Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who pointed the gun?

Posted on 10/27/2021 3:03:53 PM PDT by A Cyrenian

And who pulled the trigger?

Alec Baldwin.

It's that simple.


TOPICS: Dimensional Doorway; Miscellaneous; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; alecbaldwin; anotherstupidvanity; baldwincontrol; bandwidthisexpensive; banglist; colt45; donatetofr; guncontrol; guns; halynahutchins; hepulledthetrigger; joelsouza; lamevanity; lockhimup; nra; prettygoodvanity; rust; secondamendment; shortbusrider; stupidvanity; theproducer; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: gw-ington

Actually, Yes. The Armorer verifies the safety, then the Assistant Director does, then the Talent does. It is all part of the process.

Unfortunately, when they are rushing, and violating one safety rule after another, this sort of thing can happen... Or someone dies in an auto accident commuting an hour after a 15 hour day, Or any one of many accidents can happen. Film sets can be dangerous if people like the producers don’t take safety seriously.

Item one - No one should be plinking cans with live ammunition in prop guns on breaks. Prop guns are to be kept under lock and key in between filming.


61 posted on 10/27/2021 4:07:17 PM PDT by PTBobW (I am horribly insulted by this new name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
He was handed a prop, told it was safe and was directed to fire it at the camera.

No he wasn't.

He was standing around, practicing drawing the gun from his holster and pointing it at the camera while the director and cinematographer were still setting up the camera.

Nobody was paying attention to Baldwin, as they were all focused on doing their own jobs to set up for the scene.

Baldwin hadn't been "directed" to do anything yet.

-PJ

62 posted on 10/27/2021 4:07:49 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

The person holding the firearm is ALWAYS 100% responsible for the damage done with that firearm.

You can spin it anyway you like; but being an actor, being stupid, being irresponsible, being a jerk, being an asshole, being Alec Baldwin, being any of these things does not remove you from the responsibility of handling and checking a firearm for safety at any time.

Alec Baldwin is one of the VERY VISIBLE point men for the GUN CONTROL LOBBY, you would think that someone in that position would be very aware of the lethal nature of a piece of equipment that was specifically designed to DESTROY A TARGET!


63 posted on 10/27/2021 4:11:31 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

There are implications for insurance coverage in the incompetence of the armorer, or the sabotage of the loadings. Solid chain of custody would have prevented sabotage. If it’s all on Baldwin, why have an armorer and an AD in the chain? To save time? Why not have one or the other come out and hand an open gun and six blanks to AB?


64 posted on 10/27/2021 4:13:39 PM PDT by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Did you see his old tweet, about Liz Cheney?
He said Liz Cheney talks and seems so much like her father.
I wonder if she’s ever accidentally shot a good friend of hers in the face.


65 posted on 10/27/2021 4:14:20 PM PDT by suekas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calljack
Its called involuntary manslaughter.

Failing to check the weapon is not what could possibly put Baldwin in criminal jeopardy. No jury is going convict him for simply being the actor that pulled the trigger without verifying the weapon (after being told it was safe). That single act is too far removed from the primary negligence that caused the death.

Now, in civil court, he is screwed. This was an Alec Baldwin Production. He owns it. He hired both the unqualified armorer and the assistant director.

And there may be more negligence by Baldwin. Much more. Apparently there were other safety incidents, including some with firearms. Less than a week before the incident, a stunt double had fired two accidental prop gun discharges after being told that the gun was “cold” (a "cold" gun is empty, while a "hot" gun is loaded with blanks). Baldwin as Producer did not take action to correct these incidents and ensure safety on the set. Some crew claim they walked out when they were ignored. If THAT negligence added to all the rest rises to the level of criminal negligence, it's possible he could be prosecuted. But failing to check the weapon that was handed to him and twice declared safe is not going to be enough.

66 posted on 10/27/2021 4:17:41 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JouleZ

I work occasionally as an armorer for live theater. Last job was Oklahoma. Actors who don’t need to shoot get a rubber gun. Guns that fire blanks have a blocked barrel with a vent out the side of the barrel. The guns are loaded with the exact number of blanks to be fired and I hand a weapon to the actor before the scene and retrieve it after, otherwise it is locked in my chest. I won’t blame Baldwin yet but it is clear to me that some egregious negligence went on there.


67 posted on 10/27/2021 4:20:53 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

This will go on Ad Infinitum.


68 posted on 10/27/2021 4:27:44 PM PDT by granite (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gundog

A. Trust but verify

B. Never Screw Around

C. Personal Responsibility is paramount [Others could be responsible for their lack of responsible action also, but its an add on, not an excuse for the perp]


69 posted on 10/27/2021 4:29:37 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Critical Marx Theory is The SOLUTION....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: gw-ington

“But is the actor Baldwin also responsible for verifying a live round isn’t in the chamber...?”


I didn’t know that actors and/or other busy people were exempted from basic firearms safety rules. As a nipper I was taught to check the condition of any firearm I touched and not to trust anyone’s word on the matter.


70 posted on 10/27/2021 4:30:47 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

I agree they are deadly, which is why Hollywood employs someone who is trained to do just that.

I know Baldwin is a jerk, but to say he alone is responsible is untrue. I think his production company will settle out of court, and no charges will be brought against him. I think the armorer might be in legal trouble. We’ll see. All around a terrible incident.
(Based on the information we have, which could very well be highly incomplete)

The 4 rules of handling a gun are not laws.


71 posted on 10/27/2021 4:33:18 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

She looks professional and reliable.


72 posted on 10/27/2021 4:45:24 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gundog

That was funny...a monkey with a gun! Those guys ran like hell once he started shooting. Then the monkey raised up his gun in pride of what he had done.

You knew when they gave him the gun, what was going to happen. A least this monkey did not kill anyone.


73 posted on 10/27/2021 4:47:52 PM PDT by Karoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 5th MEB
The ENTIRE REASON for having an 'armorer' is to avoid putting the responsibility on the actor!

I do agree with you, in theory. Sounds right. But in the world of movie productions, the armorer has that responsibility.

I think we BOTH agree that NO PROP GUN should ever double as a live-fire gun used for target practice during breaks.

74 posted on 10/27/2021 5:12:32 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: A Cyrenian

It’s not like the loaded gun was handed over to chimp to see what would happen... but it might as well had been.


75 posted on 10/27/2021 5:12:32 PM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Cyrenian

Baldwin and the crew are liberals in good standing who hate both guns and Trump. Nothing will come of this.


76 posted on 10/27/2021 5:18:21 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Everyone who handled that firearm was responsible for checking it. Especially the person who pointed it and pulled the trigger.

I work in a gun shop and I NEVER hand a firearm to a customer without personally checking it. And then I check it again when they return it to me.


77 posted on 10/27/2021 5:28:39 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (When elections fail, we will either live under tyranny or rebel and throw it off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gw-ington

“But is the actor Baldwin also responsible for verifying a live round isn’t in the chamber in addition to memorizing his lines and acting?”

Yes, he is.


78 posted on 10/27/2021 5:29:40 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (When elections fail, we will either live under tyranny or rebel and throw it off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A Cyrenian

Right there that violates two of the four basic rules of gun safety. The actions of others are contributing factors, but the final link in the error chain is Alec Baldwin. He is the one most responsible for this tragedy.


79 posted on 10/27/2021 5:30:49 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (In time of peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gw-ington
But is the actor Baldwin also responsible for verifying a live round isn’t in the chamber in addition to memorizing his lines and acting?

Anyone, anyone who picks up a gun is responsible for using it safely. Even an actor. Especially an actor who knows nothing about guns. He pointed the weapon at a subject and pulled the trigger. His actions caused a woman to be killed.

80 posted on 10/27/2021 5:32:54 PM PDT by eeriegeno (Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson