|
Posted on 07/14/2024 7:51:21 PM PDT by ransomnote
Melania Trump's Message To Americans
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
I’m not seeing this reported anywhere. Bogus?
I’d say government members/entities etc involved in attempting to assassinate a presidential candidate falls right under levying war (against the constitution), adhering to Globalists and other enemies of the US and it’s founding document, and gives aid and comfort to same.
Just because the “deep state” managed to “get inside the wire” doesn’t absolve them from suffering their much deserved legal consequences.
gisd O
It’s satirical
With respect to an illness, that’s “turbo” by any definition. She probably got a lot of boosters!
I was relieved that they didn’t noodle out picking him, If you had, as a democrat, 2 brain cells to rub together he’d be one of the few candidates who could actually give Trump a run even post hit attempt.
Here’s to hoping the ‘Rats don’t get a clue and pick him for veep. Then again, he’s such a political noob that maybe the decay hasn’t infected him significantly.
That made perfect sense. Of course “security” hired/assigned keeps you alive, but a huge component of it is having a team behind you that is good, and you don’t have to waste time dwelling on security, or altering your public appearances because you feel it’s insufficient or you’re scared.
re: delegate transfer
One article said they were counted informally, how it didn’t say.
Democratic Party factional war (33 minute YOUTUBE video)
~~~~~~~~~~~
Christoforou:
Support for Kamala includes:
Most democrats, although unethusiastically
Soros
Clintons - after reports they were initially supporting Biden over Kamala, now support Kamala
Pelosi? Hasn't endorsed
Obama? Hasn't endorsed
~~~~~~~~~~~
Mercouris - believes Obama and Pelosi understand Kamala has major problems running against Trump
Biden wasn't forced to step down because he was incapable, infirm, and the bad debate with Trump
Biden's polling numbers showed he would be defeated running against Trump. Everything now taking place is about stopping Trump from winning the presidency, and/or preventing a republican route of the 2024 election.
People who want Biden to step down aren't doing so because he's 'not all there' because Biden has never been 'all there' throughout his presidencey. It's because Biden would lose in November.
Having gotten rid of one loser, the Dems get another person they believe is another loser (Kamala).
Mercouris believes that Kamala is the only obvious, natural, realistic option. But with Kamala, the Dems will still lose in November, just as badly as if they would have if they kept Biden.Mercouris believes Obama and Pelosi want to hold back their endorsement because they hope that there will be an open convention and someone 'rather more convincing' will come forward (Gretchen in Michigan, Newsom in California, Pritzler in Illinois etc.)
The problem is that none of those people is going to come forward. None of them want to lose an election against Donald Trump. Therefore, all the alternatives are coming out and endorsing Kamala Harris, because better Kamala Harris than them. That is their calculation.
So Obama, and Pelosi and others who were the arch plotters behind the coup that brought Biden down know that Kamala Harris is not the ideal replacement for Biden. They are going to be left with her (Kamala) because there is no one else.
The very fact that Obama plotted to have Biden removed automatically meant that the the rival faction would want Biden to stay. Now that Biden is gone, that same faction, the Clintons, has united behind Kamala Harris because that's there way of keeping Obama's influence over the democratic party at bay. So we have a factional war, between the Clinton faction and the Obama faction, and we also have a fundamental problem with the election in November.
But Mercouris says, one way or another, we're going to get Kamala Harris as the Democrat candidate. Obama, Pelosi, and apparently Biden himself all believe that Kamala will lose in November, and lose badly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Christoforou: Obama played his cards well here. Even though he was the person orchestrating the removal of Biden, Obama has not come out and endorsed Kamala. Even though Obama was the man behind the curtain, it was a smart move for him to stand back and let everyone put their cards on the table, to get everyone to endorse Kamala, even the Clintons to endorse Kamala. He says he believes Kamala is much closer to the Obama circle than she is to the Clinton's Democrat family or clan.
Obama doesn't endorse anybody and instead calls for party unity. The New York Times said Obama is playing the part of the elder statesman and 'doesn't want to put his thumb on the scale of democracy', but that it doesn't mean Obama doesn't support Kamala Harris. The NYT insists that on the contrary, Obama doesn't want to get in the way of the democratic process, he wants to rise above it. Christoforou says, "To me, this is classic Obama, isn't it? Classic, textbook Obama, how he operates."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mercouris -"he's being the manipulative, guileful, intriguer that he always is. He always is there behind the curtain. I once called him President Macavity - the poem by TS Eliot, the evil cat - the criminal mastermind, he commits these crimes but the point about Macavity is he's never there. That's exactly what Obama is (ransomnote: I looked up Macavity in Wiki here). That's exactly how he functions.
ransomnote: I'm stopping my notes at the 11 minute mark. I really enjoyed listening to this video and am wondering if being outsiders to the US means their interpretations are more accurate or less accurate (or a mixture)- time will tell.
+++!!
Test
heads up to suspicious white van post form 7/14/24 up thread
wasn’t the later linked to the antifa guy?
dusting off cletus’s post from the 14th questioning yearick & crooks??
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
7/16/2024, 6:51:17 PM · 927 of 3,156
Cletus.D.Yokel to Axenolith
I’m still needing more forensics on Dedman and info on Yearick.
It does appear that Dedman is Crooks but the presence of the 2 “peaks” on the ear isn’t definitive; it is not a small anomaly as one of my frens (in youth) had these peaks.
There is a probability that Yearick has the peaks but a very low one.
But the, when the Feebs look for a patsy double, details are important (but how do they get past the ear-guage, you would ask...)
As said, I’m running down info about Yearick.
Which is sorely lacking...like Crooks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
