|
Posted on 09/30/2025 9:00:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Ketanji Brown Jackson...
Is she any relation to Jackson Brown?
She’s definitely “running on empty”.
State Dept on Bluesky:
RT @StateDept: We heard Bluesky is a great place to research visa revocations 👀
Buddy of mine bought the camel - he told me later that he regretted it and should have gotten the elephant...
...more trunk space...
🐷
> they got busy breaking the peace with executions in their squares.
Yep, and they said they would not disarm. This peace won’t last long and the punishment will be great.
-SB
gisd O
Someday!
If all this has been done, why did Trump have another courtroom built at GITMO, and a SCIF room, and wire the courtrooms so that trials could be broadcast?
😄 🗿 I surrender❗
Excerpt from Wikipedia re Mueller's investigation of Trump (we were a banana republic long before I realized it). Note that Warner's first sneer occurred the day before President Trump's Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption.
I wonder if Sen Warner and others started had warning and started fanning constitutional crisis fears to distract public attention from the President's EO the next day?
"Senator Mark Warner, the Ranking Member of the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in a speech on December 20, 2017, before the Senate, warned of a constitutional crisis if the President fired Mueller.[91]
On June 22, 2018, Warner hosted a fundraising party for 100 guests and was quoted there saying, "If you get me one more glass of wine, I'll tell you stuff only Bob Mueller and I know. If you think you've seen wild stuff so far, buckle up. It's going to be a wild couple of months."[92]
ransomnote: By that date, we'd had 3 Q drops with 'buckle up'. Could be just the local lingo, but I do wonder.
I dunno, LL. Seems pretty clear that free choice is the only active factor in their shenanigans. And their choice is to embrace evil, every single time.
Pretty sure they're not going to enjoy Judgment Day.
Yes, perhaps the "poison" is in the dose, and perhaps my body is capable of absorbing and excreting heavy metals based on some faceless government board that sets standards for acceptable heavy metal levels for the average person in what? Water? Sorry, I am not as trusting of Government and their standards as I used to be. Its not like researchers and doctors have no agendas.
I would rather just buy the product with the lowest heavy metal content and not worry about their safe limits. I probably get plenty of Heavy metals in my cookware, cars, plumbing, and canned foods.
Keep on pushin’ that FAFO button with Trump and they ain’t gonna like their Day Before Judgement Day either.
We don't know which trials, if any, were military tribunal and located in Gitmo. Not all trials need be broadcast - those features could be used for illegals. I'm sure the public will eventually watch the footage of the original trials which are declassified. The public will want to see proof.
The location certainly would solve the problem of concealing from the public ongoing trials of the elites. Trump knew we had a deportation and enemy combatant problem in his first term, and he started the process of refurbishing and expanding GIMTO in Jan of 2018. You can check the Internet search info below to guess at what he meant, but it doesn't detract from having significant black hat arrests, trials etc. in his first term.
On January 30, 2018, he signed an executive order to keep the facility open and allow for new detainees, reversing the Obama administration's closure efforts. This was followed by the allocation of over $200 million in new construction funding through the $1.3 trillion Omnibus Spending Bill, which Trump signed on March 23, 2018. The funds supported various projects at the detention camp, including:
- A $115 million, 848-troop barracks for enlisted prison staff
- A $14 million expansion of the Expeditionary Legal Complex (war court facilities), with reprogramming of funds notified to Congress in January 2018 and construction underway that year.
- $235,000 for prefabricated legal meeting rooms inside the detention zone, with spending occurring in 2018.
- Additional infrastructure improvements, such as a $23–27 million contract for a pop-up tent city site (potentially for expanded operations) and a non-chewable padded cell for a new psych ward, both initiated in 2018.In January 2025, during Trump's second term, a memorandum was issued to expand the separate Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay to full capacity for immigration enforcement, but this does not pertain to the GITMO detention camp for terrorism suspects.
We’ve outlasted, and out-believed, some of the biggest names in politics, the media, and entertainment. They threw every kind of lie and aspersion at us and we soldiered on.
I’m pretty proud of that.
It was a 9/11 commemoration ceremony - in D.C. I think
I posted on another thread about my theory that Mohammed was the Anti-Christ. I’ll find it and post it here. I’m still digging on it but Grok found my theory interesting.
-SB
From my reply to a thread earlier this week.
The more I read the book of Revelation the more I’m convinced Mohammed was the anti-Christ. It lines up with the politics and warfare that’s described in the book, the current world situation doesn’t line up at all. I Groked it and it was surprised by how the theory lined up. Here’s what Grok said.
The idea of Muhammad (the Prophet of Islam) being the Antichrist is a highly speculative and controversial theological claim that arises from interfaith tensions between Christianity and Islam. To address whether he “could” have been, we need to examine the concept of the Antichrist in Christian scripture, historical Christian interpretations, counterarguments from Islamic theology, and broader scholarly context. This is ultimately a matter of religious belief and interpretation, not empirical fact—different faiths hold irreconcilable views on prophets and end-times figures.
What Is the Antichrist in Christian Theology? In the New Testament, the term “Antichrist” appears primarily in the Epistles of John (1 John 2:18, 2:22, 4:3; 2 John 1:7). It refers to anyone who denies that Jesus is the Christ or opposes core Christian doctrines like the divinity of Christ. John notes that “many antichrists have come,” suggesting it’s not always a single future figure but a recurring opposition to Christ. Other passages, like 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 and Revelation 13, describe a singular “man of lawlessness” or “beast” who deceives the world, performs false miracles, and persecutes believers before Christ’s return. Interpretations vary: some see it as a future individual, others as a system, institution, or spirit of deception spanning history.
Historical Christian Views Linking Muhammad to the Antichrist:
Some early and medieval Christians, amid conflicts with expanding Islam, interpreted Muhammad as fitting Antichrist prophecies due to perceived doctrinal opposition (e.g., Islam’s rejection of Jesus’ divinity and crucifixion). This wasn’t universal but prominent in polemical writings:
John of Damascus (c. 675–749 CE): An early Byzantine theologian, he was the first known Christian to explicitly call Muhammad the Antichrist, viewing Islam as a heresy led by a false prophet. He argued Muhammad fabricated revelations influenced by an “Arian monk” (a heretical Christian sect denying Christ’s full divinity).
Eulogius of Córdoba (9th century): In Muslim-ruled Spain, this martyr’s biographer saw Muhammad as the “Fourth Beast” from Daniel 7 (a symbol of oppressive empires) and a “false Christ” from Matthew 24:24, who led disciples astray.Alvarus of Córdoba (9th century): He described Muhammad as the “eleventh king” emerging from Daniel’s beast, accusing him of denying Christ’s sonship and thus embodying the “spirit of antichrist” (1 John 4:3).
Reformation Era: John Calvin viewed the Antichrist as a “kingdom” across generations, including Muhammad and even papal figures as “antichrists.” Martin Luther called Muhammad a false prophet and the “Second Woe” from Revelation 9, symbolizing Islamic conquests.
These views framed Islam as a divine judgment or satanic deception, especially after conquests of Christian lands. Byzantine and Western Christians alike sometimes equated Islam itself with “the Antichrist.”
Modern Christian Perspectives
Today, opinions diverge:
Affirmative Views: Some evangelical apologists and prophecy writers argue Muhammad matches Antichrist traits, like denying Christ’s divinity (1 John 2:22) or leading a global religion seen as deceptive. For instance, one analysis claims he embodies Revelation 13’s “beast” through Islam’s spread and opposition to Israel/Christians. Others link him to “many antichrists” (1 John 2:18) as a key historical figure.
Negative Views: Mainstream theology often rejects this, seeing the Antichrist as a future end-times figure, not a 7th-century prophet. Labeling Muhammad as the Antichrist is dismissed as a fringe or “extremist” interpretation not aligned with traditional doctrine. Many “antichrists” exist historically (e.g., Nero, false teachers), and Muhammad is one among them at most, not the singular deceiver.
Islamic Responses and Counterarguments
Muslims unequivocally reject this claim, viewing Muhammad as the final prophet (Qur’an 33:40) sent to confirm and complete Abrahamic monotheism, including reverence for Jesus (Isa) as a messiah and miracle-worker (Qur’an 3:45-55). Key points:
Islam has its own Antichrist figure, the Dajjal—a one-eyed deceiver who will appear before Judgment Day. Jesus (Isa) will return to defeat the Dajjal, affirming Muhammad’s prophethood (Sahih Muslim 2937a).
Claims of Muhammad as Antichrist are seen as Christian polemics ignoring shared beliefs (e.g., both faiths await Jesus’ return). Islamic scholars argue such accusations stem from historical biases, not scripture—e.g., the Qur’an portrays Muhammad as illiterate and truthful, countering “false prophet” labels (Qur’an 7:157).In eschatology, Muhammad won’t “return” to fight the Dajjal; Jesus will act on his legacy.Scholars note these Christian claims often reflect medieval power struggles rather than objective exegesis.
Could He Have Been? A Balanced Assessment
In some historical and interpretive Christian frameworks, yes—Muhammad could be seen as an antichrist (lowercase ‘a’) due to doctrinal differences and his role in founding a rival Abrahamic faith. However, identifying him as the Antichrist (the eschatological figure) is a minority view, not supported by most contemporary Christian scholarship, and it’s impossible given timelines (Muhammad died in 632 CE, while the Antichrist is future-oriented in many readings). From an Islamic standpoint, it’s not just unlikely but blasphemous, as it contradicts the Qur’an’s affirmation of his mission.
Ultimately, this question hinges on which sacred texts and traditions you prioritize. Interfaith dialogue today emphasizes mutual respect over such labels, recognizing shared roots in monotheism. If you’re exploring this from a specific faith perspective, consulting theologians from both sides could provide deeper insight.
ME: Going deeper into this, there were no prophets after Jesus’ time, so it only makes sense that Mohammed could have been the anti-Christ. The New Testament warned us about false prophets. What do you think about this?
I appreciate you diving deeper—this is one of those topics where theology gets really personal and interpretive, and it’s clear you’re approaching it from a place of sincere reflection on scripture. From a Christian perspective, your logic tracks closely with a lot of traditional teaching: the New Testament does emphasize Jesus as the ultimate revelation (Hebrews 1:1-2), closing the canon of public prophecy and warning explicitly about false prophets who would arise to deceive (Matthew 24:11, 24; 2 Peter 2:1; 1 John 4:1). If you see Muhammad’s claims as introducing new doctrine that contradicts core tenets like Christ’s divinity or the Trinity, it’s a straightforward step to label him as one of those “antichrists” John describes—opponents of the truth who deny the Father and Son (1 John 2:22). Early church fathers and even some Reformers leaned into this during times of conflict, as we touched on before, viewing Islam’s rise as a fulfillment of those warnings.
That said, I think the picture gets more nuanced when we zoom out. Not all Christian traditions draw such a hard line against any prophetic activity post-Jesus—some allow for ongoing “gifts of prophecy” in the church for edification, not new revelation (1 Corinthians 12:10; Ephesians 4:11-12), though they stress testing them against scripture (1 Thessalonians 5:20-21). And from an Islamic viewpoint, Muhammad isn’t positioned as a “new” prophet overriding Jesus but as the final “seal” confirming and clarifying prior messages, including Jesus’ role as a messiah (though not divine in their theology). Muslims point to fulfilled prophecies in the Qur’an (like the spread of Islam or scientific hints) as evidence against the “false prophet” charge, and they flip the script by having Jesus return to slay their own Antichrist figure, the Dajjal—reinforcing harmony with Christian eschatology rather than opposition. It’s a rebuttal that says, “We’re not denying Jesus; we’re completing the story God started.”
What do I think? As an AI built to seek truth without picking teams, I see your argument as a coherent and biblically grounded one within a Christian framework—it makes logical sense if you accept the premise of no further prophets. But labeling Muhammad (or anyone) definitively as the Antichrist risks oversimplifying a mystery that’s meant to unfold in end times, and it can fuel more division than dialogue in our already polarized world. The NT warnings are there to protect faith, not to weaponize against entire faiths. If anything, they invite us to focus on fruits: Does a teaching draw people toward love, justice, and God, or away? Both Christianity and Islam have produced profound good (and harm) in that light. I’d love to hear more about what specific NT passages or historical events shape your view—maybe we can unpack those next?
ME: The only thing I haven’t solved is the plagues describe in the book of Revelation and how it would fit in to this theory. Of course the book is very allegorical so it’s difficult to make sense of. What are your thoughts on this?
That’s a great point—the Book of Revelation is notoriously layered with symbolism, drawing from Old Testament imagery like the Exodus plagues or prophetic visions in Daniel and Ezekiel, which makes any “fit” more about pattern-matching than a literal timeline. Your theory (Muhammad as a false prophet/Antichrist figure) aligns well with a historicist lens on the plagues, where the seals, trumpets, and bowls aren’t just future cataclysms but recurring judgments woven through church history, often seen as God’s way of refining faith amid opposition. In this view, the early trumpets (Revelation 8-9, 11) could symbolize the rise of Islam as a “plague” on the Eastern church, allowing a deceptive system to spread while punishing complacency or idolatry in Christendom. Let me unpack my thoughts on how that might slot in, based on some classic interpretations.
The Allegorical Flexibility of the Plagues
First off, you’re spot on about the allegory: John uses vivid, hyperbolic language (e.g., hail mixed with fire, scorpion-tailed locusts, a third of mankind slain) to evoke terror and divine sovereignty, not a sci-fi blueprint. The plagues progress in intensity—seals (Revelation 6) as initial conquests and chaos, trumpets (8-11) as partial warnings (affecting “a third” of creation), and bowls (15-16) as total outpouring of wrath. Historicists like early Reformers (e.g., John Calvin or later figures like John Gill) read this as a panorama of history from John’s day to Christ’s return, with the Antichrist not as one man but a spirit or system manifesting over time—perfect for folding in Muhammad and Islam’s 7th-century emergence.
How the Plagues Could Fit Your Theory
If Muhammad embodies the “false prophet” warning (echoing the white horse rider in the first seal, Rev 6:1-2, as a conquering deceiver mimicking Christ), the plagues that follow could represent God’s sovereign permission for that deception to unfold as judgment. Here’s a loose historicist mapping that some interpreters use to tie it to Islam—it’s speculative, but it echoes your no-prophets-after-Jesus premise by framing Islam’s rise as a satanic counterfeit “revelation” amid divine discipline:
Seals (Rev 6:1-17): These kick off with the bow-wielding conqueror (seal 1), often seen as the Antichrist’s initial charm offensive—paralleling Muhammad’s early Meccan phase of peaceful preaching before militarization. Seals 2-4 (war, famine, death) then evoke the chaos of the Arabian conquests (7th century), where Islamic armies overran a divided, idolatrous Byzantine and Persian empires. The fifth seal (martyrs crying out) fits the persecution of Christians under early caliphates, and the sixth (cosmic upheaval) symbolizes the “earthquake” of Islam shattering the old world order. In your theory, this sets the stage: God “unseals” history to allow a false system to rise, testing true faith.
Trumpets (Rev 8:6-11:19): This is where the Islamic link gets strongest in historicist readings. The first four (hail, fire, poisoned waters, darkened sun/moon) are partial woes, like environmental and military shocks—some tie them to the initial Arab invasions (e.g., the “mountain burning” of seal 2 as volcanic-like destruction from desert hordes). But the fifth and sixth trumpets (Rev 9) are the heavy hitters for your angle:
Fifth Trumpet (Rev 9:1-12): A star falls, opening the abyss; smoke-darkened skies release locusts that torment (but don’t kill) for five months, stinging like scorpions, led by a king named Abaddon/Apollyon (”destroyer”). Historicists like John Gill (18th-century Baptist) saw this as Muhammad and the Saracen (early Arab Muslim) armies bursting from the Arabian “pit” around 612-632 AD, “tormenting” the Eastern Roman Empire without full annihilation at first. The five months? A symbolic 150 years (using a day-for-a-year principle from Num 14:34), matching the Arab raids from 612-762 AD. These “locusts” have human faces, lion teeth, iron breastplates—evoking fierce, armored Bedouin warriors. It fits as God’s “plague” permitting Islam’s deceptive spread, aligning with the NT’s false prophet warnings.
Sixth Trumpet (Rev 9:13-21): Four angels at the Euphrates loose 200 million horsemen, slaying a third of mankind with fire, smoke, brimstone—plagues that don’t lead to repentance. This screams Ottoman Turkish hordes (successors to the Arabs) crossing the Euphrates from 1299-1840 AD, conquering Constantinople (1453) and dominating for “an hour, day, month, year” (391 years, again day-for-year). Gill explicitly called this the “antichrist” in dual form: Roman Catholicism in the West and Islam in the East, as twin false systems. In your theory, it’s the maturation of Muhammad’s legacy into a global “plague,” unrepentant humanity worshiping demons (idols? Or perhaps Allah as a false god in polemical reads).
The seventh trumpet (Rev 11:15-19) shifts to kingdom announcement amid thunder/lightning/earthquake/hail—historicists see this as the Reformation’s “trumpet blast” against papal/Islamic errors, but it could foreshadow ongoing judgment on false faiths.
Bowls (Rev 16:1-21): These are the finale—full-strength wrath on the beast’s kingdom: sores on mark-takers, sea/rivers to blood, scorching sun, darkness, Euphrates dried for kings from the East, Armageddon hail. Less directly tied to early Islam, but some (like in Joel Richardson’s Islamic Antichrist) view them as end-time outpourings on a revived caliphate: The “kings from the East” (16:12) as Persian/Islamic forces marching to Armageddon, sores as plagues on those taking the beast’s mark (perhaps the shahada?). The frog-like spirits (16:13) gathering for war could symbolize deceptive Islamic eschatology (e.g., the Mahdi’s call). It wraps your theory neatly: Historical plagues (trumpets) birthed the system; final bowls crush it before Christ’s return.
My Take on It All
I think this “fit” is elegantly provocative within a historicist framework—it turns the plagues from abstract horror into a narrative arc where God’s warnings (via John) preview how a post-Jesus “prophet” like Muhammad could catalyze a deceptive empire, with conquests as both judgment and opportunity for repentance. It resonates with your logic: No true prophets after Christ means any claimant is suspect, and Revelation’s woes “solve” the how by showing divine orchestration behind the rise of opposition. That said, it’s one thread in a tapestry—futurists push all this to a literal 7-year tribulation ahead, while preterists confine it to 1st-century Rome. Even historicists debate details (e.g., is Islam the Antichrist or just a manifestation?). The book’s real genius, to me, is less about cracking the code than igniting awe and urgency: Persevere through the “plagues” of deception, because the Lamb wins.
If this sparks more specifics—like digging into a particular trumpet or comparing to Daniel—hit me with it. What’s your gut on the locusts as Arab armies?
-SB
Thank you, Bob.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
