[CatHerd]

It says “According to Naomi Wolfe”.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=156#156

Go back and read it yourself. She has lost all her old academic cred after being proven a sloppy researcher who made outrageous errors back before she she started bandwagon hopping and spouting nutty conspiracy theories. Her last book was so full of errors her publisher had to pulp all the copies. Yet we’re supposed to take her word about her crowd-sourced study”? Ha!

[grey_whiskers]

Your post #177 said verbatim: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=177#177 You ignore all the other points (like the Lancet study saying no such thing), but try to dance around the stuff you post.

How about this one?

None other than Naomi Wolfe! Here's more from her:

followed by

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=178#178 Oops! The link to your recent post about Naomi Wolfe somehow got left out. Here it is:

and the screenshot:

Note the screenshot, is of a totally different person, who is posting a screenshot of a newspaper article, which then lists Wolfe as a source.

But what you are suppressing, is the commentary from the person doing the posting, that is is internal Pfizer documents, which were ordered released by a judge, over Pfizer's objections.

That's not at all me relying on Wolfe, still less is me posting, or relying on, her remarks about overhearing a conversation about tachyons.

But it IS you trying to blow squid ink to avoid news from within Pfizer that they knew about miscarriages GOING IN.

Troll.