Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[Allegra]

Very interesting Zero Hedge article. Thanks for posting.

I tend to be skeptical of things like that, credible as it seems, so I did some searching and yes, there are some other eye-opening pieces from different sources about the Rockefeller Foundation and their fervor for pushing the shot.

I’ve often wondered why some of the shot enthusiasts got so nasty to those who opposed them. This certainly sheds some light on why that could be.

This could apply to some of the obsessively pro-Zelensky crowd on here as well.

[CatHerd]

>>>>Re your “You mean like entropy12 saying verbatim (post 359) “It is best to ignore Allegra” and posts to Allegra “Look in the mirror, you’ll see the real fake.” while within a post or two of that, Fury writes to entropy to “Knock it off”.”<<<<<

Pot. Kettle. Considering all your posts to others liberally peppered with insults and name calling, this is rich. You regularly call me a “troll” and tell me to “get rekt” in nearly post. Like this one you just made:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=370#370

And here we learn you judge others by whether they are “ideologically neutral towards Q” (or presumably in agreement or disagreement) and treat them accordingly. In other words, it’s all about Q. Interesting.

[David Chase]

It’s part of Q-ology……..
”If a group of 3 or more people disagree with you, they are paid to do so.”

[gas_dr]

They refer to it as the disinformation dozen. I did not consult that website. However there is little support in the medical and science community for these hucksters. They have demonstrably lined their wallets with their anti vaccine stance.

In my judgment they are opportunistic and pronounce with great authority unfounded results. Take the above post. Kirsch had a graph predicting high mortality at 10 years. Yet the main complaint of Q theory is no long term studies. How with a straight face can such a rock ribbed prediction be made with the complaint about not studied long enough. It’s laughable.

The fact of the matter is breathlessly worrying about dark field studies that are suspect as hell and pointing to conditions (if they exist) of no relevance os absurd. Take for example the breathless report of rouleaux early this week. It’s clot shots don’t you know. Actually the differential is quite large it was seen often even before covid vaccination. And it’s clinical significance is not all that much except for the presence can lead to certain diagnoses.

It’s the difference between repeating and understanding info.

As for the dirty dozen, they have made a lot of money stoking fires of at best marginal evidence leading many to bad conclusions. This is my problem with them. The scientific process allows for great room for interpretation.

The data are clear. The quantity and severity of complication from covid vaccination is not nearly as much as the Q theorists would like everyone to believe. When confronted with extrapolations that are of questionable validity there is no other response beside being called names and threatened. The aggregate of the data do not near that significant complications are occurring in a majority of recipients.

As was pointed out above 260 million people have received at least on covid vaccination. But instead of dealing with the data, unsubstantiated assumptions are made about conspiracy. If you want to refute the credibility of data it simply must be more than certain people do not believe the institution that published it. Cross referencing from multiple sources the 260 million miner is about correct.

People are not dying at now 2.5 years of strange things related to this vaccination

People are not sticking to flag poles when they walk by them.

There is no substantial data there is s programmed explosion of death coming.

And again you have ignored my question. If you believe murder has occurred name the elements of the crime and name the suspects. File police reports. Make complaints. Your lack of answering direct questions about your arguments and language clearly speaks volumes as to your veracity as someone who believes in what they are saying.

So i ask again directly. You represent you have evidence of a crime. Have you pursued it with law enforcement? If not, perhaps you should express your opinion as you mean it instead of dishonestly.

[David Chase]

Excellent point!!

That’s what everything circles back (LOL) to.

It’s all because, and about Q.

The Original Anti-Vaxxers were Q Followers.

Around the same time the Anti-Vax people began finding each other, Q stopped posting!

The Vax is a Q replacement Conspiracy.

Think Methadone as a replacement for Heroin.

[gas_dr]

Sure. Baylor college of medicine revoked McCollughs privileges and sued him based on false representation of his credentials. It’s really easy to research. But since you asked, here is the most egregious of his errors. This is odd the top of my head. His questionable ethics are long reviewed and published. Lying about being on staff where you are not and never have been is professional suicide in medicine.

[gas_dr]

Q theory is the term I have coined to avoid other language that would be more pejorative. So you not believe that there is a general theory adhered to by members who seem to post on Q forums or host them?

What is the problem with defining it this way?

Certainly assertions about data are made. This is the definition of a theory. Where have I mispoken, sir?

[Allegra]

How many times have I posted that the question of whether or not to get vaccinated is now moot? Because the vaccines are no longer effective against the new Omicron variants, and besides, the newest variants are mild. There’s no real benefit to getting vaccinated now. Why bother, even if you think they are 100% safe?

I’ve noticed the hoopla died down considerably a few months ago. Even my work (DoD contractor) backed off their mandate last December when the government backed off. My company alone stood to lose 30-40% of us and this was industry-wide. The Raytheons and McDonnell-Douglases were facing roughly the same. When I said “no,” and prepared to be unemployed by their December 8 deadline last year, I was uplifted over the next few days when I found out just how many people were also saying “no” and getting ready to bail.

My boss was cajoling me to request a religious exemption. I told him, “Let’s see who blinks first.” Obiden blinked first. 😁

That’s why I’m curious as to why there are still Pfizer Covid vax commercials on TV currently. As of now. I think I saw one as recently as this morning. They’re still big-time shilling for that injection.

[Jet Jaguar]

Allegra,

Saw this change on USAJOBS on Friday.

To ensure compliance with an applicable preliminary nationwide injunction, which may be supplemented, modified or vacated, depending on the course of ongoing litigation, the federal government will take no action to implement or enforce the COVID-19 vaccination requirement pursuant to Executive Order 14043 on Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees. Therefore, to the extent a federal job announcement includes the requirement that applicants must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 pursuant to Executive Order 14043, that requirement does not currently apply.

FWIW

[Allegra]

Thanks, Jet. Yes, I’ve seen that statement before.

CEOs were panicking, wondering how their companies would be able to perform the government projects. Just on the program I work with, they were going to hemorrhage a slew of engineers which right there would have made it pretty much impossible to perform the work. When you factored in how many of us in the Program Management Office were saying “screw this,” they knew they’d be up the creek.

We knew it was the Obiden wieners pushing this, but we maintained that it was up to the companies’ leadership to stand up.

[gas_dr]

1. I agree the vaccines did not prevent universally transmission or disease. I did observe and continue to hold the position that vaccines prevented adverse disease and death to an incredibly high level as it pertains to delta strain.

2. As I have said, I no longer recommend vaccination to people of low risk factor. Omicron is a highly transmissible not dangerous disease. It’s the dreaded summer cold, which ironically have always been corona virus species.

3. I do hold that the vaccinations are safe. The data presented and hyperbole of clot shots are not borne out as clinically significant. The hospital is not full of thromboembolic events and strokes across 260 million people.

You are one of the first to ask my opinion

I think vaccines for us through an unusual genetic shift which causss a pandemic. I am open to the fact that the shift may have been artificially created. My guess is it was gain of function research that is clearly forbidden that for out. I think Fauci funded it and is culpable

I think the disease has now become endemic and essentially not dangerous at all. I am not seeing high numbers of deaths daily related to LRI and ARDS

I think that the great thing to come out of this was monoclonal antibody treatments. They did not seem to be objectionable to those who were wary of vaccination so provided s good and reasonable treatment that covid specific and incredibly efficacious.

I think that they gross politicization of this whole process with the instant blathering of people using social media is what has driven this. I think people will gravitate to what they want to believe nor what the data show

I think it’s over. It was a particularly harsh pandemic but it has followed all the rules of pandemics. The question is can we learn lessons from it or are we simply going to remain committed to division

Again thanks for your question.

[grey_whiskers]

Lunch room food fight / cats in a sack.

If you actually wish to be informed, stop trolling Q threads
and find a link to a repository which has only Q posts without commentary, and read from the earliest to the latest.

There have been many people giving themselves out as either “really being Q” or having back channels to Q, or whatnot.
But they were lying: way early on, Q posted “no outside comms.”

And it came out over time, some of the Q posts were either aimed at Deep Staters, or designed to bluff or spook them.

[grey_whiskers]

And here we learn you judge others by whether they are “ideologically neutral towards Q” (or presumably in agreement or disagreement) and treat them accordingly. In other words, it’s all about Q. Interesting.

Lying through your foul teeth as usual, as though it is your handlers' assignment to you, or an idee fixe (screw the accent marks, I'm in a hurry).

I don't judge people by whether they're ideologically neutral towards Q. But one of the ways to judge trolls on the jabs, is they seek to drag non-existent "Q theory" into the discussion and brand those pushing against expanded or mandatory jabs, as conspiracy freaks who fall for anything, such as Q theories. Like here where you wrote:

"As for the Q tie-in, that’s legitimate. After Q stopped dropping and you’d worn out the “Ashli Babbitt was a crisis actor and isn’t really dead and it was all fake blood” type stuff, you switched to Covid, then when the vaccines rolled out you became obsessed with vaxx doomers. Nearly every article posted here from some clickbait vaxx doomer site run by grifters was posted by active posters on the Special Q Thread (your little snowflake sanctuary where none may challenge your nutty conspiracy theories about such things Biden’s earlobes, the Pence family’s dead bunny, and Trump retaining possession of the nuclear football to this very day.). These articles claimed the vaccines contained all sorts of preposterous things, including teeny weeny razor blades, tiny mechanical octopuses, wiggly wormy parasites, and King Cobra snake venom."

"People who get sucked into one conspiracy theory tend to get sucked into more. Like those who believe the moon landing was a hoax are more likely to believe in the chemtrail thing and that the Sandy Hook shooting was fake and all were “crisis actors”. Hence the plethora of conspiracy theories embraced by Q followers. And you are a die-hard Q follower yourself. "

Sod off, lying troll.

[Magnatron]

1. I agree the vaccines did not prevent universally transmission or disease. I did observe and continue to hold the position that vaccines prevented adverse disease and death to an incredibly high level as it pertains to delta strain.

Okay, I’ve been watching this thread with bemusement, but this one always cracks me up. We’ve heard ad infinitum about how these “vaccines” keep people from getting “as sick”.

Exactly what the hell does that mean?

After it became obvious that these “vaccines” weren’t vaccines, the argument turned to them being merely treatments. You won’t get “as sick” if you get them Fauci and his minions would say. Never once, do they quantify what that means.

“As sick” as what?

“As sick” you won’t die?

“As sick” you won’t end up in the hospital?

As a matter of fact, most people who got Covid — by far — didn’t get “as sick” as those, vaccinated or not. It’s a meaningless term that is bandied about to attempt to desperately give some meaning to why people should throw away common sense and jump into the pharma line.

You need to have a better argument than not getting “as sick”. And thus far, I haven’t seen that, from you, or any of the other pharma/CDC sycophants on this page or in the public realm…

[grey_whiskers]

To tell the story with pictures...

[gas_dr]

I dont troll q threads, only when named in them do I bother and then someone has to tell me I was mentioned as there is no ethics to ping someone about whom they are talking.

When i read the actual threads, my judgment is a lot of group think and little data except the same sources. The most recent example is 100 professionals worldwide want the vaccinations stopped (and call themselved something with the word ethics in it), Thats 100/ over 9 million health care providers. I would argue that it is hardly representative. But like clockwork, it is now being hearlded as the gospel truth.

[gas_dr]

Seriously. I meant exactly what I said in response to a question. The fact that you want to cherry pick a specific sentence in the larger answer is intellectually dishonest.

Please consider the totality of my post to a different person who had a genuine question and get back to me. Don’t engage in Q theory and practice where a single sentence is taken out of context and then twisted like a pretzel.

[Allegra]

#395 - LOL - nails it.

[grey_whiskers]

Thats 100/ over 9 million health care providers. I would argue that it is hardly representative.

And....another leftist troll self-identifies LOUDLY.

Only leftists "feel" that the truth or falsity of a scientific proposition, is proved by taking a vote.

But at the same time they are the ones who loudly shout
"I F***ING LOVE SCIENCE!"

Nice going, Doctor gassy.

[CatHerd]

Huh? The Hill is not Q theory? Sorry, I don’t follow. Who is claiming that? Sorry, I’m having trouble making sense out of this.

I have never, ever tried to tie erroneous articles about the vaccines to “rightwing extremists”, nor have I ever called Q followers “rightwing extremists”. I don’t believe all the things many Q followers do, true. Unlike the pearl-clutching lefties, I do not think Q followers are “dangerous” but rather that those lefties are paranoid. If you guys believe Trump is still president, etc, want to do your numerology and inspect people’s tie and dress patterns and jewelry for clues, check out earlobes and whatnot, that seems pretty harmless to me.

I have plainly stated the vaccines have side effects. The more serious include elevated risk of myocarditis and a likely elevated risk of Shingles outbreak. I don’t think it’s been proven that they cause you to get HIV/AIDS, malaria, instant metastatic breast cancer, and a number of other things that have been claimed here on FR.

If anyone politely and dispassionately points out a flaw in a “study” in some dodgy blog posted here, they are viciously attacked. Why get so bent out of shape?

I am tired of being explaining why I object to whacky, false and easily disproved claims. You well know it is because I am firmly anti-mandate and such nonsense undermines that cause. Secondly, all these claims about preposterous things like nano octopuses, wiggly little parasites, itty bitty razor blades, nabobots that enable mind control via 5G, etc., make us look like bunch of kooks if no one disputes them from our side.

Why are they carrying on about a fall surge and pushing boosters? Well, there’s an election in the fall, right? Time for more scaremongering, demands for mail-in ballots. Same schtick as before. Only this time it looks like they may well fail. Everybody is sick and tired of hearing about Covid, of lockdowns, and only a pitiful few are really worried about the new kinder, gentler Omicron variants. Besides, we’ve nearly all already had the Omicron.

Some of it is power-drunk Dems who a get high off issuing capricious and harmful decrees, like the DC mayor who decreed all children must be vaccinated to attend school.

I’d like facts and truth on our side, not false and easily disproved claims. I think we stand a better chance of fighting back effectively with facts and truth and are weakened by crying wolf over and over. You may think differently, and that’s your prerogative.