Posted on 03/23/2022 3:12:37 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court, was eviscerated by Senator Marsha Blackburn in a series of questions that would have been so easy for anyone to answer just a few short years ago.
If you could travel back in time just fifteen years, it would be difficult to explain the line of questioning that left Judge Jackson stammering and unable to form a response.
simple one. Senator Blackburn merely asked Jackson whether she could define the word “woman
“I can’t,” Jackson responded.
“You can’t?” Blackburn asked. Blackburn seemed to have expected a response that was at least a bit more substantial than that.
Advertisement - story continues below “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said.
And with that follow-up, Jackson had fallen into the senator’s trap.
“The meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?” Blackburn asked.
“The fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
The follow up question should have been, “Can you tell a cat from a dog? Can you tell the difference between Blue and Yellow? What is 2+2? You can answer those questions despite not being a biologist, physicist, or mathematician you should be able to tell me what a woman is. So, are you to stupid to be a Supreme court justice or are you lying because you don’t want to offend the rainbow mafia?”
LOL. That's what happens when a senile Sleepy Joe nominates an Affirmative Action lawyer to the U.S. Supreme Court. Well, at least KJB doesn't have a lengthy history of having a large number of her misguided decisions overturned by appeals court judges. Wait, what's that? She does? Oops! Never mind.
The Laughing Hyena Headboard, upon hearing the news that senile Sleepy Joe nominated KJB ...
Gee, pretry sure the constitution would be even harder to figure out than that. Just hedging for possible x-gender case coming to the supremes?
“Now they can’t even DEFINE “woman”!”
Well, they don’t even know which bathroom to use, so it’s just par for the course.
Are you a woman Judge Brown?
I guess she doesn’t know.
What a moron. This woman is suppose to be the best the Dems have to offer?
KJB: I'm a really smart lawyer. I even went to law school for it. So I'm guessing you're trying to trick me with a question that sounds very simple but actually is not - that's how smart I am. Is the answer 5?
A great post !!!
Excellent question, why has she not been asked that?
OK... wut makes YOU a woman???
She could say she can’t spell the word “law” or she could outright proclaim the constitution to be a null and void dead document, and republicans will still unanimously confirm her. This is all kabuki theater
But do you know if that dog is female or male.??
Sorry...could not resist.
Follow up question: “Will you recuse yourself from any case involving the answer?”
What a weasel.
THAT is a perfect example because it removes this “gender is in the mind” bullcrap that left keeps spewing. We are not talking what is in the mind but the body itself.
KJB: No clue. Never took biology. Sorry.
OK ... why do you eat?
KJB: Who knows? Never took a class in nutrition.
OK ... who are you?
KJB: Your guess is as good as mine. Never studied psychology or philosophy.
OK ... who's that half-awake guy shuffling out of the room who nominated you?
KJB: That's senile Sleepy Joe.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Durbin: BINGO! You're confirmed!
She’s about as dumb as Sotomayor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.