...
jaghunters ^ | 9/22/2009 | jaghunters

Posted on 09/22/2009 4:24:26 PM PDT by rxsid

"JUDGE ROYCE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES OF FRAUD AND TREASON! JUST NOT IN LAMBERTH'S COURT

JAG HUNTER HERE:

Judge Royce C. Lamberth grants permission for any recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse (present) SOETORO-OBAMA on criminal charges of TREASON and FRAUD!

Judge Lamberth has also vetted the Super Grand Jury presentment for TREASON and FRAUD, found the formal accusations meritorious, and will allow them filed formaly in his criminal court.

Judge Lamberth's singular objection is that the Super Grand Jury approached the federal criminal court in the District of Columbia. Not recognized in Judge Lamberth's District Court, the Judge stated the Super Grand Jury lacked standing in the District of Columbia.

Proofs and evidences Judge Lamberth allowed filed in the Federal Court for the District of Columbia are available for use by any criminal court in the United States.

Judge Lamberth is correct that government prosecutors do enjoy discretion in the prosecution of many criminal cases.

However, the command of a Grand Jury to a prosecutor by way of presentment strips that prosecutor of the authority to refuse to bring the Grand Jury's decided, formal criminal accusation before the Petite Jury in a criminal court.

Judge Lamberth issued his ruling on Thursday, 10 September 2009, just two days before the 2.5+ million people protest in Lamberth's front yard. Mack Ellis was in D.C on 10 September and told the Judge was still working on his response. It's not elsewhere publicly posted. Lamberth's decision is not posted on the D.C. Circuit Court publicly accessible website as-for example- Lamberth's 2 July ruling"

http://jaghunters.blogspot.com/


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; jaghunters; obama; soetoro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2009 4:24:26 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; null and void; LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; MHGinTN; pissant; hoosiermama; Amityschild; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 09/22/2009 4:24:53 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bookmark


3 posted on 09/22/2009 4:26:11 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

That’s not what the judge’s order says (it’s at the link).


4 posted on 09/22/2009 4:26:46 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

5 posted on 09/22/2009 4:27:12 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

6 posted on 09/22/2009 4:27:27 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (America is at that awkward stage..2 late 2 work within the system, but 2 early 2 shoot the bastards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

Translation ?? Positive ?


7 posted on 09/22/2009 4:27:39 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?


8 posted on 09/22/2009 4:27:53 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Cockamamie jibberish.


9 posted on 09/22/2009 4:28:14 PM PDT by San Jacinto (/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Er, I read the linked document and it says nothing like what the article says.


10 posted on 09/22/2009 4:31:17 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Yeah, I’m not sure I agree with his interpretation.


11 posted on 09/22/2009 4:32:13 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

OK.

What does this all mean in idiot’s terms


12 posted on 09/22/2009 4:33:11 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
"Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?"

Official by whom? The 5th Amendment? Or, the 1940's judicial rule?

13 posted on 09/22/2009 4:33:23 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

OK, I need a summation of what this is all about.


14 posted on 09/22/2009 4:33:28 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
Would this be the Grand Jury that isn’t an official grand jury?

A Ggrand Jury does not have to be convened through the judicial system to be official. That is a big myth perpetrated by the judicial system since the mid 1940's.
15 posted on 09/22/2009 4:33:37 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I think it means, it will proceed if another court will take it.


16 posted on 09/22/2009 4:35:57 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
It doesn't say that. It says it will "reconsider its July 2 order denying the Super American Grand Jury leave to file "presentments"...motion for reconsideration is granted...should the fee be tendered the "presentments" will be dismissed as the petitioners lack standing to enforce the criminal laws of the United States.

I am so sorry, but there is no way to interpret that to say that it grants any "recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse..."

17 posted on 09/22/2009 4:37:14 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
Good evening roaddog727!

Well, to be sure...I'm not. From what I can tell at this point (a non attorney's point of view), it looks like:

1)The judge GRANTED their leave to file their presentments (i.e. accusations) and therefor "recognizing" them and their right to file the presentments.
and
2)The judge followed up by essentially saying his court is not the proper jurisdiction.

18 posted on 09/22/2009 4:38:18 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
OK. What does this all mean in idiot’s terms

A group of people got together, without any official standing, and called themselves a "grand jury," and voted to charge Obama with all sorts of crimes. They then took their phony "presentment" to a real court, which told them they couldn't file it because they aren't a real grand jury. They then moved for reconsideration and the judge said, "OK, you can file it if you pay the filing fee, but I will then dismiss it as soon as you file it, because you're still not a real grand jury."

In the Bizzaro-world of the Birthers, this passes for a "victory."

19 posted on 09/22/2009 4:40:31 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Whoa!


20 posted on 09/22/2009 4:40:33 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson