Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers; David Chase

>>>>Re your “You mean like entropy12 saying verbatim (post 359) “It is best to ignore Allegra” and posts to Allegra “Look in the mirror, you’ll see the real fake.” while within a post or two of that, Fury writes to entropy to “Knock it off”.”<<<<<

Pot. Kettle. Considering all your posts to others liberally peppered with insults and name calling, this is rich. You regularly call me a “troll” and tell me to “get rekt” in nearly post. Like this one you just made:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=370#370

And here we learn you judge others by whether they are “ideologically neutral towards Q” (or presumably in agreement or disagreement) and treat them accordingly. In other words, it’s all about Q. Interesting.


382 posted on 08/28/2022 5:17:25 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]


To: CatHerd

Excellent point!!

That’s what everything circles back (LOL) to.

It’s all because, and about Q.

The Original Anti-Vaxxers were Q Followers.

Around the same time the Anti-Vax people began finding each other, Q stopped posting!

The Vax is a Q replacement Conspiracy.

Think Methadone as a replacement for Heroin.


385 posted on 08/28/2022 5:27:16 PM PDT by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

To: CatHerd
And here we learn you judge others by whether they are “ideologically neutral towards Q” (or presumably in agreement or disagreement) and treat them accordingly. In other words, it’s all about Q. Interesting.

Lying through your foul teeth as usual, as though it is your handlers' assignment to you, or an idee fixe (screw the accent marks, I'm in a hurry).

I don't judge people by whether they're ideologically neutral towards Q. But one of the ways to judge trolls on the jabs, is they seek to drag non-existent "Q theory" into the discussion and brand those pushing against expanded or mandatory jabs, as conspiracy freaks who fall for anything, such as Q theories. Like here where you wrote:

"As for the Q tie-in, that’s legitimate. After Q stopped dropping and you’d worn out the “Ashli Babbitt was a crisis actor and isn’t really dead and it was all fake blood” type stuff, you switched to Covid, then when the vaccines rolled out you became obsessed with vaxx doomers. Nearly every article posted here from some clickbait vaxx doomer site run by grifters was posted by active posters on the Special Q Thread (your little snowflake sanctuary where none may challenge your nutty conspiracy theories about such things Biden’s earlobes, the Pence family’s dead bunny, and Trump retaining possession of the nuclear football to this very day.). These articles claimed the vaccines contained all sorts of preposterous things, including teeny weeny razor blades, tiny mechanical octopuses, wiggly wormy parasites, and King Cobra snake venom."

"People who get sucked into one conspiracy theory tend to get sucked into more. Like those who believe the moon landing was a hoax are more likely to believe in the chemtrail thing and that the Sandy Hook shooting was fake and all were “crisis actors”. Hence the plethora of conspiracy theories embraced by Q followers. And you are a die-hard Q follower yourself. "

Sod off, lying troll.

393 posted on 08/28/2022 5:55:06 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson