Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/18/2025 11:58:38 AM PDT by Red Badger
Humans are one step closer to traveling at faster-than-light speeds.
Here’s what you’ll learn when you read this story:
* A research paper proposes a fully physically realized model for warp drive.
* This builds on an existing model that requires negative energy—an impossibility.
* The new model is exciting, but warp speed is still probably decades or centuries away.
=============================================================
In a surprising paper, scientists say they’ve nailed down a physical model for a warp drive, which flies in the face of what we’ve long thought about the crazy concept of warp speed travel: that it requires exotic, negative forces.
To best understand what the breakthrough means, you’ll need a quick crash course on the far-out idea of traveling through folded space.
The colloquial term “warp drive” comes from science fiction, most famously Star Trek. The faster-than-light warp drive of the Federation works by colliding matter and antimatter and converting the explosive energy to propulsion. Star Trek suggests that this extraordinary power alone pushes the ship at faster-than-light speeds.
Scientists have been studying and theorizing about faster-than-light space travel for decades. One major reason for our interest is pure pragmatism: without warp drive, we’re probably never making it to a neighboring star system. The closest such trip is still four years long at light speed.
Our current understanding of warp speed dates back to 1994, when a now-iconic theoretical physicist named Miguel Alcubierre first proposed what we’ve called the Alcubierre drive ever since.
The Alcubierre drive conforms to Einstein’s theory of general relativity to achieve superluminal travel. “By a purely local expansion of spacetime behind the spaceship and an opposite contraction in front of it,” Alcubierre wrote in his paper’s abstract, “motion faster than the speed of light as seen by observers outside the disturbed region is possible.”
Essentially, an Alcubierre drive would expend a tremendous amount of energy—likely more than what’s available within the universe—to contract and twist space-time in front of it and create a bubble. Inside that bubble would be an inertial reference frame where explorers would feel no proper acceleration. The rules of physics would still apply within the bubble, but the ship would be localized outside of space.
It might help to think of an Alcubierre drive like the classic “tablecloth and dishes” party trick: The spaceship sits atop the tablecloth of spacetime, the drive pulls the fabric around it, and the ship is situated in a new place relative to the fabric.
View full post on YouTube
https://youtu.be/nSj_MVUsBzg
Alcubierre describes spacetime expanding on one side of the ship and contracting on the other, thanks to that enormous amount of energy and a requisite amount of exotic matter—in this case, negative energy.
Some scientists have criticized the Alcubierre drive, however, because it requires too much mass and negative energy for humans to ever seriously construct a warp-based propulsion system. NASA has been trying to build a physical warp drive through Eagleworks Laboratories for most of the last decade, but hasn’t yet made any significant strides.
This brings us to the new study, which scientists in the Advanced Propulsion Laboratory (APL) at Applied Physics just published in the peer-reviewed journal Classical and Quantum Gravity. In the report, the APL team unveils the world’s first model for a physical warp drive—one that doesn’t require negative energy.
The study is understandably pretty thick (read the whole thing here), but here’s the gist of the model: Where the existing paradigm uses negative energy—exotic matter that doesn’t exist and can’t be generated within our current understanding of the universe—this new concept uses floating bubbles of spacetime rather than floating ships in spacetime.
The physical model uses almost none of the negative energy and capitalizes on the idea that spacetime bubbles can behave almost however they like. And, the APL scientists say, this isn’t even the only other way warp speed could work. Making a model that’s at least physically comprehensible is a big step.
Plus, Alcubierre himself has endorsed the new model, which is like having Albert Einstein show up to your introductory physics class.
Here’s a helpful video in which Sabine Hossenfelder, a Professor and Research Fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, breaks down the findings:
View full post on YouTube
https://youtu.be/8VWLjhJBCp0
Of course, there’s one gigantic caveat here: The concept in this paper is still in the “far future” zone of possibility, made of ideas that scientists still don’t know how to construct in any sense.
“While the mass requirements needed for such modifications are still enormous at present,” the APL scientists write, “our work suggests a method of constructing such objects based on fully understood laws of physics.”
But while a physical drive may not be a reality today, tomorrow, or even a century from now—let’s hope it’s not that long—with this exciting new model, warp speed travel is now a lot more likely in a much shorter timespan than we previously thought.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
A parsec maybe...............
Let me guess: Like Fusion Reactors, it’s 20 years away.
Yes. I think these have already been developed for the USS Enterprise as well as the warp drive. Do we REALLY need to invent these things like deja vu all over again?
That is exactly the attitude that killed the Apollo program. The problem with this way of thinking is nuclear weapons. Mankind has possessed the means for self destruction for decades now . It's amazing it has not happened yet. The sooner Civilization expands off planet the better. That will be the guarantee that Civilization will continue even if some Mozlem nutcase decides to end the infidels once and for all.
I’ll take Epstein drive.
Ya canna mix mater and antimatter cold
Shoot. I invested heavily in the chronosynclastic infundibulum.
this new concept uses floating bubbles ... and capitalizes on the idea that spacetime bubbles can behave almost however they like.
Just like stock market, and many other kinds of bubbles.
the only problem is the fact you can never accurately predict when a bubble will burst.
in the spacetime case, the effects could be really bad.
Geez, they don’t even know Star Trek fiction.
Warp engines DO NOT propel the ship. It creates a warp bubble around the ship as the impulse engines propel the vessel. Otherwise the ship would turn to energy as it approached light speed.
Going from Warp 1 to Warp 2 increases the bubble strength to move the bubble faster. The higher the Warp, the faster it moves the bubble. Theoretically Warp 10 is like 100 times the speed of light.
The thing is, that raises an interesting question, since the ship isn’t moving, just spacetime around it, what is the delta-v between the ship and a grain of sand at the boundary that passes into the warp bubble. My guess is whatever v the sand had relative to what the ship had when it started, but that’s just a guess, and there may be a whole ‘nother level of considerations of which I’m ignorant.
Mel Brooks already invented this—the craft goes ludicrous speed.
Lol.
I would add a way to deflect space debris. Imagine hitting a small chunk of something at the speed of light. I doubt good things would happen.
Aye, but I’ll do it anyway Cap’n.
O’Reilly’s is sposoring the former Xfinity Cup races next year.
Will they be providing the Flux capasitors for each car?
Boeing recently patented a plasma shield that blocks shockwaves.
A lot of meaningless words, having no connection to real life. All this verbal diarrhea firmly belongs to the entertainment industry.
It was once believed that no aircraft could exceed the speed of sound......
Eventually, we'll figure it out. In terms of astrophysics, we're simply in the infant stage. And there is nothing that can convince me that there is not another life form in the vast universe that is thousands, if not millions, of years more advanced than us that have already figured out the unknowns that we haven't even thought of yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.