Posted on 03/18/2022 5:29:28 AM PDT by Red Badger
The Ford Maverick Is A Great Truck — It's Also Part Of The Problem. Image: Ford
Nobody can build vehicles quickly enough, but Ford’s especially feeling the pinch with the Maverick. The manufacturer paused new orders on its hot compact pickup until the summer because it needs to prioritize fulfilling reservations already placed. And listen — in spite of the headline up there that I’m well aware some of you are sharpening your axes over as you read this, let me just say that I get it. As a technical achievement, the Maverick deserves praise. A small truck that starts at $20,000 and returns 40 miles per gallon is something the world could use more of, especially given the present fuel catastrophe. I’m happy Ford made it.
The Maverick is special because it offers the low starting price and efficiency of a compact sedan, hatch or crossover in a pickup configuration. That’s very exciting for the folks who need a vehicle that satisfies those conflicting demands.
But how many Maverick buyers actually do? A thread on the Maverick subreddit asking prospective owners what vehicles they’ll be replacing with the entry-level truck comprises an assortment of interesting answers, with Civics, Fiestas, BMW 3 Series and Elantras chief among them. There are also full and midsize truck owners expressing a willingness to downsize and save at the pump, alongside folks with small crossovers that are looking for a little more utility.
Pickups are a funny thing, because they’re irreplaceable for the people that actually need them yet actively impractical for those that don’t. The vast majority of car buyers need a covered cargo area, not open-air beds that leave whatever they’re schlepping vulnerable to the elements and necessitate tie-downs so contents don’t slide about or fly away. The vast majority of people also prefer to save money.
Of course, there are cheap vehicles out there that excel at sipping fuel — even more so than the Maverick — are also inexpensive to buy and run and offer all the cargo space the average American requires. They’re called cars, and I have to imagine many Maverick buyers would find their needs met by them. Unfortunately, Ford stopped making them years ago.
Ford won’t admit that the Maverick is designed to fill the gap in its lineup vacated by the Focus or Fusion, but reading between the lines of comments made by Ford’s chief product platform and operations officer Hau Thai-Tang to Muscle Cars & Trucks, it’s hard to arrive at any other conclusion:
“No! It’s not (replacing the Ford Fusion),” said Hau Thai-Tang in an interview with MC&T. “We looked at it as passenger vehicles are getting very commoditized, it’s difficult for us to make money, how else can we use that capital and engineering capacity? We decided let’s play to our strengths.
“What are we good at? Trucks. What do we need? An affordable, entry vehicle to bring first time buyers into the showroom,” he said.
For almost the entire history of the automobile up until about 10 years ago, passenger cars were “affordable entry vehicles” that were great at bringing first-time buyers into showrooms. The most depressing thing about Thai-Tang’s comment here is that Ford was actually competent at building them, when it wanted to be. I leased the last Focus we got here in the States, and have dailied a Fiesta ST for four years. They’re delightful cars. Imperfect, sure, but what reasonably priced transportation isn’t? They were also both products of Ford’s European arm, which is why they were leagues better than the gloomy, tragically faced penalty box that was the 2008-11 Focus sold in North America.
Ford never figured out how to market those cars within their brand the way Japanese and Korean makes have, so it gave up trying. So too did GM and Chrysler, to an extent. It’s depressing yet completely understandable from a business perspective. The Maverick is an especially shrewd play by Ford, because while it’s hard to imagine the margins are any thicker on the low-end trims than they were on the typical Fiesta or Focus, the company stocks only the optional EcoBoost-equipped models on dealer lots. In this country it’s awfully hard to upsell an economy car, but you can upsell a truck without even trying.
And therein lies the undercurrent that I think partially explains the Maverick’s success and everyone’s adoration for it: shame. Specifically, small car shame. Shame that’s driving some buyers to purchase a pickup when they’d be fine with a car or reasonably sized crossover; shame that’s driving Ford to sell a pickup as a replacement for a car. Again, if you need a truck for work or actively use it for pleasure, if you tow (not that the Mav’s even great for that, mind) or you envision dumping dirt or coolers full of fish or a quad in the bed, then more power to you. I hope you love the little guy. He seems wonderful.
But if you don’t need a vehicle for such activities, I know you know that all of the qualities that make the Maverick special among pickups have been available in other, more sensible body styles forever — body styles that we have collectively deemed unworthy as a society. Maybe the optimistic way to read the hype is that at least it’s persuading people who desire pickups to reconsider the size of the pickup they actually need. The silver lining is that the Maverick is getting folks into relatively more economical vehicles all the same, and that’s a good thing. It’d just be better if it didn’t reinforce our deep-seated car-buying complexes while doing it.
I have come to believe that there are two separate and distinct markets. Electric Cars for urban areas and electric trucks for work.
It is presently unknown if either will develop into reality
Tesla is by far the leader in cars and will dominate world wide with smaller inexpensive electrics. Ford has gone after trucks and will dominate there until it’s products are surpassed.
Others will develop electrics but will be bit players for reasons not presently apparent
I wonder why they named it the “Maverick”, The Maverick was a little compact sports car in the 70’s. Is Ford out of names?
Because they are cheap!...............
Pickups have soft and hard tonneau covers to protect items from the elements. They have caps also.
Pickups have more tie downs and possibilities to keep cargo from moving around than most CUVs.
Ford’s move is brilliant. The Maverick is an entry level vehicle that will allow owners to remain in the Ford family as their needs and lives change.
Maverick is as much about brand loyalty than capturing first time buyers.
Yes, it is sad that the Big 3 cannot offer a competitive sedan anymore. But that has little to do with offering the Maverick.
Lastly, the author is too consumed with what people really need versus what they want. In a free country, we do not restrain people to only what they need as decided by an outside group.
In an era where rich establishment liberals tell us that we’re bad people if we drive a truck that can do jobs to run our business or passions, many people under 30 have been brainwashed to believe that personal transportation itself is a selfish, environment damaging sin, I think Ford is opening some eyes with realistic solutions for those who do not want to live in a dense, walkable, planned, multi-family home “smart city” that the urban planners and and socialist plotters expect us all to live in. American automakers have to seize on the advantages of an affordable, useful vehicle for all types of families and communities where some are totally fixated on a 20-something brainwash dream of mass transportation, shared vehicles, hourly rentals that really only makes sense in urban theme parks dorm living.
(Ask them where their kids are going to go to school. Stunned silence)
They will sell electrics to those who could afford them but understand that Americans expect to go where they want to go, when they want to go. Hope some politician runs on that. There are more of us.
The press report on pickups like they report guns. Stupidly. It's very easy to cover a pickup bed. They have hard and soft covers and when combined with cargo managment it's simpler for putting your groceries in the bed.
Auto mfrs recycle names a lot.................
As long as you have a tow package on your Jeep, you can get a decent cargo trailer at Lowe's, Home Depot, Tractor Supply, etc. for less than $2,500 and have way more utility than most pick-ups.
Yes, exactly. Where does this person get off thinking it’s his place to say what other people “need”?
Mine too. Back to shifting with my 1974 Fiat (hand me down from my brother) and my first two new cars, 1979 Ford Fairmont and 1984 Renault Alliance, which was the first car in which I installed AC after market. Finally, I got a new 1986 Thunderbird loaded out. Took seven years to pay the lease and purchase payments and kept it 13 years.
Of all the names in all the world.......if Ford was too lazy to come up with a more unique name for a brand new truck line what else were they lazy about I wonder?
Clever it ain’t.
True!
Same here, but I got a E-350XL and if you take the back seats out, holds as much as a truck, sometimes even more.
With five children and on the mission field it was the best purchase I ever made.
And no tracking devices.
“Sold my Tacoma in 2019 and bought a jeep.....I love my jeep but as a home owner boy do I miss my truck bed.”
We bought both. Both are an EcoDiesel with real-world ~29 mpg.
We also bought a Toyota Corolla for the grocery and errand trips so we didn’t wear out the truck and Jeep. The Corolla gets 36+ mpg and is perhaps the highest quality cheap car out there, well equipped too. We’ll put the miles on that thing. It’s practically disposable, but I bet with car prices going up we’ll do well on resale.
We’re afraid that replacing the truck and Jeep won’t be easy in future times as it was hard enough to find the ones we wanted just last year.
Bring back the Ford Escort in the USA. They sure sold a ton of them when they were making them.
I remember when the Mav first came out, 1969?, I was a paper boy, so I saw all the ads.
$1999 was the advertised price..................
Unfortunately I don’t have a place to store a trailer.....best I could do was pick up a cargo carrier that is rated at 400 lbs. And attaches to the receiver.
Better to have it and not need it, than want it and not be able to get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.