Huh? The Hill is not Q theory? Sorry, I don’t follow. Who is claiming that? Sorry, I’m having trouble making sense out of this.
I have never, ever tried to tie erroneous articles about the vaccines to “rightwing extremists”, nor have I ever called Q followers “rightwing extremists”. I don’t believe all the things many Q followers do, true. Unlike the pearl-clutching lefties, I do not think Q followers are “dangerous” but rather that those lefties are paranoid. If you guys believe Trump is still president, etc, want to do your numerology and inspect people’s tie and dress patterns and jewelry for clues, check out earlobes and whatnot, that seems pretty harmless to me.
I have plainly stated the vaccines have side effects. The more serious include elevated risk of myocarditis and a likely elevated risk of Shingles outbreak. I don’t think it’s been proven that they cause you to get HIV/AIDS, malaria, instant metastatic breast cancer, and a number of other things that have been claimed here on FR.
If anyone politely and dispassionately points out a flaw in a “study” in some dodgy blog posted here, they are viciously attacked. Why get so bent out of shape?
I am tired of being explaining why I object to whacky, false and easily disproved claims. You well know it is because I am firmly anti-mandate and such nonsense undermines that cause. Secondly, all these claims about preposterous things like nano octopuses, wiggly little parasites, itty bitty razor blades, nabobots that enable mind control via 5G, etc., make us look like bunch of kooks if no one disputes them from our side.
Why are they carrying on about a fall surge and pushing boosters? Well, there’s an election in the fall, right? Time for more scaremongering, demands for mail-in ballots. Same schtick as before. Only this time it looks like they may well fail. Everybody is sick and tired of hearing about Covid, of lockdowns, and only a pitiful few are really worried about the new kinder, gentler Omicron variants. Besides, we’ve nearly all already had the Omicron.
Some of it is power-drunk Dems who a get high off issuing capricious and harmful decrees, like the DC mayor who decreed all children must be vaccinated to attend school.
I’d like facts and truth on our side, not false and easily disproved claims. I think we stand a better chance of fighting back effectively with facts and truth and are weakened by crying wolf over and over. You may think differently, and that’s your prerogative.
You're lying again.
You falsely present ALL opposition to the jabs as though it is inspired by the most radical, unsubstantiated claims. Like this post.
And perform massive ad hominem attacks both against doctors going against the jabs, like this post:
All this crazy fake garbage obscures the valid reasons and hurts the anti-mandate cause. I am interested in facts and the truth. These vax doomer blogs are very, very short on both and very, very long on scaremongering, bad math, bad science and grifting.
And while they call us "$hot$hill" and "paid Pfizer troll" for disagreeing with their bogus claims about tiny razor blades in the vaccines, etc., the vax doomer grifters rake in millions. And they (and apparently at one time perhaps the Russians) recruit paid vax doomer "influencers": https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57928647
and this post:
It’s their goal to drive all who question their bogus claims off FR and turn this place into one giant Special Q Thread. They openly brag about that, even on the main board, and crow over running off good longtime Freepers. They apparently can’t stand any criticism of these bogus claims, but rather than keeping them on their Special Q Thread where they would be protected from critical analysis of these claims, they post them on the main board, including on threads totally unrelated to Covid. Then get all nasty if anyone challenges them. They aren’t content with what they have been given and want the whole enchillada.
Stuff it.