BARACK HUSSEIN BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT FORGERY ...... THE FRAUD GOES ON

Atlas Shrugs ^ | 3/20/09 | Pam Geller

[pissant]

When I broke the explosive exclusive last June that Obama's COLB (certificate of live birth) was a "horrible forgery," it took a couple of days, but the O-bots sent around this "birth announcement". That too apparently was a forgery.

[Fred Nerks]

Check the dates on the newspaper announcements. And don’t bother to reply.

[Las Vegas Ron]

The n00b playing you is at least sticking faithfully to the Axelrod talking points.

Thanks and you're right, but it was I who was playing him ;^)

[Fred Nerks]

you have mail

sending link to relevant dates...won’t post it here, don’t want to make it easier for the opposition to scrub the web, now do we?

[MHGinTN]

;^) Have fun

[Las Vegas Ron]

I think we scared him away

[Art in Idaho]

Found this little gem on the TD link from above:
on July 23, 2008 at 1:23 am | Reply Philip_B
Get your researchers checking shipping records. There is a good chance Obama’s mother went to the mainland by sea and given that Ann Dunham was know to be in WA when Obama only a couple of weeks old. Either she left immediately after Obama was born, which I think unlikely, or he was born onboard ship prematurely. Which would mean he was born outside US territorial waters and not automatically a US citizen.

Has anyone ever followed up on the born on a ship idea, checked the shipping records? Interesting. . .

[rodguy911]

And you already know what DNA will show without testing any, how does that work?

[little jeremiah]

Probably his ISP would tell a tale of previous membership.

[little jeremiah]

>>>obsession, paranoia<<<

More like “megalomania, history of lying and deceit, hidden criminal behavior, etc”.

You’re funny, actually.

[cynwoody]

And you already know what DNA will show without testing any, how does that work?

I don't know what it would show. I'm just pointing out that it doesn't address the birther question.

I'm fairly certain it would confirm Stanley Ann Dunham was his mother. And probably also BHO, Sr, as his father. But paternity is less certain. If you've been reading these threads, you will know that some folks think he resembles Malcolm X or Frank Marshall Davis more closely than BHO, Sr. Of course, if the DNA were to show either of those guys was his father, then the birther thesis would be totally out the window, since it would no longer matter where he was born.

[esquirette]

Newspapers are on microfilm in libraries. Can’t someone just go look for that page?

[Calpernia]

I can update an online article too Jeremiah. But they can’t update old publications that already went into circulation, years ago.

[rodguy911]

Exactly, something concrete like DNA shuts up a lot of the wrong people and decides scientifically once and for all who is who and who is not.

We are dealing with someone who is probably not qualified to be in the highest office of the land and who most likely got their fraudulently.

His mentors/handlers have erased and scrubbed almost every possible link there is to proving such info. We need hard assed proof on everything we do to get rid of him.

[Calpernia]

>>>The problem is no one else does either. No one has replicated it. And you cannot make a claim such as that and go into hiding. You got to stand up and prove it.

I agree with that; but running and hiding shouldn’t be the only basis of discreditting what he says.

Over the past few months, I’ve been sick at some who have stepped forward, and then stepped back. Sick, disappointed and shocked.

[cynwoody]

We need hard assed proof on everything we do to get rid of him.

To get rid of him, we need a majority of the House and two thirds of the Senate. A House majority is an outside possibility if things go really well in 2010. But even if the GOP runs the table in Senate, there are not enough seats at risk in 2010 to reach two thirds. So, whatever dirt was dug would have stink badly enough to get some Democratic senators sufficiently worried about their reelection in 2012 or 2014 to vote to remove.

[Calpernia]

>>>I had one of the lawyers on the Keyes case make a photostatic copy of two slides of microfilm: one made from the birth announcement that appeared in the Sunday Advertiser AND the other one made from the same birth announcement that appeared in the Star Bulletin. I asked him to look for any signs of the film being spliced

That must be Gary Kreep? I will read no further. All credibility has just flown out the window.

[Polarik]

That must be Gary Kreep?

No, it was a man named Jim.

[Political Junkie Too]

I'm confused. What's the story here?

Did somebody mock up a page to look like an old 1961 page with a birth announcement, or did someone actually find the 1961 paper, or its microfiche copy, and print that out?

Is this story suggesting that there was no announcement in the actual archives, and that everyone assumed it to be so because somebody forged an announcement to look like the real thing, thereby dissuading people from actually traveling to Hawaii to research it for themselves?

-PJ

[Calpernia]

>>>>Factcheck didn’t photograph a jpeg; they photographed the COLB.

Correction, FactCheck photographed many COLBs, all on pretty multiple pieces of paper. Look at all the pretty colors!