|
Posted on 11/30/2025 9:00:00 PM PST by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Here is another FR thread where Mark Halperin states that he believes that Ella Cook, A Christian and Republican, was the specific target of the shooting.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4357699/posts
Many thankQs!
Many thankQs!
I wonder what the topic will be.
Brown published its camera plan for the world to see
My friend @DWincheste55011 is in the security biz and tells me this is a cardinal sin in that world pic.twitter.com/c0JWzZ3fyv— Phil Holloway ✈️ (@PhilHollowayEsq) December 17, 2025
They may be protecting their student, just not the murdered one.
That’s good news!
Parking this here for tomorrow:
https://www.kunstler.com/p/free-and-fair
Free and Fair?
“The prison sentence made Ms. Peters, 70, a martyr for the election-denial movement, and launched a fruitless campaign by Mr. Trump’s followers to win her release from state prison.” —The NY Times
Texas Sues MyChart Owner for Alleged Monopoly, Restricting Parental Access to Children’s Medical Records
The antitrust lawsuit alleges that Epic Systems runs an “anticompetitive playbook.”
Excerpt:
Texas is suing the electronic medical records conglomerate that owns the MyChart system, Epic Systems, alleging that it both has a monopoly on the industry and makes it difficult for parents to access their children’s medical records.
The antitrust lawsuit was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on December 10 in Tarrant County district court. It accused Epic of “inserting” itself as the “gatekeeper” of patient data, by “locking up” hospitals into its electronic health records (EHR) systems, then dictating when and which individuals can access said data.
As described on the Epic Systems website, the company has “more than 325 million patients” with electronic records. Both major Texas medical networks and hospitals — such as Texas Children’s Hospital and Memorial Hermann — and smaller clinics use Epic’s various services, including MyChart.
It represents more than 90 percent of all U.S. citizens, court documents note.
The suit similarly highlights that Epic houses more than 325 million patients’ medical records within its databases, stating that its “strategy” has been “inordinately successful” and has operated as a monopoly in the EHR industry.
.....The statement added that “Epic does not determine parental access to children’s medical records,” and that instead the “decisions about parental access to children’s medical records are made by doctors and health systems.”
While the suit primarily focuses on Epic’s alleged restriction on all patients’ access to medical records within their databases, Paxton honed in on its impact on parents who want unhindered access to all their children’s EHR’s, stating that this litigation against Epic is a part of his “broader effort to stop electronic health record vendors from unlawfully restricting parental access to minors’ medical records.”
“We will not allow woke corporations to undermine the sacred rights of parents to protect and oversee their kids’ medical well-being,” Paxton said in a press release on Thursday.
“This lawsuit aims to ensure that Texans can readily obtain access to these records and benefit from the lower costs and innovation that come from a truly competitive electronic health records market,” he concluded.
Banks Are Racially Profiling Mortgage Applicants — The Government Requires It
So much for color-blindness.
https://spectator.org/banks-are-racially-profiling-mortgage-applicants-the-government-requires-it/
Excerpt:
Your banker is racially profiling you when you apply for a mortgage loan. If he doesn’t, the lending institution you’re applying to is subject to harsh federal penalties for not engaging in racial profiling. The most amazing part of the applicable federal regulation is that if you refuse to disclose your ethnicity and race, the banker is required to visually appraise you, make a guess as to your race/ethnicity based on your appearance, and then report those racial observations to the government.
Bull Connor smiles.
The left has racialized pretty much everything it touches, and during the Obama administration, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created by the Dodd-Frank legislation. The CFPB was the brainchild of Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. Among the tasks taken on by the CFPB is the gathering of information regarding an applicant’s ethnicity, race, and sex under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act.
The good news is that Donald Trump has been trying to kill off the CFPB. The bad news is that it’s not dead yet, so mortgage lenders across the country are still being drilled on the importance of viewing customers through the prism of race, and learning how to provide reporting based on observed skin color, accent, surname, hairstyle, and other ethnic characteristics of those applying for mortgage loans.
At this link is a typical “Demographic Information Addendum” from a credit union’s mortgage application, which reads in part [emphasis added]:
For residential mortgage lending, Federal law requires that we ask applicants for their demographic information (ethnicity, sex, and race) in order to monitor our compliance with equal credit opportunity, fair housing, and home mortgage disclosure laws. You are not required to provide this information, but are encouraged to do so. You may select one or more designations for “Ethnicity” and one or more designations for “Race.” The law provides that we may not discriminate on the basis of this information, or on whether you choose to provide it. However, if you choose not to provide the information and you have made this application in person, Federal regulations require us to note your ethnicity, sex, and race on the basis of visual observation or surname.
For those of us who have lived our lives embracing the idea that America should be color-blind, it is appalling that the government is mandating that businesses visually assess their customers and report ethnic and racial characteristics “on the basis of visual observation or surname.”
Further, if a consumer is applying for a mortgage by phone, the mortgage banker must interrogate the applicant about his race, sex, and ethnicity.
As it turns out, hundreds of Bank of America mortgage bankers did find those racial profile questions so offensive that they routinely refused to play along. Instead, they simply noted on the mortgage application that the customer applying by phone refused to provide the racial information.
.....To punish Bank of America for not properly interrogating its customers on the racial composition of their bloodlines, the CFPB imposed a $12 million fine on the bank in 2023. The Consent Order imposed on Bank of America, dated November 2023, is at this link. It is a long, disgusting read that sounds like the prosecution of a business in the 1950s South for refusing to comply with segregationist Jim Crow laws. Here is just a snippet [emphasis added]:
Some of [Bank of America’s] loan officers continued to record “information-not-provided” without asking applicants for their race, ethnicity, and sex. Specifically, in 2023, before the Effective Date, [Bank of America] began directing loan officers to identify through an electronic flag any call on which the loan officer collected an applicant’s race, ethnicity, and sex. When [the bank] audited those calls, it found that some loan officers were not, in fact, requesting race, ethnicity, and sex information on the flagged calls. [Bank of America] represents that it disciplined certain loan officers as a result.
.....Aside from enforcing racial profiling, the CFPB has been an incompetent and corrupt organization that cannot even keep consumer information safe. In March of 2023, it was revealed that a CFPB employee had forwarded to himself more than 250,000 confidential consumer records obtained from financial institutions reporting to the CFPB.
The Trump administration has been trying to kill off the CFPB by starving it of funding. Under acting CFPB head Russ Vought, the administration is also idling those employees who cannot be terminated, and wherever possible, it is suspending all active investigations and projects that were initiated before Donald Trump’s inauguration. The final decommissioning of the Consumer Financial Protection Board cannot come soon enough.
Buck Moon over Northumberland, England
We have no Government armed with Power
| capable of contending with human Passions
unbridled by morality and Religion.
John Adams
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
