Posted on 12/17/2025 12:40:28 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Infowars Reached Out To Brown University, And Has Received A Statement That Is Covered In This Report
Summary
The transcript features a speaker discussing online speculation about a mass shooting at Brown University on December 13, 2025, which killed two students (including the head of the College Republicans) and wounded nine others.
The speaker focuses on Mustafa (or Mustapha) Karbouch (or Kharbouch), described as a senior figure in the Islamic Studies Department (though sometimes called a pro-Palestinian student or activist), whose university profile, bio, and photos were removed the day after the shooting.
The speaker highlights comparisons between surveillance footage of the shooter—a 5'8"-5'9" overweight individual with pale white skin, wearing black clothing and a mask—and photos/videos of Karbouch at pro-Palestinian demonstrations, noting similarities in build, gait (including walking with hands behind back), facial features (pudgy face and neck), and skin tone.
The speaker questions suspicious elements: no reward offered initially, limited public description of the suspect (buried on a website rather than announced broadly), slow release of footage, withholding of high-quality internal HD facial recognition camera video, and fearful body language from administrators, mayor, and police chief.
Brown University responded to an inquiry from reporters (including from American Journal/InfoWars) stating the profile was removed to prevent doxxing and harassment of the individual, emphasizing that online accusations and conspiracies are irresponsible and dangerous.
The speaker references Officer Brandon Tatum's video headline identifying the suspect as a pro-Palestinian student whose page was deleted, plays clips of others analyzing side-by-side comparisons, and mentions unconfirmed witness claims that "Allahu Akbar" was shouted before the shooting (suppressed by police).
The speaker repeatedly caveats that Karbouch may be innocent, similarities could be coincidental, and there might be an innocuous explanation, but expresses skepticism about a cover-up, drawing parallels to suppressed stories of Islamic attacks elsewhere and historical false flags.
The discussion includes sarcasm about officials clearing the individual and broader criticisms of media/government handling of such incidents.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Well, he(she?) didn’t kill too many people. Why not just let it slide?
This dovetails with Sundance’s post this morning over at Conservative Treehouse. Brown recently shutdown their CCTV in response the leftist complaints. He noted how a college town like Providence would provide cover for Brown’s malfeasance given Brown’s $8B endowment.
Note this as well, this Moustapha K individual is nowhere to be found, and has not come forward to clear himself either.
It is also beyond comprehension that not a single person from this college as a witness to the events, has come forward with any eyewitness facts. It’s like the entire school, student body included, is involved in a coverup.
How do you know none of the people present are talking to the police?
Ok, please post articles where they have given their eyewitness account? Is college campus like Fight Club, where you can’t talk about what goes on?
Maybe he has immunity like Epstein did for 20 yrs.
Something is obviously wrong.
Stongly suspect that one or more of the ten survivors in that room recognized the shooter. Really do believe Brown and the officials they control are involved in a cover up and wanted this guy to disappear. They do not want his involvement with Brown faculty and administrators to become known. They clearly did not share critical information with investigators in the critical early hours. Yet they saw fit to scrub the internet. Also why han’t this guy been found and questioned.
The police have no duty to tell you the details of an ongoing investigation - or to expose a witness.
Maybe they are looking for an accomplice who helped the murderous beast escape? And don’t want the accomplice to get spooked and leave or commit suicide...armchair speculation is fine if presented as a”what if”. But if one really knows...one should go arrest/ or “take care “ of the creeps now.
I believe the witnesses have been instructed not to talk. Just my opinion.
It explains why they don’t interview the eye witnesses. They still can say if it was a 9mm handgun or a long gun like the TA said he saw.
A homo trans immigrant anti semite, definitely a protected class if it is so.
“Yet they saw fit to scrub the internet.”
Is anything on the internet really scrubbed as all data goes.... someplace.
Obstruction of justice / obstruction of a criminal investigation used to be a pretty serious crime. Are we not doing that anymore for certain classes of people?
How many in the faculty were involved in the assassination at Brown? After all it was just a Christian or Jew.
Candace Owens told them so 🤣
and Sandy Hook was a false flag
Since you're the one who made the claim, you should be the one to provide proof, not the person who questioned it. I hope you're not a lawyer.
How does a college endowment fund balance affect the municipality? I would expect that the school pays no real estate taxes, or sales taxes, or income taxes, so why would the city care?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.