Posted on 04/14/2022 6:38:15 AM PDT by Red Badger
Artist’s impression of GNz7q (ESA/Hubble, N. Bartmann)
A first-of-its-kind 'missing link' object detected in the early Universe may solve the mystery of the oldest supermassive black holes in existence, scientists say.
The discovery of GNz7q, a black hole dating back to just 750 million years after the Big Bang, aligns with theoretical predictions of what an 'ancestor' to supermassive black holes might look like – and while it's something we've never seen before, there could be many more like it.
"It's unlikely that discovering GNz7q … was just 'dumb luck'," says astronomer Gabriel Brammer from the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.
"The prevalence of such sources may in fact be significantly higher than previously thought."
(NASA et al., full caption and credit below)
Above: GNz7q, the red dot in the center of the inset, in the Hubble GOODS-North field. (NASA, ESA, Garth Illingworth [UC Santa Cruz], Pascal Oesch [UC Santa Cruz, Yale], Rychard Bouwens [LEI], I. Labbe [LEI], Cosmic Dawn Center/Niels Bohr Institute/University of Copenhagen, Denmark)
======================================================================
The period GNz7q dates from is known as the Cosmic Dawn – the epoch spanning from around 50 million years after the Big Bang to around 1 billion years, when the earliest celestial objects were forming, including baby stars and fledgling galaxies.
At some point in these nascent phases of Universe evolution, supermassive black holes also turned up. But when and how remain open questions in astrophysics.
Last year, scientists announced the discovery of J0313–1806, the most distant quasar on record at over 13 billion light-years from Earth, signifying the oldest supermassive black hole ever found.
But where does something like J0313–1806 come from? Or rather, what kind of objects were the evolutionary precursors to supermassive black holes in the early stretches of the Universe?
Theoretically speaking, scientists have some ideas.
"Simulations indicate an evolutionary sequence of dust-reddened quasars emerging from heavily dust-obscured starbursts that then transition to unobscured luminous quasars by expelling gas and dust," researchers explain in a new study, led by first author and astronomer Seiji Fujimoto, also from the University of Copenhagen.
"Although the last phase has been identified out to a redshift of 7.6 [referring to J0313–1806], a transitioning quasar has not been found."
Until now, that is. Fujimoto, Brammer, and colleagues identified GNz7q in an analysis of archival observation data captured by the Hubble Space Telescope. The object looks to be the elusive ancestor scientists have been trying to track down.
Surprisingly, this 'missing link' black hole was found in a comprehensively studied region of the night sky – as part of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) – but only now has a spectral analysis identified what GNz7q's luminosity likely represents.
"Our analysis suggests that GNz7q is the first example of a rapidly growing black hole in the dusty core of a starburst galaxy at an epoch close to the earliest supermassive black hole known in the Universe," Fujimoto says.
"The object's properties across the electromagnetic spectrum are in excellent agreement with predictions from theoretical simulations."
According to the researchers, the host galaxy of GNz7q is incredibly active, forming around 1,600 solar masses of stars per year – or at least it was around 13 billion years ago, when this ancient light was emitted.
The signature of GNz7q's light emission fits the transitional black hole profile due to its brightness in ultraviolet wavelengths (representing emission from the outer part of the black hole's accretion disk) coinciding with an absence of X-ray emission (which would be generated at the core of the disk, but shrouded by the ongoing dusty conditions of the early starburst galaxy from which GNz7q evolved).
As the researchers explain, those characteristics are a perfect match for a black hole destined for supermassive things.
"Its properties are in excellent agreement with the transition phase of the evolutionary paradigm of supermassive black holes," the team explains in their paper. "A low-luminosity, dust-obscured quasar emerging in a vigorously star-bursting host."
In other words, this is what we predicted a supermassive black hole precursor would look like about 13 billion years ago, once its light finally reached us, having traveled some 13 billion light-years to make the trip.
Due to the phenomenon of the Universe expanding, GNz7q – in whatever ultimate, supermassive form it now takes – would be about twice as far away from us today, at a distance of around 25 billion light-years.
One has to wonder, how bright does it glow now?
The findings are reported in Nature.
For dust thou art, and unto dust thou shall return...................
Therein lies the paradox of the Big Bang Theory, the BBT. According to the BBT, the universe is some 13.7 billion years old, give or take a couple of tenths of a billion years. So then, how did the light from GNz7q, travelling at one light-year per year get to us from 25 billion light years away in 13.7 years?
Well, according to the BBT, very early on, the universe simply "expanded", at well beyond the speed of light, to the size at which it is now. Huh? The scientists are saying that it simply violated the laws of science. You must have faith!
Not a problem.
The light you see NOW is where it was THEN, 13.7 billion years ago.
We cannot see it it where it is NOW, which is about 25 Billion light years away............
‘Fire gleaming in the night!
What a welcome sight! Light of a new day—
you’ll bring on many dancing choruses
right here in Argos, celebrations
of this joyful news.’
And you are telling us this is where Covid-19 originated? /s
Actually, while a slightly interesting article, most conspiracy theories have more actual evidence.
When will black holes be found to be racist?
So then, how did we get 11.3 billion (25-13.7) light-years away from it at that time?
Oooh, nice!
Already happened.
Some BLM snowflakes demanded that the name ‘Black Holes’ be changed to something else................
We weren't. The Milky Way Galaxy was still in its formative years, and stars yet to be born and subsequently die and be reborn a few cycles before becoming Sol and its retinue of planets and comets and asteroids. The mass of the MW galaxy was much, much closer to the original Big Bang as was this GNz7q object, and as such was much closer to us. Both we and it are moving away from each other and the BB central location, but not at the speed of light.................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.