All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

substack.com ^ | June 10, 2022 | A Midwestern Doctor

[ransomnote]

A few days ago I posted an article suggesting the mRNA vaccines were causing a spike in disability. Since that time the story has gone viral, I’ve had more time to look at the data, others have as well, and I now feel the case is very strong. Because this message is critically important, I am writing a second follow up article on the topic. In this article I will attempt to present a comprehensive analysis, and put the data into context with my experience of having worked with individuals with COVID vaccine injuries and individuals with varying degrees of disability including those seeking disability.

The initial discover of this dataset was Ed Dowd (the Blackrock executive who broke the story of the spike in life insurance claims following the vaccine rollout). He shared this dataset (which can be verified here):

Let’s quickly annotate that to put it into context:

 

MORE AT LINK: All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

 

[grey_whiskers]

Re: “In the interview, Martin says the 700 million figure is from the vax-pushers’ own estimates/assertions.”

So you just take this as fact based on this guy’s say-so? No proof, no quotes from these evil “vax-pushers”? Nothing but his say so?

You're moving the goal-posts.

I'll give you some of the left-over WD-40 from gassy's goal posts.

I smell your flop sweat from here.

[grey_whiskers]

Oops! The link to your recent post about Naomi Wolfe somehow got left out. Here it is:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=156#156

Lying again. That link goes to a reproduction of a post by Marina Medvin, quoting results from Pfizer's own studies on the jab, in which 44% of the pregnant women in Pfizer's own trial had a miscarriage.

You never were very good, but now you're getting so flustered, you're making elementary mistakes.

Troll.

[CatHerd]

It says “According to Naomi Wolfe”.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=156#156

Go back and read it yourself. She has lost all her old academic cred after being proven a sloppy researcher who made outrageous errors back before she she started bandwagon hopping and spouting nutty conspiracy theories. Her last book was so full of errors her publisher had to pulp all the copies. Yet we’re supposed to take her word about her crowd-sourced study”? Ha!

[Jane Long]

Tangled web, and, all.

[Jane Long]

No one believes their whopper/gvt provided, or, pulled out of their backside lies, anymore, any how.

They need to crawl back under their rocks.

[grey_whiskers]

Your post #177 said verbatim: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=177#177 You ignore all the other points (like the Lancet study saying no such thing), but try to dance around the stuff you post.

How about this one?

None other than Naomi Wolfe! Here's more from her:

followed by

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=178#178 Oops! The link to your recent post about Naomi Wolfe somehow got left out. Here it is:

and the screenshot:

Note the screenshot, is of a totally different person, who is posting a screenshot of a newspaper article, which then lists Wolfe as a source.

But what you are suppressing, is the commentary from the person doing the posting, that is is internal Pfizer documents, which were ordered released by a judge, over Pfizer's objections.

That's not at all me relying on Wolfe, still less is me posting, or relying on, her remarks about overhearing a conversation about tachyons.

But it IS you trying to blow squid ink to avoid news from within Pfizer that they knew about miscarriages GOING IN.

Troll.

[Labyrinthos]

The skeptic in me says BS to any article the starts with “all evidence” and “viral.”

First, SSI disability claims can take years to review and process and so I doubt that the alleged increase in disability claims is attributable to the jab. Second, relatively few people have private disability insurance, and the policies often have very high standards and require medical exams and vocational training before they pay out. Third, even if disability claims are on the upswing, the jab is only one of several possibilities and perhaps the least likely cause. More likely, people are filing for disability because they don’t want return to the workplace after working from home in their jammies for 2+ years.

[bagster]

I will ignore your silly accusations and name calling as not worth my time or attention.

Typing that sentence is the opposite of ignoring and proves that silly accusations and name calling are completely worth your time or attention.

People who get sucked into one conspiracy theory tend to get sucked into more. Like those who believe the moon landing was a hoax are more likely to believe in the chemtrail thing and that the Sandy Hook shooting was fake and all were “crisis actors”. Hence the plethora of conspiracy theories embraced by Q followers. And you are a die-hard Q follower yourself.

What I find interesting about your (and people like you) thought process here is, you were and still are completely sucked into the entire covid/vax deep state psyop. You go to great lengths to defend the perpetrators even after the entire operation is outed for what it is.

It don't get more 'conspiracy theorist' than that. Then you go on the internet waving your oh so superior arms around insulting people who have the temerity to think for themselves and listen to the truth tellers who go against your government/deep state 'narrative'.

We are the shepherds and you are the sheep.

I know it hurts someone as prideful and arrogant as yourself. Rub some dirt on it.

[humblegunner]

LOST ‘em? Them chicks ought to pay attention to where they leave stuff.

And, assuming accuracy....

None of ‘em was any kin of mine.
None of ‘em was owing me money.
None of ‘em were valued employees.
None of ‘em are actually named.
None of ‘em had anything nice to say about me.

Not exactly a recipe for deep caring, is it?

[humblegunner]

We are the shepherds and you are the sheep.

And what would you be without some sheeps?

Some crazy old goober wandering around yelling at nothing?

[bagster]

None of ‘em had anything nice to say about me.

Why should they be any different than the rest of the world's population?

[humblegunner]

Why should they be any different than the rest of the world's population?

Oh, pshaw.

I can think of a least six that might.

[bagster]

And what would you be without some sheeps?

I would be the master of the universe, making appearances among the mortals like the Greek Gods of old.

Instead, I got to run around taking care of you sub-human normies.

#WhiteMansBurden

[bagster]

I can think of a least six that might.

Your stuffed animals don't count, goofy.

[nesnah]

And what would you be without some sheeps?

---

thimblehumper would be nothing without his adoration of Hoft’s little friend.

[humblegunner]

I would be the master of the universe, making appearances among the mortals

It's good to have goals.

[grey_whiskers]

More likely, people are filing for disability because they don’t want return to the workplace after working from home in their jammies for 2+ years.

I like the cynical way you think.

In the same vein, on the other side:

Q. "How many people work for the Social Security Administration?"

A. "About half of them."

"We pretend to be disabled and they pretend to give us benefits." /American style communism>

[CatHerd]

What you are missing is this “newspaper article”* is quoting Naomi Wolfe, and only Naomi Wolfe, who claims her “crowdsourced project” to analyze the Pfizer documents found that 50% miscarried. So you are trusting Wolfe’s word and her “crowdsourced project” if you believe it.

Here’s the link to the actual “newspaper article”:

https://www.theflstandard.com/massacre-nearly-half-of-pregnant-women-in-pfizer-trial-miscarried/

As it turns out, Wolfe is still a very sloppy researcher. You see, she (or her “crowdsourced researchers”) double counted the miscarriages. Each miscarriage, along with its unique event number, was listed under “all adverse events” and again under “serious adverse events”. So there were 11 total miscarriages, not 22.

The “newspaper article” links to the “article” making the claim on Wolfe’s website, by someone called “Berberine on Gettr”

To her credit, Berberine has since noted that she was called out on this by The Naked Emperor and Phil Kerson. (But shame on her for truncating Kerpen’s finding.)

Naked Emperor (most is behind paywall, and sorry, not paying)

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/fact-checking-the-claim-that-44-of

Phil Kerpen (better analysis than The Naked Emperor anyway):

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html

Not only is it 11 miscarriages (not 20) but the total number of pregnancies is unknown because only 3 of the women who miscarried are on the list of the 50 who became pregnant after the first dose. As the trial excluded pregnant women, there must have been an unknown (as yet) number who were pregnant without realizing it before the first dose. Perhaps there is yet another table of women who became pregnant after the second dose. Whichever, 8 of the women who miscarried are missing from the list of 50. Therefore, the total number of pregnant women is unknown at this time.

As Phil Kerpen wrote:

---

“If we go back to the table of 50 pregnancies and mark the miscarriages we find only 3 of the 11 subject IDs. Presumably the other 8 were pregnant before dose 1. But we don’t have the denominator for that to figure a rate.

So really all we can say is that at the timepoint when the file was generated there had been 11 miscarriages after Pfizer vaccine.

To further clarify, we cannot say 22% because it’s not 11 out of 50. It’s only 3 out of 50; the 11 is out of an unknown denominator.”

---

The normal rate of miscarriage is between 10% and 20% (although researchers say it is likely much higher, as very early in a pregnancy a woman may not know she was pregnant and miscarried).

3 out of 50 is 6%, which seems too low at first glance, but, given the tiny sample size of 50, not surprising. Small samples can yield skewed results. So we can’t say the miscarriage rate was only 6%. Until they find the pages with the table of women who were unknowingly pregnant before the first dose, we cannot figure the actual rate of miscarriage.

According to this article:

---

Pregnant people were not included in the initial clinical trial, so participants would have been unaware of their pregnancies at the trial’s start and early in pregnancy at the time of the Pfizer report. Of the 270 pregnancies reported during the trial, 238 were ongoing at the time of the report, while the remaining 32 pregnancies had ended, with 28 resulting in miscarriage. Pfizer’s data shows that at the time of the report, 10.4 percent of the pregnancies had ended in miscarriage, which is well within the normal miscarriage rate of 10 to 20 percent. Emphasizing that data from multiple other studies show that COVID-19 vaccination does not increase miscarriage risk is recommended, as is explaining that vaccination is safe and recommended for people who are pregnant and breastfeeding or anyone trying to become pregnant in the future.”

Link: https://publichealthcollaborative.org/misinformation-alert/post-claims-pfizer-vaccine-caused-miscarriages-during-clinical-trial/

Link given to other studies: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/09/covid-19-vaccines-dont-raise-miscarriage-risk-3-studies-show

---

*”The Florida Standard” is not a newspaper. It’s a brandy new website run by “social media influencer” Will Witt which was registered on June 27 of this year.

Will Witt:

https://www.prageru.com/presenters/will-witt

[Radix]

Since none seem to have remarked this Post, I suppose that I can address it. As you said ‘Physicians are Clinicians who practice at bedside and takes care (of) patients.’ Well, I worked intimately close with dozens, more likely hundreds of ‘Covid Patients.’ In fact every single Patient who entered my Hospital's ER was automatically presumed to be Covid positive.

This was quite distressing to my Department as we always received the call to contend with these infectious Patients. The truth is that those bedside Physicians in our ICU never got within 10 feet of a bed for a year at least. They did their Rounding from outside of the rooms. They used the Nurses remote monitors to track vital signs and computer reports for ventilator settings.

The only time that Physicians entered those rooms were for Codes, Intubations, or procedures such as inserting A-Lines. There was no ‘bedside management’ happening. Certainly I do presume that this was the case in other large hospitals. I cannot know that, but it seems quite likely.

That was good times, Physicians ‘rounding’ from yards away from the Patients, shielded by protective doors and other barriers. I would attest to this in a Court while under oath. This stuff went on for more than a year. Meanwhile it was all ‘try this, try that.’ They were tweaking ventilator settings constantly as those young Interns and Residents were clearly mystified. Fine, let me get it. They had us donning and doffing constantly according to the protocol.

Hypertensive Patients were on ventilator settings which made absolutely no sense whatsoever. It is incredible that one such as myself could make such a difference in people's lives, but I did so. Me, some kid from the Projects was saving lives regularly, despite the best efforts of those ‘bedside professionals’ to guess their way into figuring shit out and placing them in jeopardy of expiration in hours or sooner.

Few will ever know of what I and my Associates were able to do. We do not get the spotlight. The TV Crews do not come to us and ask about how difficult things were. I have had ‘Doctors’ inquire of such banal things. ‘What is `BiPAP?’ I fixed so much shit during my time and almost none will ever know. It is OK, because I know. You Sir or Ma’am clearly do not.

[CatHerd]

Correction: Wolfe claimed 44%, not 50%. I was going by the “newspaper” headline claim of “nearly half” when I first started typing. 44% is still very, very wrong, of course.