Posted on 11/14/2022 1:49:32 PM PST by NoLibZone
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on Dec. 11, 2020. A week later, the FDA issued an EUA for Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine. Now, nearly two years later, Pfizer and Moderna will launch clinical trials to track adverse health issues stemming from the COVID-19 vaccines, such as myocarditis – inflammation of the heart muscle.
Pfizer is in the infancy of beginning clinical trials to determine if there are any health risks associated with their own vaccine. In a partnership with the Pediatric Heart Network, the trial will focus on vaccine recipients who have suffered heart issues following being jabbed with the COVID-19 vaccine. The clinical trials will monitor patients for five years.
Enrollment for the study in the U.S. and Canada has not started yet. However, the research team has already identified more than 250 patients with myocarditis, according to Dr. Dongngan Truong – a pediatrician at the University of Utah Health and a co-lead on the Pfizer study.
I feel a giant whitewash coming. . . .
Super trustworthy outfit - this Pfizor. Right up there w/ Merck. Maybe they (or TexasGurl) can investigate and explain the latest/pending election results as well.
“I think we already know the answer.”
No and never vaxxxx same as me? I think. Anyone who declares they are Beethoven fan must be right. Even if living in Iceland.
The public would be amazed if it knew how many “research studies” are financed by the companies that make the drugs in question. What is even more astonishing the results are published by extremely well paid editors of “prestigious medical journals” who’s page are full of expensive full page advertisements from those companies. Would be very skeptical of any studies conducted or financed by Pfizer or Moderna.
The joke is that the last person to be paid is the statistician who must submit his analysis and conclusions prior to receiving his check.
Let me guess, they won’t be able to release the clinical trial results for 99 years.
Too late murderers!
Why bother now, the damage has been done, did what it was suppose to do... Geesh.
Election is over, it’s now safe to investigate this.
The doctors in practice are in the dark still. One told me the other day, “We have not seen excess deaths.” We could not discuss what alternative findings are out there, because state law now says he’d lose his job for doing anything but praising the jab.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is he in California, or has this madness of state law restricting medical opinion spread to other states?
Pfizer and Moderna begin clinical trials to determine if the people killed by their vaccines were actually killed by their vaccines
Day late, dollar short. The same as the GOP method of addressing election fraud. Wait until the damage has irrevocably been done, then talk about addressing the problem.
How many corpses does it take to trigger a trial?
“it’s perfectly safe and effective”
Cart meet horse.
“we’ll now study it”
Clinical trials.....WE were their “clinical trial”
Clinical trials on whom? Rats? Mice? Beagles?
Good time to do it after people have been injured and died.
three years too late.
Since the drug companies have prosecutorial immunity. Why bother to do the study? For the looks? Predetermined outcome for sure
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.