[marcusmaximus]

Baldwin hired non union gun handlers because union gun handlers were threatening a strike and Baldwin didn’t want to delay production. So he hired scabs instead.

[marcusmaximus]

[hoe_cake]

Baldwin needs to be knocked off his pedestal. He’s not above consequences. He doesn’t know that. OK, maybe NOW he knows.

[antidemoncrat]

So was the gun loaded with real bullets or did the blank fire too close to the victim? If real bullets, where did they come from and who told the “scabs” to put them in the pistol?

[UnwashedPeasant]

Unions protect hacks.

A non-union worker can be far superior. Or can also be a hack.

In this case, the person shooting the gun was a union member and should have known not to point a gun at a person he did not intend to kill. This is common sense.

[Parley Baer]

I wonder if this happened during one of Baldwin’s known hissy fits?

[IYAS9YAS]

Baldwin hired non union gun handlers because union gun handlers were threatening a strike and Baldwin didn’t want to delay production. So he hired scabs instead.

Meh. Hiring union doesn't mean they're competent, and hiring non-union doesn't mean they're incompetent. In this case, however, it appears at least two people were incompetent.

[rktman]

Again, if, as has been reported, there was live ammo used. Why was ANY live ammo in the set. The craft union didn’t take long to declare it wasn’t a union member.

[where's_the_Outrage?]

And what is the probability that the union members sabotaged the set? The loaded gun could have been revenge.

[Magnatron]

I’m wondering if nitwit was dinking around and trying to be silly. Prop gun or not, it shouldn’t have been pointed directly at anyone at close range, and second, with today’s remote camera systems, it isn’t necessary for a cinematographer or director to be sitting head on with a shooter if the shot required a gun to be fired toward the lens.

[Delta 21]

So Alec is a capitalist? Is that what you’re saying?

The worst insult!

[fella]

All the union guys say it’s a non-union guy’s fault. But it was Baldwinwho pulled thet trigger.

[digger48]

So, the replacements weren’t members of F.A.G.?
.

[cdcdawg]

Alec Baldwin has killed more people than the January 6 “rioters.” Change my mind.

Why would there ever be live ammo on the set for a prop gun?

[immadashell]

Alec the Terrible just got worse.

[SkyDancer]

What were live rounds doing on the set in the first place?

[WMarshal]

Maybe Baldwin killed Halyna Hutchins because he was a jilted lover?

Here are a couple of pictures of Halyna Hutchins and I think most on this forum would be happy to date her:

[colorado tanker]

Barwin should be investigated for criminally negligent homicide. That’s why he’s feeling bad - he’s worried about his own skin.

[Alberta's Child]

Maybe Henry Hyde will rise from the dead and stone Alec Baldwin to death. :-P

[Lucky2]

Proving yet again, Alec Baldwin is nothing more than a Hollyweird phony. I hope he gets charged with something heavy duty.

[dirtboy]

I see Baldwin as 2/3rds liable here. The prop hands are 1/3 liable for using live ammo. Baldwin is 1/3 liable for pointing a gun at someone and not excercising trigger discipline. And Baldwin is 1/3 liable as producer - he has primary endresponsibility for set safety.

He’s hosed.