JUDGE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES! JUST NOT...

jaghunters ^ | 9/22/2009 | jaghunters

[rxsid]

"JUDGE ROYCE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES OF FRAUD AND TREASON! JUST NOT IN LAMBERTH'S COURT

JAG HUNTER HERE:

Judge Royce C. Lamberth grants permission for any recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse (present) SOETORO-OBAMA on criminal charges of TREASON and FRAUD!

Judge Lamberth has also vetted the Super Grand Jury presentment for TREASON and FRAUD, found the formal accusations meritorious, and will allow them filed formaly in his criminal court.

Judge Lamberth's singular objection is that the Super Grand Jury approached the federal criminal court in the District of Columbia. Not recognized in Judge Lamberth's District Court, the Judge stated the Super Grand Jury lacked standing in the District of Columbia.

Proofs and evidences Judge Lamberth allowed filed in the Federal Court for the District of Columbia are available for use by any criminal court in the United States.

Judge Lamberth is correct that government prosecutors do enjoy discretion in the prosecution of many criminal cases.

However, the command of a Grand Jury to a prosecutor by way of presentment strips that prosecutor of the authority to refuse to bring the Grand Jury's decided, formal criminal accusation before the Petite Jury in a criminal court.

Judge Lamberth issued his ruling on Thursday, 10 September 2009, just two days before the 2.5+ million people protest in Lamberth's front yard. Mack Ellis was in D.C on 10 September and told the Judge was still working on his response. It's not elsewhere publicly posted. Lamberth's decision is not posted on the D.C. Circuit Court publicly accessible website as-for example- Lamberth's 2 July ruling"

http://jaghunters.blogspot.com/

[parsifal]

I never have asked Obama for a copy. I have seen some copies on the internet and they looked real to me.

parsy, who trusts Hillary and Bill, too

[parsifal]

Yes. They do. It has become an obsession. Thank God, they ain’t UFO-ologists or they would be invading Wright-Patterson and Area 51 and digging holes all over Roswell.

parsy, who says it is a psychological problem

[little jeremiah]

Makes “the rest of us look unhinged” to who? Democrats and leftists and RINOS and the media (but I repeat myself) already hate conservatives.

So whose opinion are you worried about?

[little jeremiah]

Obviously this guy is a total nutcase who must be on mind altering drugs, legal and/or illegal.

I vote for lithium plus other stuff.

[MHGinTN]

LOL

[MHGinTN]

Well, some folks want to be defrauded so they will feel comfy ignoring their responsibility to exercise their sovereignty in this Republic ... which of course isn’t going to last much longer if Barry Soetoro remains in power with his commie fascist goon squad dismantling the economic, social, and military structure at the pace he’s set.

[Plummz]

The point of the article is that if an actual federal grand jury, what the statist media whores call a “runaway grand jury;” if a real grand jury referred the complaint to Judge Lamberth, Lamberth said he would hear it.

That interpretation/spin seems to be only a little bit of a stretch. It is indeed curious that the Judge would suddenly partially reverse himself like that in favor of the plaintiff (the pretend grand jury).

If this pretend grand jury group was smart/ballsy, what they’d do next is hand out FIJA literature and their indictments/URLs etc in front of the Perryman court building in downtown DC.

PS. Is the pretend-for-now indictment online anywhere?

[Dajjal]

obumpa

[trumandogz]

A group of people got together, without any official standing, and called themselves a "grand jury," and voted to charge Obama with all sorts of crimes.

So, it would be something like my winning a game of Monopoly and then heading to Atlantic City and claiming that I owned the Boardwalk?

[Beckwith]

“When he showed them the proof” — demonstrated to be counterfeit.

Obama WAS born in the States. — “at birth,” Obama was a citizen of Kenya and a British subject — he admits to this fact.

Doesn't matter where he was born. Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.

Orly is pressing the wrong set of facts, but dismissing the above identifies you as an Obot or an ostrich.

[roaddog727]

I think he may well have a COLB printing press in the sub basement of the whitehouse.

[little jeremiah]

He’s mental in addition. I’d say lithium deprived.

[parsifal]

Not an obot or ostrich. I just haven’t seen anything to suggest that Obama isn’t eligible to be president. Obama gets on my nerves. His speeches are like a Platitudes 101 class. Most of the time I flip channel to anything else, including the Nostradamus crap on History Channel not to have to listen to his banal crap. But, he is the president.

parsy, who says the GOP lost, you did it to yourselves, and if you spend 1/10th the time on why the GOP has lost relevancy that you do on this birther idiocy —you might become a better party

[rxsid]

"PS. Is the pretend-for-now indictment online anywhere?"

Why did you say "indictment?"

They filed a presentment(s). Perhaps that's what you meant. I'm no lawyer, but AFAIK, there is a BIG difference between those two words.

From M-W:

indictment
1 a : the action or the legal process of indicting b : the state of being indicted
2 : a formal written statement framed by a prosecuting authority and found by a jury (as a grand jury) charging a person with an offense
3 : an expression of strong disapproval
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indictment

presentment
" 1 : [generally] the act of presenting to an authority a formal statement of a matter to be dealt with; specifically : the notice taken or statement made by a grand jury of an offense from their own knowledge without a bill of indictment laid before them
2 : the act of offering at the proper time and place a document (as a bill of exchange) that calls for acceptance or payment by another
3 a : the act of presenting to view or consciousness b : something set forth, presented, or exhibited c : the aspect in which something is presented"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/presentment

And no, I've not seen the presentment(s) online anywhere.

[r9etb]

What does this all mean in idiot’s terms

He says they need to pay the fee before he tells them to go pound sand. And if they don't pay the fee, they can just go pound sand for free.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Here’s how this got started ...

Leo Donofrio wrote an article about the power of the Grand Jury and how the government has attempted to control what actions a Grand Jury can take and consider once convened. He presented historical evidence and legal opinions proving that prosecutors can’t tell a Grand Jury what they can or can’t consider. If a lawfully convened Grand Jury wanted to investigate Obama’s eligibility and the possible fraud involved in his being certified by the DNC, they could do so. If they decided to indict, they could file a presentment. The courts must by law take action on Grand Jury presentments. They cannot refuse to hear the matter.

Some people armed themselves with just enough information to be dangerous. They thought that they could convene their own GJ outside of federal criminal procedure and indict Obama.

Obviously, they are wrong. Leo Donofrio explained to them that they had misunderstood his analysis and condemned their actions. Yet, they persist in this stupidity.

[Beckwith]

Not an obot or ostrich. I just haven’t seen anything to suggest that Obama isn’t eligible to be president.

Thank you for clearing it up -- that comment clearly identifies you as an ostrich.

[rxsid]

Question is...why on earth would the judge even go THAT far? Why not simply dismiss it all together? He dismissed them before! Why GRANT them anything?

[r9etb]

Question is...why on earth would the judge even go THAT far? Why not simply dismiss it all together? He dismissed them before! Why GRANT them anything?

I think that, because they filed for reconsideration, he had to respond. He did ... with a swift kick to the crotch.

[rxsid]

Sure, he had to respond...but again, why grant anything? His response could have been to uphold his earlier decision to dismiss them. No?