Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
Dispite all the high powered lawyering, Obama’s ability to govern will be in the basement along with his worthless credibility. His cover-up makes Nixon’s two-bit break-in cover-up look juvenile. Obama’s treachery shows us he is the grand master of all flim-flamers.
Some stupid bureaucrat probably came up with that analysis. How dumb is it to claim that a footprint or fingerprint has no value. When I discussed the existing footprint with a forensic document analyst, I got just the opposite reaction. It has got be better than no print at all.
Obama will have fun trying to come into court as an illegal alien who is in deportation proceedings which will take place after the criminal courts get through with him.
How is it possible that an ineligible presidential candidate can legitimately select a running mate? The whole ticket was phony from the get go. Are the democrats going to try and argue that this is a big surprise and that no one could have known there was an issue of eligibility before they went ahead with their convention? That position will really set the country off. Just let Pelosi and Reid try to sell that one to the public.
Everybody is afraid to touch this one. And the press (radio & TV) has been warned (upon threat of losing their licenses and worse) to never mention it. They were even given a list of other words to use in case a caller brought it up. Laugh it off, don’t discuss it, etc. Can’t remember the name of the article, but Canada Free Press brought this up and wrote the whole story about a month ago.
FWIW, I totally agree with you. Head of the ticket was bogus from the get go. I want a do over, but at the rate he is dismantling this economy it’s unlikely to happen.
There is a really ugly thread running through the minority community while many suburban whites have not been paying attention. Many of them have been gaming the system and spreading generations of hate while many of us have been fiddling while Rome burns. The Won could commit a heinous crime in broad daylight in front of 1000 eye-witnesses and there is a sizable element that would excuse him and re-elect him. You know who they are.
If Biden was to take over temporarily I think he would walk a fine careful line...
He would want to be invisible and agreeable...
I think he woulkd quickly fire those czars, if oinly because they are an added expense that the American tax payer does not accept..
Plus because they are part of Barry’s administration and caused much of our new debt...
Biden woulod want to put much space between him and the past illegal activity...
Of course he might just have to go at the same time...
After all he must know about Barry’s ineligibility, and if so he has acted against the interests of the United States by not saying so...
Ah that would be called TREASON...
How is it possible that an ineligible presidential candidate can legitimately select a running mate? The whole ticket was phony from the get go.
__________________________________________________
I menttioned something to that effec t up thread...
or maybe another thread...
I was informed that since the Democrats had voted for the ticket at their convention, Biden was legal and would take over as POTUS...
LOL
Ah nope...
:)
Please replace paragraph 8 of Section 2F3.a(b) with the following statement taken from the recently released Guidelines for Perinatal Care written jointly by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists:
Individual hospitals may want to continue with the footprinting and fingerprinting but universal use of this practice is no longer recommended.
OK, I will grant you that something like one in ten baby footprints can be used for ID. We could get lucky, but Obama’s lawyers will put their baby footprint expert on in front of the judge and have him quote the above government regulation based on the guidelines from AAP and ACOG. I don't think a judge will order inking up Obama’s feet, but he/she could. Plaintiff will argue what does Obama have to lose. I do hope to witness such a hearing regardless of how it goes! I am also saying a prayer for the person who left the thumb print on the document.
Never said it was “fashionable”
Read “unfashionable” in my post.
Well, one thing it should certainly accomplish is to shift the burden of going forward and get Obama to come out of the closet and affirmatively prove with clear and onvincing evidence who he says he is. His position has never been correct that the burden is on the American people to prove he is not qualified, since it is not a right but a privelege to be President. Driving a car is a privelege and not a right and anyone who wants to drive has the burden to prove themselves qualified. It is not the state’s obligation to prove the applicant is not qualified. The same holds true for any job applicant who must affirmatively show proof of meeting the qualifications for the job. The whole process with Obama has been upsidedown and phony but for some reason no one with authority has forced him to prove his qualifications for office.
For some reason I can’t can’t get paragraph breaks in my post. I even hit return twice and they don’t show in the post...
Should read above “McCain is NOT qualified”
There’s still a lot of fuzziness around McCain’s NOT being qualified.
True he was born of two parents that were U. S. citizens and it’s true that he was born in a hospital in the Canal Zone, not on U. S. soil. However, the hospital may have been under contract to the U. S. at the time, which seems to be the case and it could be considered in the same manner as with U. S.Embassies being U. S. property (?). This is an issue that the Supreme Court will have to decide.
Another thing to think about is when was the hospital aboard the Naval Base built. It’s my understanding that it wasn’t built till after Johnny boy was hatched, by a couple of years. So anyone spouting off that he was born in the base needs to research their facts a lot more.
bookmark
There is another interesting aspect to McCain’s situation and that is his parents were abroad under orders of the sovereign - doing the sovereign’s bidding.
YOu are absolutely right. I mis-read your post after many hours of reading my computer screen. My deepest apologies.
I think this could be the beginning of the downfall. Of course serving the Consul General doesn't mean someone in Kenya can't purge the records but at least something is happening. Email message follows here:
THIS WILL HOPEFULLY BE THE END OF OBAMA "ISSUE"...Dan Smith,NY
PAUL ANDREW MITCHELL HAS BEEN WITH THIS FROM THE START. Please read AFFADAVIT & DECLARATION by Lucas Daniel Smith Hat Tip to Paul Mitchell .......
Please Forward this out... In a message dated 9/5/2009 8:23:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, supremelawfirm@gmail.com writes:
Is it now time formally to serve a SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE?
, http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/Keny ... bpoena.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/thir ... ucasSmith/ http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/thir ... mith01.png http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/thir ... mith02.png http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/thir ... mith03.jpg
-- Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/p ... eneral.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice Declaration under Penalty of Perjury: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1746.html
"Under the jurisdiction of the United States" I believe would be the qualifying principle here, and yes, SCOTUS would have to clarify it. I think they'd have to look at the repealed 1790 law that stated children born abroad of U.S. citizen parents would be considered as "natural born" -- but didn't that law NOT include specifically mention of people abroad in the service of the United States? I think the intent would be that anyone under the "sovereign reach" of the United States would be considered as "under its jurisdiction" as much as the ones born on U.S. soil.
"Born on U.S. soil," however, is a distinction clear enough for the layman to understand.
Wiki talk page argument on what "natural born citizen" means: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ANatural-born_citizen
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.