Posted on 03/15/2026 8:57:58 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
The federal government holds shocking evidence of UFOs which proves we are not alone — including satellite imagery of out-of-this world craft that look like nothing “we have built,” an expert with knowledge of the documents told The Post.
The government’s trove of UFO docs is massive and includes stunning photos and videos, according to Christopher Mellon, the former deputy assistant secretary of defense intelligence during the Clinton and Bush administrations.
Publicly disclosing the information would take UFO discourse “to another level,” he added.
While the announcement spurred federal agencies, including the White House and the Pentagon, to scramble, there has been no official word on what will be released and when.
The most compelling piece of data, Mellon claimed, are clear satellite photos of craft in space above the Earth that are obviously not manmade.
“We have satellite imagery of craft that sure don’t look like anything that we have built or constructed,” Mellon said.
Those same convincing images of craft engaging in “actions that are difficult to explain” were referenced by ex-director of national intelligence and current CIA director John Ratcliffe in a 2021 Fox News interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
All species expand outwards and colonize. Or try to.
Don’t bother; his thinking is closed.
Truman had knowledge of it, but he had no information on exactly what they were doing. When he was a Senator he was in charge of a program targeting waste & fraud in defense spending. The program had the highest priority and was gobbling up billions of dollars. People started to notice. But when he started sniffing around, the best they could tell him was that it was the the highest secrecy and “trust us”. He wasn’t the only one, the consensus was sort of along the lines of “well, after the war you’re gonna have to have some answers and they better be good, or you’re going to jail”. In those days there was careful public accounting and politically speaking lawmakers faced consequences for misfeasance or malfeasance.
For all that, Truman wrote some things in his autobiography that tends to point to the fact he had a fairly good idea what they were up to.
The US government thought Germany was working on atomic weapons, though they were not, the Germans thought the US was working on rockets, which they were not.
I’m not saying, of course, that the US military is not using, and using well, large, piloted drones carrying a large munition precisely delivered and then retrieved for usage again.
It’s just that in the mass drone scenario, they are cheap ($20-40k) and expendable. I-ran reportedly has thousands of them
Another US drone usage: stealth surveillance, as they can be largely undetectable.
Earth is an amusement park?
Well.. you either believe or you don’t. I believe.
I mean I look around. I read the news and watch the news. There has to be be intelligent life elsewhere in the universe because there’s very little on the planet.
More likely a penal colony with visitation privileges.
Important observation.
Well, God hasn’t told us anything on the subject, yet.
I don’t ignore thoughtful scientists just because they aren’t God.
Btw; they never announced the TR-3B was there as they did when describing all the other flyovers
How do you know THOSE scientists are any more thoughtful than the alleged Climate Scientists?
That explains the German interest in heavy water?
Yes. American (well … Hungarian and Italian) physicists discovered that Graphite was a far better moderator. But, it had to be exceptionally pure graphite. They were getting it from Union Carbide. “You wouldn’t put Boron in your Graphite, would you?” Eventually they got the right stuff.
They kept this a secret, didn’t publish this information, and German scientists never figured that out, and therefore concentrated on heavy water as a moderator. They never got much farther than that.
For one, because 1961 was a different world.
“Can anyone give a credible explanation of why aliens would want to visit earth?’
Lots of reasons have been used in sci-fi.
To eat us: “To Serve Man”.
“We’d Make Great Pets”.
To watch us for entertainment (Star Trek TOS).
To steal our resources.
To kill us and steal our planet.
We have hot chicks.
To warn us against threatening the rest of the universe.
To put us in zoos (Slaughterhouse Five).
Feed off our violent nature (Predator).
To breed with us.
This is very true.
To probe Cartman?
Physics is always advancing.
In 1900 it was scientific consensus that powered flight was hundreds, if not thousands of years in the future.
In 1903 we flew in what was basically a powered kite.
In 1943 we were flying across the oceans, shooting rockets at foreign countries, and closing in on breaking the sound barrier.
In 1983 we were flying regularly into space, had hundreds of satellites circling the earth and a supersonic commercial aircraft.
In 2023 we were not that much ahead of 1983. What happened?
What happened was physics advanced. We have capabilities that are not public knowledge. Why? Because they are disruptive, they are dangerous, and they are being withheld to be used in the event of an existential crisis.
After splitting the atom, the next advances in physics are clear...quantum mechanics, fusion, zero point energy, and anti-gravity. Any of these technologies falling into the wrong hands could be devastating. At the least they would disrupt the world economy. It was determined long ago that scientific advancement would only happen with the approval of those in charge...and those people are not necessarily our elected leaders.
My uncle, who was career Air Force intelligence, who went on to work for the DOE, and ended his career as head of security for Los Alamos and Sandia Labs said to me once:
“You like science fiction? Imagine what you think we have. Now add 100 years. Now you’re getting close.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.