All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

substack.com ^ | June 10, 2022 | A Midwestern Doctor

[ransomnote]

A few days ago I posted an article suggesting the mRNA vaccines were causing a spike in disability. Since that time the story has gone viral, I’ve had more time to look at the data, others have as well, and I now feel the case is very strong. Because this message is critically important, I am writing a second follow up article on the topic. In this article I will attempt to present a comprehensive analysis, and put the data into context with my experience of having worked with individuals with COVID vaccine injuries and individuals with varying degrees of disability including those seeking disability.

The initial discover of this dataset was Ed Dowd (the Blackrock executive who broke the story of the spike in life insurance claims following the vaccine rollout). He shared this dataset (which can be verified here):

Let’s quickly annotate that to put it into context:

 

MORE AT LINK: All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

 

[Jane Long]

I’d bet money that one of the chief poo flingers of the Q $hot $hill kooks squad is here to gin up dissension and stupidity.

Fixed it.

See how that projection Bea Ess works, vax tool?

[stylin19a]

Answered ? not hardly and you know it.

Nobody looked at Dr. Kory's analysis. Dr. Mark certainly didn't and it appears you didn't either. Because of "anomalies" in Uttar Pradesh mortality data, their data wasn't included in the excess death report. No mention of anything else about Uttar Pradesh handling of COVID.

Money quotes ?

“While there are claims that the state began using ivermectin in May 2021, during the height of India's COVID-19 crisis, the government actually said it began giving the drug in August 2020.”

What claims ? and by who of a start date 5/2021 ? Dr. Kory specifically notes 08/2020 start date.

“Not only did it not hasten the end of that alpha wave, but it didn't prevent the delta wave.”

Ivermectin is not a vaccine. Where was it suppose to end the alpha phase and prevent delta ?

Dr. Mark also cited research where scientists looked at data for all deaths in India, and found that certain populous districts in Uttar Pradesh had no reported deaths at all for several months.
“So either you have to believe that ivermectin prevents you from dying of everything — car crashes, cancer, homicide, suicide — or, that the data is just garbage and you can't interpret it.”

The problem with this is, the first part is taken from "Preliminary Analysis of Excess Mortality in India During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Update August 4, 2021)" (ps. There is an update Sept.2021) and all versions of this report have this disclaimer:
"This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice."
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.04.21261604v2.full-text

Yet you and Dr. Mark are taking it as gospel ?

And the last part(“So either you have to believe that ivermectin prevents you from dying of everything — car crashes, cancer, homicide, suicide — or, that the data is just garbage and you can't interpret it.”) is Dr. Mark's throw away opinion on Uttar Pradesh mortality data.

However, the report concludes this:
"Summing these estimates for 2020 and 2021, we estimate the pandemic-related mortality to be: 132.9 to 194.4 per 100,000 population for the entire pandemic (through June 30, 2021, Table 5). Assuming a population of India of 1,352,642,280, these rates correspond with a mortality range of 1.80 to 2.63 million people perishing during the pandemic in India from Covid-19 by June 30, 2021.

If the data from Uttar Pradesh are included, then the estimated pandemic-related mortality was: 111.6 to 161.0 per 100,000 population for the entire pandemic (through June 30, 2021), corresponding with a mortality range of 1.51 to 2.18 million people perishing during the pandemic in India..

Rather than reconciling anomolies, throw all the data out. Almost as bad as changing the definitions of immunity\immunization\vaccines to fit your current results.

[Pelham]

So did you actually think that you’re the kook that I was referring to? You’re not. That one is an instigator who knows it’s all fake, whereas you’re a true believer.

[stylin19a]

daily clout showing a correction today

https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-misleadingly-classified-multiple-miscarriages/

here’s the sauce ?

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/fact-checking-the-claim-that-44-of

[bagster]

Oh, no. Another ass whoopin'. This just ain't the thread for you, VaxHerd. I bet if you go pimp vax on another thread, you might have better luck. Just hope Grey Whiskers and Stylin don't get wind of you.

[bagster]

So did you actually think that you’re the kook that I was referring to? You’re not. That one is an instigator who knows it’s all fake, whereas you’re a true believer.

Your posts are getting weirder and weirder, Pelham. You're starting to sound like a disgruntled ex-wife. You okay?

[CatHerd]

Because of "anomalies" in Uttar Pradesh mortality data, their data wasn't included in the excess death report.

Perhaps you would care to point out where Korey says this? What methodology he used? What is the difference between including these most populous districts or not, considering they reported no deaths whatsoever? And what do you think it does to the total when you subtract out these highly populous districts?

And considering you tend to see not only higher total deaths, but a higher rate of deaths/1000 of a highly contagious disease in highly populous areas for the simple reason people are crowded together in multi-storey buildings, using crowded public transport, etc., removing these districts will skew the overall number of deaths/1000 as well.

What claims ? and by who of a start date 5/2021 ? Dr. Kory specifically notes 08/2020 start date."

Perhaps Dr. Korey edited his SubStack in the meantime to correct this, or perhaps Dr. Mark was addressing one of the other Uttar Pradesh articles or graphs floating around the internet at the time.

Ivermectin is not a vaccine. Where was it suppose to end the alpha phase and prevent delta ?

Dr. Korey claims that ivermectin is an effective Covid prophylactic and treatment -- in other other words, he claims you won't get Covid if you take ivermectin, and if you catch it, ivermectin is an effective treatment.

Prophylactics are used when no vaccine is available. For example, people who have no natural immunity to malaria use prophylactic drugs to prevent getting it when travelling to areas where malaria is prevalent. There is no vaccine for malaria.

If ivermectin is so effective as a prophylactic, why didn't it hasten the end of the Alpha wave and prevent the Delta wave?

The problem with this is, the first part is taken from "Preliminary Analysis of Excess Mortality in India During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Update August 4, 2021)" (ps. There is an update Sept.2021) and all versions of this report have this disclaimer: "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.04.21261604v2.full-text

Yet you and Dr. Mark are taking it as gospel ?

It has since been published in the highly respected, long-established peer-reviewed American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128677

Dr. Korey's findings have not been published in a peer-reviewed journal, yet you take what he writes in his SubStack as gospel?

Rather than reconciling anomolies, throw all the data out. Almost as bad as changing the definitions of immunity\immunization\vaccines to fit your current results.

Yet this is precisely what you said Korey did in his defense at the beginning of your post. "Not included" is the same as "thrown out". So which way is it?

In the beginning I really hoped ivermectin and/or HCQ would turn out to be helpful. Both looked good in vitro, but then lots of things look good in vitro but end up not being effective in vivo. This turned out to be the case, sadly.

Dr. Mark explained how and why the levels needed to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro cannot be reached in vivo. You will need to scroll back in the video to see that section in the video. He also provided the graphs and slides he used. Both links given here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=124#124

I got Covid so early, before there was any talk of ivermectin or HCQ, or I would have tried them myself.

It soon began to look like they were only mildly beneficial if at all, but I stayed on the fence until we finally got results from large placebo-controlled random clinical trials. These proved that they indeed are only mildly beneficial if at all.

Some Freepers say ivermectin on its own is no use, that it works as a zinc ionophore and the RCTs should have included zinc. There may be something to that. Other Freepers say quercetin works just as well as ivermectin as a zinc ionophore.

If you or others want to take ivermectin, with or without zinc, I think you should have that right. It's an old, cheap safe drug.

[stylin19a]

Because of "anomalies" in Uttar Pradesh mortality data, their data wasn't included in the excess death report.

Dr. Cory didn't say it. You said it...quoting Dr. Marks. I guess I need to spell it out, which I thought I did.

I cited your "money quotes" from your post #124, as they seemd like head scratchers to me.

Dr. Mark also cited research where scientists looked at data for all deaths in India, and found that certain populous districts in Uttar Pradesh had no reported deaths at all for several months.

I noted that the research came from the "Preliminary Analysis of Excess Mortality in India During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Update August 4, 2021)"(for which I gave the link to the article)

Again, using Dr. Mark's qoutes on Excess Mortality in India doesn't do anything to debunk Dr. Cory's report on how Ivermectin was used in Uttar Pradesh.

now, for your:

It has since been published in the highly respected, long-established peer-reviewed American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene:

I still haven't found where that article is peer reviewed. maybe I missed it, as I usually do, in the minutia. I didn't know peer review was required to get an article published in that Journal. In fact, they welcome manuscripts that have been posted on pre-peer review sites...

See here: https://www.ajtmh.org/page/authorinstructions

you and I seem to be more in agreement than not. The problem is, we really haven't been able to get non-compromised data....you come from one place, I come from another

check this out from today:
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdcs-community-level-tool-is-broken%EF%BF%BC/

anyway, keep fighting the good fight with an open mind...

FreeRegards

[CatHerd]

>>>>”Dr. Cory didn’t say it. You said it...quoting Dr. Marks. I guess I need to spell it out, which I thought I did.”<<<<

Ah, it was ambiguous in your first post, as you wrote “they” and it seemed to me you meant Korey had not counted the highly populous districts that reported no deaths at all, of any cause. Thanks for clarifying.

>>>>”I still haven’t found where that article is peer reviewed. maybe I missed it, as I usually do, in the minutia. I didn’t know peer review was required to get an article published in that Journal.”<<<<<

Here you go:

---

“In order to provide our readers with timely access to new content, papers accepted by the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are posted online ahead of print publication. Papers that have been accepted for publication are peer-reviewed and copy edited but do not incorporate all corrections or constitute the final versions that will appear in the Journal. Final, corrected papers will be published online concurrent with the release of the print issue.”

https://www.ajtmh.org/view/journals/tpmd/aop/issue.xml

---

In journal indexes, such as this one, it’s also listed as peer reviewed:

https://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/dis/infoserv/journal/detail/1423.html

>>>>>”I noted that the research came from the “Preliminary Analysis of Excess Mortality in India During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Update August 4, 2021)”(for which I gave the link to the article)

Again, using Dr. Mark’s qoutes on Excess Mortality in India doesn’t do anything to debunk Dr. Cory’s report on how Ivermectin was used in Uttar Pradesh.”<<<<<<

He was using it as a reference to support his statement that there were highly populous districts in Uttar Pradesh which reported zero deaths of any cause:

“The baseline Uttar Pradesh data contained districts with zero deaths for numerous months and were therefore excluded from the top-line model.”

They do go back later and add back in extrapolated data for those districts. This gives you three choices of data sets (1) without those zero death districts (2) with them (3) with extrapolated data to make up for the missing data (in the months when zero deaths were reported) in those districts.

>>>>”you and I seem to be more in agreement than not. The problem is, we really haven’t been able to get non-compromised data....you come from one place, I come from another”<<<<

Good :) It’s true there is no good data for Uttar Pradesh, considering the populous districts that reported zero deaths of any cause.

I was really, really hoping ivermectin and/or HCQ would turn out to be really helpful, but alas ... Perhaps with the zinc, ivermectin does help. It was wonderful when MABs became available and worked like a charm if administered in time.

The place I come from is being firmly against mandates. I believe truth and reason helps that cause and that bogus claims about preposterous things like snake venom, teeny weeny razor blades, wriggling parasites, tiny mechanical octopuses, and magnetic nanobots that enable mind control by Bill Gates via 5G, etc., in the vaccines are harmful to that cause, as well as bogus claims they give you monkeypox, cause instant metastatic breast cancer, cause 44% of pregnant women to miscarry, etc.

You see, I think we need real bullets in the form of verifiable reasons undergirded by solid proof in our struggle against an overreaching government bureaucracy and the totalitarian-minded Dems. Bogus claims are just a bunch of silly smoke bombs and crying wolf way too many times, and hurt our cause.

I will continue fighting the good fight by keeping an eye out for *real* problems with the vaccines (such as elevated risk for carditis, likely elevated risk for Shingles outbreak, etc.), and you will, too.

[Turbo Pig]

First I don’t think k my profession lied about much. I think people didn’t want to hear what was being said and as such made political hay out of something apolitical.

Well, you would be wrong. Your profession, as a whole, either lied, or was complicate in the government lying. You can sugar coat the money the government paid out for COVID diagnoses all you want. Simple fact is that many hospitals ignored a plethora of alternatives and stuck strictly with what the government dictated in order to get paid. Don't assume that just because you are a doctor that you are the only person in the room that knows how hospitals, and more specifically hospital admins, operate. People like me may not be doctors; we do have extensive professional experience and exposure with how the medical industry, specifically hospitals and medical software development in my case, operates.

I'm not conflating anything. When hospitals and doctors toe the government line in order to either get paid, or keep their certifications, they ARE one in the same for all practical purposes. The "truth" is that while state governments were sticking COVID patients in to nursing home, the medical industry was quiet. The CDC lied to people about PPE. Go ahead, lecture the guy that ran the technical side of fit testing and assisted in administering it for over a decade at a major Lvl 1 Trauma center, as well as having to work in areas where it was required how PPE works. Then post the letter you have written to the manufacturers admonishing them for stating, right on the box, how surgical masks don't work the way the CDC says they do. It has changed definitions, multiple times, in order to fit it's narrative. Go ahead and tell me it hasn't. Finally, it has quietly rolled out advisories that contradict what it stated in the past. All the while all but a handful of doctors and hospital administrators kept their mouths shut.

People deserved more and better from your profession as a whole, and they were failed miserably. It is culpable. In closing, you, sir, are just as culpable in the same way as the "good" FBI agents Hannity is always telling us about.

[CatHerd]

I noted the corrections in my #198, but when I checked The Naked Emperor at that time, he had all but the first two paragraphs behind a paywall, so I appreciate your break at my it up again:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=198#198

The Naked Emperor does not “show his work” to demonstrate how he arrived at his conclusions, nor does he show the pages/tables he consulted, so we have no way of way of judging whether he, too, made errors.

Also, as his commenter “The Beach Is My Bliss” noted, (”Going methodically through the 3645 pages” Lol, okay), does he really expect us to believe he has gone “methodically through the 3645 pages”???

Phil Kerpen, the other source cited in the correction, does show his work and reproduce the tables for us:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html

[CatHerd]

Ugh, dadgum spellchecker. “ break at my it up” = “bringing”

[stylin19a]

thanks. Kerpen was also noted in the corrections section in the daily clout article.

[gas_dr]

Well. That’s a bit of a stretch.
I know how hospital admins work as well. Having worked in one i well understand that side is the table. You really don’t understand the payment system and how and what was applied. There are still people running around saying there was higher payment for using versed. I took a deep dive through r the payment rules. That is an abject lie. There is more payment for vented patients as a function of DRG which is true for every DRG. It doesn’t mean we three people on vents for S and G.

As for the remainder id your screed. Fine. Since you appear to work in software, then are also culpable for every bug in every system and every crash everywhere. You see, you too are like the good FBI agents just like Hannity said. Just playing by your rules, sport.

The fact is you made quite a lot of bad and flaws assumptions in your rant that are either incorrect or Intentional misdirection. You are just plain wrong. Where you will admit it or not.

[Pelham]

“You okay?”

I’m fine and highly entertained by the fantasies of FR’s Thorazine social club.

Just when I think that maximum kookdom has been achieved they manage to outdo their previous efforts.

[Pelham]

“I got Covid so early, before there was any talk of ivermectin or HCQ, or I would have tried them myself.”

Early in 2020 I ran across an HCQ study at PubMed from 2005. Actually it used CQ rather than HCQ, but CQ is basically a harsher version of the same drug.

The study was about the successful use of CQ against the original SARS virus. I mentioned it and posted a link to the study on an early Covid thread here at FR. The post didn’t get a single response. When Trump mentioned HCQ for Covid I was pretty sure that his people must have found that same study.

What turned out to be a problem is that the 2005 study was in vitro on Green Monkey kidney tissue. CQ worked great in the lab. But when SARS-2 showed up and HCQ was able to be tried in vivo on humans it didn’t work like it did in the lab. Later in 2020 PubMed had reports of attempts to use HCQ as a prophylactic for medical workers treating Covid patients. Medics taking HCQ contracted Covid at the same rate as those not taking it. But by then the conspiracy crowd had decided that The Real Reason it wasn’t being used was because it was going to prevent the evil vaccine makers from getting rich etc.

[stylin19a]

Thanks.
I remember that got a lot of play here.

as an aside...I think (no proof) that my sister died of COVID in January 2020.
She stopped all treatment. It wasn’t an ogygen problem, she couldn’t expell carbon dioxide. Near as it was explained, her lungs filled with fluid and she drowned.

[grey_whiskers]

Yep, one of the trolls pointed that out to me as well.
Thanks for sending this to me.

[stylin19a]

arg...I was late to the party...I should have kept reading...sorry

[CatHerd]

Oh my heart! That is so heartbreaking! I am so sorry that happened to your sister!

I got it in February of 2020. This woman who had just travelled from New York coughed in my face and another lady’s face in a hallway, so she and I both got quite the viral load and got very sick. My fever spiked to 102.9 and I truly felt like I was drowning my lungs were so full of fluid. It was scary. I have had a few really rotten diseases (including multi-drug resistant malaria), but it was the only time I thought I might die. I took nothing but Tylenol for the fever and suddenly got way, way better after day 3.

I so wish your sister had got better, too. That is just so tragic, and my heart goes put to you.