Posted on 11/20/2024 2:08:26 PM PST by EBH
People infected with the COVID-19 virus in 2020 may have double the risk for future heart attacks, strokes or premature death from any cause up to three years later – even if they never showed signs of severe illness, according to new research. The risk may be considerably higher in people hospitalized for COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic.
The findings suggest that being hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2020 was a "coronary artery disease risk equivalent," conferring a higher risk for future heart attacks, strokes or death in people without a history of cardiovascular disease than the risk for people with a history who didn't have COVID. The continued increased risk was especially pronounced in people with non-O blood types, representing what the study's authors say is one of the first examples of an interaction between genes and a pathogen that increases heart attack and stroke risk in people.
The analysis, which did not include people infected after vaccines were widely available, was published Wednesday in the American Heart Association journal Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology.
"From the get-go, we knew there was an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but we thought it might be just during the acute phase of infection," said the study's co-senior author, Dr. Hooman Allayee, a professor of population and public health sciences at the University of Southern California's Keck School of Medicine in Los Angeles. "Our study shows three years out, people who got COVID during that first wave of infections are at continued increased risk for heart attacks, strokes and dying.
"COVID, despite the vaccines, is still a public health issue," he said. "Not only does COVID infect the lungs and cause long COVID, this thing just loves the vascular system."
Allayee said the new research found that "even for people who just tested positive but did not necessarily develop severe symptoms, the risk for cardiovascular events was twice as high. It appears to do damage that is long-lasting in some individuals, and that's what we are seeing."
Previous studies have shown that the cardiovascular system could be affected in up to 25% of people admitted to the hospital for COVID-19, causing heart attacks, irregular heart rhythms, heart failure, cardiac arrest or strokes.
Research also has found that blood type may play a role in both COVID-19 susceptibility and the risk of developing cardiovascular problems. Prior studies have found that people with type O blood had a lower risk of becoming infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 than those with other blood types, and that people with type A or B have a higher risk for heart disease, heart attacks, blood clots and strokes compared to their type O peers.
In the new study, researchers analyzed data from the UK Biobank – one of the world's largest and most comprehensive health data sources – for 10,005 people who tested positive for the coronavirus or were hospitalized in the U.K. for COVID-19 between Feb. 1 and Dec. 31, 2020. Researchers wanted to know whether the disease – at any stage of severity – was linked to an increased long-term risk for major cardiovascular events and whether blood type played a role.
They tracked the development of heart attacks, strokes and death from any cause for more than 1,000 days, or roughly three years, following infection.
Regardless of disease severity, participants infected with the virus had double the risk for major cardiovascular events over the course of the study as people not infected with the virus. Those hospitalized for COVID-19 faced a nearly fourfold increase in continued risk for major cardiovascular events compared to people who tested negative for COVID-19.
The increased risk for heart attacks and strokes appeared to result from an interaction with the ABO locus – the gene responsible for determining blood type – and was more pronounced in people with A, B and AB blood types compared to people with type O blood, who did not exhibit increased risk for heart attacks or strokes. About 60% of the global population has a non-O blood type.
The study also showed that people hospitalized with COVID-19 with no history of cardiovascular disease were seven times more likely than their healthy, COVID-negative peers to experience major cardiovascular events within three years. If the hospitalized patients had cardiovascular disease, they were 12 times more likely to experience a subsequent heart attack, stroke or death.
While Allayee and his colleagues did not study how COVID-19 increased the risk for cardiovascular events, prior research sheds some light on potential mechanisms, he said.
A 2023 study in Nature Cardiovascular Research found evidence of the virus in the artery walls of people who died of COVID-19. The virus also had triggered an inflammatory response, releasing molecules known to contribute to heart attacks and strokes. The findings suggest the virus increases the risk for heart attacks and strokes by infecting the artery walls and settling into existing plaques, Allayee said.
"The virus infects the heart itself, but it also infiltrates the cells in the artery walls and the cells inside plaque that has built up there," he said. "If we are seeing an increased risk of heart disease and stroke three years later, that infiltration may somehow destabilize the plaque and do damage to the artery wall that makes plaque more likely to rupture."
Because the new findings stem from an observational and not a randomized study, researchers can't say for certain that COVID-19 infections are causing the higher risk, said Dr. Sandeep Das, a professor of medicine in the department of internal medicine's division of cardiology at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.
"What we can say is that there's an association," said Das, who was not involved in the new study. "But we can't exactly randomize people to have COVID-19 to know for sure."
However, the link between blood type, COVID infection and future cardiovascular event risk lends credence to the theory that COVID-19 may be increasing the chances of having a heart attack or stroke, he said. "That, at least circumstantially, argues there's some biology involved in creating a higher vulnerability. Observational data don't prove causality, but they certainly don't disprove it either."
The study makes an important contribution to researchers' understanding of what happens to people with COVID-19 over time, Das said.
"When COVID first appeared, we were really worried about its acute cardiac effects," he said. "As our management of this infection has gotten better, we're becoming more concerned about the long-term cardiovascular complications. But there isn't a ton of data."
The new findings raise questions about whether and how to treat people with COVID-19 to prevent future cardiovascular events, Allayee said.
"If this is replicated in future studies, cardiologists need to start thinking about what to do for these people," he said. "Diabetes is also a coronary artery disease risk equivalent. If we treat people who have diabetes with medication to prevent heart disease, should we do the same for people who were hospitalized for COVID-19?"
Findings from a subanalysis in the study point to one potential preventive measure that might be considered, Allayee said. Among people hospitalized for COVID-19 with no history of cardiovascular disease, those who took antiplatelet medications, such as aspirin, faced a slightly lower risk for heart attacks and strokes than those who didn't.
"Do we need to start treating these people with aspirin?" he asked.
Daily use of aspirin, even at a low dose, might not be appropriate for everyone, especially if there's no history of heart attack or stroke, according to 2019 guidelines from the AHA and American College of Cardiology for preventing cardiovascular disease. People should consult with their primary care physician before taking low-dose aspirin.
However, there are many preventive measures people can and should take to prevent heart attacks and strokes, whether they've had COVID-19 or not, Das said.
And for those who have, "you can't go back and not have COVID," he said. "Just realize you might be at higher risk than you would otherwise think based on your risk factors. Check the things you can modify. Quit smoking, exercise, eat a healthy diet. Make sure your blood sugar is controlled, and blood pressure is controlled. All those things can reduce your risks."
Heads really do need to roll on all participants. This was a crime against all of humanity.
I know so many now that are gravely ill or who have died from these jabs and.....that were murdered in the hospitals because they had covid. Hospitals were paid to kill people.
So sick.
Without discounting the possibility COVID-19 lab virus has long term effect on the heart - certainly possible, I don’t understand this study as far as it is described in the article.
-No control group/ entirely anecdotal observation
-No differentiation between vaxxed / non-vaxxed
-No differentiation between 1x vaxxed and 3-4x’s
The conclusion is thus entirely unreliable.
One doc thought it was provoked by the last COVID infection about three months prior. Another doc thought the clots and COVID were unrelated. There’s really no way to tell.
A blood clot is considered to be provoked when there’s a clear trigger for the clot, while an unprovoked clot happens without an obvious cause.
I know for a fact this is true, from the hospice nurse who took care of my FIL in his final days in 2022.
She was seeing turbo cancer and turbo dementia (earlier onset and very fast progression), at rates she’d never seen before.
She got the shot for her job, and said she felt like a ticking time bomb. She did have heart issues in 2023.
Should it really be called a study?
On this kind of study, you can't really conduct a randomized study. It would be highly unethical to randomize a group of people and infect some with Covid in order to compare outcomes.
Furthermore, an observational study such as this is not necessarily a weak study. You already have a control group--everyone who did not catch Covid--to compare them to.
As for the physical issues, it makes sense that the risk of cardiovascular events is higher for those who catch Covid. The heart contains plenty of ACE2 receptors, meaning that infection can affect the heart directly. When a virus infects a cell, that cell ends up dead. That means that an infection in the heart kills a lot of heart cells, and the heart does not replace its cells quickly. In addition, the inflammatory processes that occur during the body's efforts to fight the virus also cause tissue damage. So, between direct damage from the virus and the inflammation, considerable heart damage can result.
dforest wrote: “The jabs are the bioweapon. Covid was created in order to get those jabs into as many people as possible.”
That makes no sense whatsoever.
Does anyone with a functioning brain cell really trust anyone in the pharmaceutical industry, physicians, researchers and those associated with the $$$$$ made from killing people and injuring others? They are still refusing to admit any guilt in their perfidy.
I won’t even deal with you idiot vax Nazis. Too many have been damaged and I have zero respect for you.
Buzz off.
My entire family got covid two months before the shots were available. No hospitalizations though, it was like any other cold except for the loss of smell.
We are also all type O, and no other risk profiles so I’m not to fussed about it.
Why would someone admit guilt in devoting their professional life to ensuring the safety and efficacy of the drugs that are approved for mass distribution to the general public?
I always think it's funny when people repeat the narrative that, somehow, FDA approved drugs aren't tested and are "experimental" and then they spend hundreds of dollars buying supplements that actually are not tested and have no safety or efficacy data whatsoever to support their use.
I have the same history as you wrt both the shots and Covid. I agree - what's being said now is simply outside my "circle of concern."
**********
Just my opinion as life goes on.
I always think it’s funny when people like you, who love, admire and speak very highly of the Voodoo Dr. Fauci, come here and keep yapping the exact same bs.
Even your hero Fauci admitted that he talked out of his arse about the useless face diapers and the idiotic 6 feet distance bs.
The little Napoleon Fauci chit enjoyed his power trip , ordering the little people to follow his useless rules, or else.
People like you, are completely void of any normal human feelings or compassion.
It’s absolutely heartbreaking to read so many FReepers horror stories that you will never understand.
Please take your Fauci idol and Voodoo shot and put it where the sun don’t shine.
Everyone needs to be aware of stroke signs and know to request stroke reversible medications in an ambulance ASAP. There is time sensitivity to the medication. know the signs inquire about the medication.Get an ambulance.
The exact same jabs were not given to all. They were experimental and were in batches.
Some people lucked out and some were doomed.
Just quit lying, would you?
they targeted law enforcement and military personnel...
And historically, some people have had bad reactions to vaccines since they’ve been used.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.