What Karl Rove Should Tell La Raza

Human Events ^ | 07/10/06 | The Human Events View

[garbageseeker]

White House adviser Karl Rove is scheduled to speak tomorrow at the annual conference of the federally funded, left-wing, open-borders-advocacy group, the National Council of La Raza.

If he does not want his speech to look like an act of appeasement, he should confront La Raza on its opposition to commonsense policies designed to secure both U.S. borders and U.S. pocketbooks.

La Raza, which means “The Race” in Spanish, has denounced as “horrendous” and “appalling” the House immigration bill passed in December, which was sponsored by Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R.-Wis.) and supported by the overwhelming majority of House Republicans. The bill, which calls for tough worksite enforcement of immigration laws and 700 miles of border fencing, was condemned by La Raza as a “laundry list of mean-spirited and intrusive provisions concocted by the most radical immigrations restrictionists in Congress.”

Will Rove defend the immigration reforms passed by President Bush’s party in the House and tell La Raza that House Republicans are neither “mean-spirited” nor “radical”? He should. House Republicans deserve Rove’s support.

[Howlin]

Why don't you be corrected on some things.

Why don't you find something I've posted that isn't the truth, bud.

[rottndog]

Come on, your pick nits.

[rottndog]

pick=picking

[Luis Gonzalez]

your=you're

Is it a second language to you too?

[claudiustg]

http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Features/BookReview/021606_hayworth.html


It was in 448. :^)

[rottndog]

getting late.

[Texasforever]

Why don't ya'll at least try to get your facts straight before embarrassing yourselves by being "corrected". You post about Reagan when you have absolutely NO knowledge of him, you talk about immigration when you don't even have basic facts to back the up, you post "quotes" of people that no one can find. FR is the big league of political debate but you guys are bring the level WAY down.

[Howlin]

‘You just don’t want to help brown people, do you?’”---

Well, well; after all this, she WAS wrong about what was said.

Because he did not say "You just have a problem with brown people."

Quite a difference.

Thanks for proving what we already thought: EVERYTHING has to be verified if it's quoted on THIS thread.

[Texasforever]

Thanks. Unless Rove has denied it then the quote stands.

[garbageseeker]

I will not answer your question unless you answer mine. Do you support President Clinton in his support of the Bush plan? The Bushbots are getting me tired.Anyways, I have work tomorrow.

[claudiustg]

---A guest worker program IS border control.---

War is peace.

[Howlin]

LOL!

[Texasforever]

I don't support Clinton on anything. Period end of story. Are those words little enough for you to understand?

[Howlin]

It's NOT the same quote.

[garbageseeker]

So why were you ducking and dodging for the last 2 hours?

[Texasforever]

You are right. They tried a bit of creative writing to make their point.

[claudiustg]

---You just don’t want to help brown people, do you?---

Yes, I think I'm a little more offended by the actual quote. What a thing to say and what a mindset it betrays.

[Texasforever]

Because it appears to drive you nuts. I like to drive you nuts.

[rottndog]

The whole first half of the speech is about people coming from all over the world to be AMERICAN. If the rest of the world was to grow up and be AMERICAN (truly), then I wouldn't care so much about borders either.

But that's a pipe dream (at least for the next several hundred years), so the only hope for humanity is for America to remain strong and sovereign, that shining city on a hill(as Reagan put it). Think Reagan would agree with that?

[claudiustg]

You are welcome. :^)