Your post #177 said verbatim: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=177#177
You ignore all the other points (like the Lancet study saying no such thing), but try to dance around the stuff you post.How about this one?
None other than Naomi Wolfe! Here's more from her:
followed by
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=178#178 Oops! The link to your recent post about Naomi Wolfe somehow got left out. Here it is:
and the screenshot:
Note the screenshot, is of a totally different person, who is posting a screenshot of a newspaper article, which then lists Wolfe as a source.
But what you are suppressing, is the commentary from the person doing the posting, that is is internal Pfizer documents, which were ordered released by a judge, over Pfizer's objections.
That's not at all me relying on Wolfe, still less is me posting, or relying on, her remarks about overhearing a conversation about tachyons.
But it IS you trying to blow squid ink to avoid news from within Pfizer that they knew about miscarriages GOING IN.
Troll.
What you are missing is this “newspaper article”* is quoting Naomi Wolfe, and only Naomi Wolfe, who claims her “crowdsourced project” to analyze the Pfizer documents found that 50% miscarried. So you are trusting Wolfe’s word and her “crowdsourced project” if you believe it.
Here’s the link to the actual “newspaper article”:
https://www.theflstandard.com/massacre-nearly-half-of-pregnant-women-in-pfizer-trial-miscarried/
As it turns out, Wolfe is still a very sloppy researcher. You see, she (or her “crowdsourced researchers”) double counted the miscarriages. Each miscarriage, along with its unique event number, was listed under “all adverse events” and again under “serious adverse events”. So there were 11 total miscarriages, not 22.
The “newspaper article” links to the “article” making the claim on Wolfe’s website, by someone called “Berberine on Gettr”
To her credit, Berberine has since noted that she was called out on this by The Naked Emperor and Phil Kerson. (But shame on her for truncating Kerpen’s finding.)
Naked Emperor (most is behind paywall, and sorry, not paying)
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/fact-checking-the-claim-that-44-of
Phil Kerpen (better analysis than The Naked Emperor anyway):
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html
Not only is it 11 miscarriages (not 20) but the total number of pregnancies is unknown because only 3 of the women who miscarried are on the list of the 50 who became pregnant after the first dose. As the trial excluded pregnant women, there must have been an unknown (as yet) number who were pregnant without realizing it before the first dose. Perhaps there is yet another table of women who became pregnant after the second dose. Whichever, 8 of the women who miscarried are missing from the list of 50. Therefore, the total number of pregnant women is unknown at this time.
As Phil Kerpen wrote:
“If we go back to the table of 50 pregnancies and mark the miscarriages we find only 3 of the 11 subject IDs. Presumably the other 8 were pregnant before dose 1. But we don’t have the denominator for that to figure a rate.
So really all we can say is that at the timepoint when the file was generated there had been 11 miscarriages after Pfizer vaccine.
To further clarify, we cannot say 22% because it’s not 11 out of 50. It’s only 3 out of 50; the 11 is out of an unknown denominator.”
The normal rate of miscarriage is between 10% and 20% (although researchers say it is likely much higher, as very early in a pregnancy a woman may not know she was pregnant and miscarried).
3 out of 50 is 6%, which seems too low at first glance, but, given the tiny sample size of 50, not surprising. Small samples can yield skewed results. So we can’t say the miscarriage rate was only 6%. Until they find the pages with the table of women who were unknowingly pregnant before the first dose, we cannot figure the actual rate of miscarriage.
According to this article:
Pregnant people were not included in the initial clinical trial, so participants would have been unaware of their pregnancies at the trial’s start and early in pregnancy at the time of the Pfizer report. Of the 270 pregnancies reported during the trial, 238 were ongoing at the time of the report, while the remaining 32 pregnancies had ended, with 28 resulting in miscarriage. Pfizer’s data shows that at the time of the report, 10.4 percent of the pregnancies had ended in miscarriage, which is well within the normal miscarriage rate of 10 to 20 percent. Emphasizing that data from multiple other studies show that COVID-19 vaccination does not increase miscarriage risk is recommended, as is explaining that vaccination is safe and recommended for people who are pregnant and breastfeeding or anyone trying to become pregnant in the future.”
Link: https://publichealthcollaborative.org/misinformation-alert/post-claims-pfizer-vaccine-caused-miscarriages-during-clinical-trial/
Link given to other studies: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/09/covid-19-vaccines-dont-raise-miscarriage-risk-3-studies-show
*”The Florida Standard” is not a newspaper. It’s a brandy new website run by “social media influencer” Will Witt which was registered on June 27 of this year.
Will Witt:
https://www.prageru.com/presenters/will-witt