Q theory is the term I have coined to avoid other language that would be more pejorative. So you not believe that there is a general theory adhered to by members who seem to post on Q forums or host them?
What is the problem with defining it this way?
Certainly assertions about data are made. This is the definition of a theory. Where have I mispoken, sir?
Lunch room food fight / cats in a sack.
If you actually wish to be informed, stop trolling Q threads
and find a link to a repository which has only Q posts without commentary, and read from the earliest to the latest.
There have been many people giving themselves out as either “really being Q” or having back channels to Q, or whatnot.
But they were lying: way early on, Q posted “no outside comms.”
And it came out over time, some of the Q posts were either aimed at Deep Staters, or designed to bluff or spook them.