[rxsid]

Ping!

[GOP Poet]

bookmark

[Lurking Libertarian]

That’s not what the judge’s order says (it’s at the link).

[rxsid]

[Lucky9teen]

[San Jacinto]

Cockamamie jibberish.

[dinodino]

Er, I read the linked document and it says nothing like what the article says.

[roaddog727]

OK.

What does this all mean in idiot’s terms

[Parley Baer]

OK, I need a summation of what this is all about.

[La Lydia]

It doesn't say that. It says it will "reconsider its July 2 order denying the Super American Grand Jury leave to file "presentments"...motion for reconsideration is granted...should the fee be tendered the "presentments" will be dismissed as the petitioners lack standing to enforce the criminal laws of the United States.

I am so sorry, but there is no way to interpret that to say that it grants any "recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse..."

[RGSpincich]

The judge says go ahead and waste your money on filing fees because you have no standing. Your “presentments” will be dismissed.

[StarFan]

Good grief are there attachments that I've overlooked? The document I read doesn't come close to what you're describing.

My read: They court has reconsidered the motion, they can file their presentments, pay the fee, and it will ultimately be dismissed due to lack of standing.

[null and void]

“Super Grand Jury lacked standing in the District of Columbia.”

Standing.

NO ONE who questions The Onointed One has standing.

[Dajjal]

obumpa

[mlo]

Here's what it really says.

Pending before the Court is the Super American Grand Jury's motion to reconsider this Court's July 2, 2009 order denying the Super American Grand Jury leave to file its "presentments" against President Barack Obama. Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is hereby GRANTED and they are given leave to file their "presentments," upon tendering the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court, however, should the fee be tendered the presentments will be dismissed as the petitioners lack standing to enforce the criminal laws of the United States.

[Pilsner]

Hey Birthers, after your make believe grand juries fail, and they will, what new, daffy, certain to fail, scheme will you try?

Here is a suggestion: Time. No, not the rag, the passing of same. Try to redefine how long four years is. If we are talking dog years, Obama's four year term is up already!

Will it work? No. But it doesn't have any less chance of working than any of this other BS.

Meanwhile, Obama goes merrily on, selling us out. If you really want to do some good, dedicate 1/10 of the energy you put into this foolishness into working for candidates in 2010, or even now, if you are from a state with 2009 elections.

[Dajjal]

obumpa