Posted on 03/23/2022 3:12:37 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court, was eviscerated by Senator Marsha Blackburn in a series of questions that would have been so easy for anyone to answer just a few short years ago.
If you could travel back in time just fifteen years, it would be difficult to explain the line of questioning that left Judge Jackson stammering and unable to form a response.
simple one. Senator Blackburn merely asked Jackson whether she could define the word “woman
“I can’t,” Jackson responded.
“You can’t?” Blackburn asked. Blackburn seemed to have expected a response that was at least a bit more substantial than that.
Advertisement - story continues below “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said.
And with that follow-up, Jackson had fallen into the senator’s trap.
“The meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?” Blackburn asked.
“The fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
She said under oath she can’t define a woman? No Repuke Senators are going have some fun with that in their questioning?
I’m not a vet but I know what a dog is.
How can a person who is a woman and does not know what a woman is - how can that person possibly be a candidate to the United States Supreme Court?
Number 1 - hopefully she is lying, and thus ineligible, or
Number 2, she is a blithering idiot.
Either way, enough - bring in the next offensive Marxist candidate, this one gets the boot.
Sounds like she has taken judicial notice that defining woman is a biological question.
Only leftists don’t know the definition of a woman. It’s pretty stupid. However, it is more stupid when Republicans don’t ridicule everyone on the left 24/7 over this and other lunacies.
So now how are we to know if she is the first black woman SC nominee?
The sex is determined by xx chromosome. How difficult is it to say that?
Then she MUST recuse herself from any case involving gender or sex. She has stated she is not capable of understanding the subject.
He should have asked whether she regarded herself as a woman, and why. And whether she had ever in her life used the word “woman” in a sentence, and if so, what she meant by it.
I’m not a fungus but I know what a mushroom is. Seriously, this woman is nuts. How can she rule on any case involving a “woman” if she does not know what a “woman” is?
She’s ready to join the 2 useless ones Obama put on the court
Per the left sex is not biology rather sex is a social/power construct. Referring to biology is anathema. Cancel the demon.
During the Kavanaugh hearings,the dem’s battle cry was “Believe All Women”. Now they can’t even DEFINE “woman”!
“Dammit, Jim! I’m a Token, not a Biologist!”
Does Jackson consider herself a woman? Why or why not?
Good question. Does it take a biologist to know if someone is black, too?
I learned how in the 5th grade.
Biology class. Get your mind out of the gutter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.