Posted on 07/28/2021 4:12:44 PM PDT by norsky
Rumble — EXCLUSIVE! Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, came forward with indisputable documentation that should be shared with the ENTIRE WORLD!
The inoculation being referred to as 'COVID Vaccines' is a poisonous death sentence, and nobody should subject themselves to the shots.
Karen also confirms that graphene oxide, hydrogel is in the shot, used for possible tracking patient.
DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'
It isn’t in there.
But how do you know that?
How do we know who you are?
You could bet a robot. Or something.
Are you a cat?
Your unfortunate position is having to prove an unprovable negative. You don’t know if the shots have graphene or not.
Meanwhile, I’m in the position of having the ability to prove a negative: that I never made the claim there is graphene in the shots. I can prove it because my posts in this thread are finite and few.
Here’s your false statement:
“Note, you made the claim that there is graphene oxide.” https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3980064/posts?page=318#318
Now you’re in the position of having to establish credibility. As of this moment, all we can tell is you state the opposite of the truth.
So it seems more likely that graphene in fact is in the shots.
Bookmark.
BTTT
...........
Wow what an amazing resume!. Thanks for sharing this.
He’s a brilliant man. Very special person that the world does not see very often.🙂
WRONG! I did my own research, using web search engines, a skill you apparently think is beneath you. And I reported here what I'd found, and then at that point I knew I agreed with gas_dr and stated that.
"As for Karen Kingston not having worked for the company for 14 years..."
WRONG! I said *at least* 14 years, as soon as I'd found an article written in 2007 describing her as formerly working for Pfizer. Soon after I posted, someone else using a web search engine (you might want to try that sometime?) found an article that she had left Pfizer in 1998.
"... for 14 years is not relevant at all ..."
WRONG! It's entirely relevant to the accusation I was making (and still make) that this article was trashy clickbait designed to lure the tinfoil hats to click on it and make some bottom-feeder a ton in advert $$.
EXHIBIT A - THE CLAIM: The actual title of the clickbait article is: "DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'". The fact that Pfizer is universally known as a Covid Vaccine provider, plus the words "Former Pfizer Employee" are supposed to be taken together as "Aha! A Pfizer Whistleblower. An Insider. Must be someone who just quit or was fired, and is now spilling the beans. And obviously someone who knows what they're talking about ... a research scientist probably."
EXHIBIT B - THE REALITY: She was in sales until leaving Pfizer in 1998. She has as much credibility as a "Pfizer Whistleblower on the Covid Vaccine" as a janitor who retired in 1998 has.
These two taken together, are near 100% proof that this is trashy clickbait. If the headline had stated accurately: "A Woman Named Karen Claims Poison in Covid Vaccine," the clicks and therefore the ad revenue would be a small fraction of what they are. Yet she has as much relevance to insider knowledge of the latest Covid vaccine details as any random citizen.
That is *WHY* it is clickbait, because the wording is a lie-by-implication that's designed to give an aura of credibility and authority to the conspiracy-monger that they haven't earned. You really do *NOT* understand how clickbait is designed? You literally do *NOT* realize when you are being played? Good grief! People who sell Auto Warranty Extensions over the phone are searching for people like you. Try not to let them find you.
"... but you know that you only provided part of what she did..."
WRONG! I quoted or described absolutely NOTHING of what she said. I did nothing more than search out her actual credentials and prove that this was bottom-feeding/trolling clickbait. (And they obviously snagged you on their hook).
Wow! We're up to 4 falsehoods already in your post, and we've only gotten halfway through your SECOND SENTENCE. Sorry, but I'd be wasting my time to read any further. If you actually did say something of value in the rest of your post to me (that I will not now be reading), then that's a shame, but you brought it on yourself by front-loading your post with so many falsehoods so quickly and in so few words.
But in closing, I will quote the sub-headline to the clickbait headline: ".... Karen also confirms that graphene oxide, hydrogel is in the shot, used for possible tracking patient. ..."
If that sub-headline warning us of being *tracked* by the alleged poison still failed to clue you in that this was worthless clickbait, then I don't know what would.
But in your case, I am guessing that that line had the opposite effect on you, and drew you in even further.
Why don't you speculate for us as to how the tracking of us is to be done? I'd love to hear.
At least one thing I'm certain about is that my spiel above has actually made you believe more than ever in this crackpot conspiracy of being poisoned and tracked by graphene, because someone who sold Viagra for Pfizer up until 23 years ago says so, and with creds like hers, you can rest assured she is the Go-To authority on the latest Pfizer insider conspiracies.
Because all the most dedicated conspiracy theorists have this in common: The more foolish they make themselves look, the smarter they feel. The more holes poked in their tattered threadbare theories, the more certain they are of their rightness. The more Lies that are proved in their claims, the more confirmation that they are the ones who speak the Truth.
Because their same old worn-out mantra is trotted out again and again like a broken record, namely: "The flak is always heaviest over the target!" And it's corollary: "What reason could people have to get so frustrated with me and say I'm wrong? The only possible reason is that I am RIGHT, and they are pushing back on me only to try to squelch the truth! Yeah, that's the ticket! Their disproving the Conspiracy serves to prove it! Everyone who tell me I'm nuts is automatically known to be a member of the Conspiracy themselves!"
And thus it must be so obvious to you that I am part of THE EVIL CONSPIRACY! Else what reason could I possibly have to contradict you?
I betcha that's what you're thinking, eh? Admit it.
Even though it is still in the experimental stage, and not FDA approved, they are talking about it being mandated, even for those who have had this so-called Covid-19 virus and their God-given immune system has defeated it they still want to vaccinate these people too. That has never been done before. Where is the science that shows they too must be vaccinated?
In 1901 a deadly smallpox epidemic tore through the Northeast, prompting the Boston and Cambridge boards of health to order the vaccination of all residents. But some refused to get the shot, claiming the vaccine order violated their personal liberties under the Constitution.
One of those holdouts, a Swedish-born pastor named Henning Jacobson, took his anti-vaccine crusade all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's top justices issued a landmark 1905 ruling that legitimized the government’s authority to “reasonably” infringe upon personal freedoms during a public health crisis by issuing a fine to those who refused vaccination. The fine was 5.00, which was hefty back then but was not draconian.
But that is not what they are proposing here. They are proposing that you lose every civil right the Constitution affords its citizens, which is draconian to the nth degree.
Since the CDC, and the NIH, and especially Fauci have told so many lies, and they are outright lies, no one believes what they tell us anymore. Vaccines are big, no, really big business, and those invested in them have a really big financial interest in them.
Fauci has made millions from vaccines, and he once referred to HCQ as a vaccine. He knew that these drugs readily available, inexpensive, and so safe to use that pregnant women, and nursing mothers, can use them. But when President Trump mentioned them all of a sudden the campaign was on to make them very dangerous alternatives. You have to ask why that was the case. Was it because they were truly concerned about the citizens, or was it because they made no money for the pharmaceutical companies which destroys their personal investments? I'll let you chose which one you think is the correct answer.
This vaccine hesitancy is two fold, lying by what were once trusted government institutions, and the promotion of a drug that has indeed caused so many issues for a virus that has a 99+% of survival rate for those who do catch it. Before the vaccine was released many Democrat heavyweights were documented as saying they would not take the vaccine, who have now made a 180, and are demanding everyone take the vaccine. Can you explain how they went from no confidence, to exhibiting total confidence, even with so many adverse reactions?
So, that brings us back to why it is important to fight this vaccination push, and why many of us refuse to take it. You scared worried little people who want to force something on us who do not want to take an experimental vaccine that has caused far too many adverse affects, is a bridge too far. Your attempts to belittle us, only causes us to intensify our resolve to fight harder. You have to ask yourself, why are you so concerned what we do? There are many reports that say those coming down with the virus are the vaccinated, but the narrative being pushed is that it is the unvaccinated who are coming down with it. So, what is the truth here? You all act like you know, but do you really know? All the research can't answer that question, because there is evidence to make both cases. But experience has proven to me that the press are certainly not purveyor's of the truth. Professionals in the medical community are afraid to speak the truth, because those who do, they see them lose their careers.
That becomes even more so when there is evidence that the elites want to take control and also want to depopulate the world to about 500 million or so.
So, hang your research.
Others have also done research, disproving your biased assertion that our using a search engine is beneath us. I as well as others have used search engines to find what we have found. Of course, you falsely must believe that your search engine results are nothing but the truth, while ours are nothing but click-baits & lies.
BTW, ever heard of ADE: Antibody-dependent enhancement? These vaccines sure shows signs that they are ADE.
Let us both realize that they are trying to turn all of us against each other, and that neither of us are the enemy of the other. That we must work together, not fight each other, if we are to stop the destruction of this country, and defeat the forces of evil. Divided we fall, united we will win.
I am going to provide you with 2 videos, as I am interested in what you think. I think you will be quite blown away:
A Manufactured Illusion: Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich
Dr. Robert Malone: The Vaccine Causes The Virus To Be More Dangerous
Where do you get off with this kind of ..... stuff? (was thinking of a stronger word).
I've never advocated for the authorities to "force the vaccine" on anybody. I don't even lean slightly in that direction.
I chose to get vaxxed in March (Pfizer). My wife has chosen to not get vaccinated. I respect her choice. She respects mine. We both read/hear pretty much the same things, but have drawn different conclusions.
Neither of us thinks the other has joined a horde of mindless lemmings. In fact we haven't even come CLOSE to ever arguing about it. (What would we argue about anyway?)
The same with masks for that matter. I've worn them and I've not worn them in public, depending on circumstances. I don't think any government has the right to dictate we must wear them. And I don't "tsk-tsk" at people who don't wear them, and I don't laugh at those who do - even those driving alone in their car.
See, here is your problem: You obviously see conspiracies and evildoers surrounding you everywhere you look, else why would you paint everyone who crosses you with the same broad brush? You saw me scoff at a clickbait article after exposing the true credentials of the supposed "Pfizer Insider / Deadly-Vax Whistleblower" ("Insider" & "Whistleblower" words not actually used, but still deliberately implied by a headline that is not followed up in the article by telling us the true extent of her "Pfizer credentials").
And because you didn't like that, I have automatically proven myself to you to be some sort of an MSM plant, or worse:
Someone wanting to see the authorities enforce vaccines on unwilling citizens.
But if you think you know me better than even I do, then hey, whatever floats your boat. Just be forewarned that I'm likely hiding under your bed or in your closet waiting for you to go to sleep so I can jump out with a hypodermic and inject you with Graphene.
"...vaccine that has caused far too many adverse affects..."
Whoa, stop the presses! Someone has discovered that a certain vaccine has undesirable side effects on some people.
In other news, it has been discovered that a certain medicine doesn't cure 100% of those taking it, and even causes adverse effects on some.
In yet other news, a surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia has not proven to be 100% effective, nor even to allow 100% to come out of it alive.
And in still other news, it's been discovered that neither airbags nor seatbelts will prevent 100% of deaths in all auto crashes. And some airbags may even CAUSE death, especially for those ignoring the dozens of airbag-recall postcards and letters they've gotten for years now.
And as for "far too many" ... who is the authority on that? You, I suppose.
We can look at it from your point of view: 6207 Americans have died soon after taking a Covid vax dose. Giving you the benefit of the doubt that not one single one of them "would have died anyway," but instead we assume that 100% of those deaths were caused by the vax, then it certainly looks like you are correct in your alarm! Omigod! 6207 deaths! That's thousands and thousands who were mercilessly killed by this deadly vaccine! Yes, you're certainly right it is "far too many"!
Or we can look at it this way: 6207 deaths divided by 339 million doses given =
0.0018% - or 1 out of 54616 people died (possibly) from the vaccine.
Given that the best of the current vaccines are over 90% effective in preventing Covid-caused deaths, I find a Death-By-Deadly-Vax risk factor of 1/54616 as something I will not lose sleep over.
And yes, that figure is 90%, not 1% effective, as propagated by the "1% Big Lie" we see repeated ad nauseum on conspiracy sites and unfortunately far too often on FR, by people who can't do simple math, who don't understand or don't care why vaccines are ranked by RRR (Relative Risk Reduction) rather than ARR (Absolute Risk Reduction), and who don't understand the difference between a "Peer-Reviewed Research article in The Lancet" vs a NON-peer-reviewed opinion in the "Comments" section of that same journal.
That's enough ... actually too much ... for today.
If I find time, I'll come back here later and give 3 reasons why I am seeing less and less difference between the Faucists and you "Vax = Massive Govt Conspiracy to Kill Us, Not Save Us" types.
The title clearly stated former employee, and like you said it did not make claims of insider nor whistleblower. So your use of the words click bait were at best disingenuous, and that was my point of argument.
I certainly do see conspiracies with this whole Covid and the vaccines, to that I admit. I even see collusion, which is illegal, of a cabal that waned to further enrich themselves. This cabal consists partly of Fauci, the big pharmas, social media, the press, and politicians, the CCP, WHO, all of whom conspired to fleece the citizens of America and a significant portion of the world of not only their money, but their freedoms as well. If you don't see that then you are not paying close enough attention.
First, the derided anyone who spoke of alternative medicines already available to combat the virus attack before vaccines were even available, that were not only inexpensive, but were so safe that even pregnant women and nursing mothers were treated with them. Instead they insisted that vaccines were needed. Anyone that argued with that narrative were silenced and even threatened with their livelihood if they spoke out against the narrative. The press and social media controlled what got seen and what didn't get seen by the citizens.
There was only one reason for doing so, money, lots and lots of money. In the 100s of billions, with more going on into the future not even realized as of yet.
As for evil doers they exist in very large numbers, and the really evil ones are those who conspire to create a one world government controlled entirely by the elite of the world. If you think that is utter nonsense, you must be living under a rock or something. They are not even hiding that fact anymore. While they have moved up their goals from 2030 (see Agenda 2030) there was a twofold reason for doing so. The most pressing issue was that they needed to remove President Trump as he was interrupting the schedule. So it was coordinated with China to release the virus early, which is why Biden will never do anything against the CCP, to facilitate the steal of an election that Trump was going to win. Once again the press, social media, Republicans, and even courts who wanted rid of Trump provided cover by making claims that this was the most honest and fair election ever, and refusing to even hear cases of fraud that had thousands of people who swore under oath risking charges of perjury if they were found to have lied on their depositions of seeing election fraud taking place.
I never accused you of being anything other than you were making claims that you had no clue as to the validity of the claims you were asserting. Big difference. 🙂
I never pretended to know you at all, but you seem like a decent person. I was again merely dispelling your claim of it being click bait.
Are you even aware that more people have died in 6 months than have died in the previous 20 years of vaccine usage in this country? They stopped the swine flu vaccine after 3 deaths in in 1978. How many is acceptable to die from these vaccines which are not even FDA approved yet, but you can guarantee they will be, and then they will become mandatory for everyone to take. The fact that they seem to lose effectiveness after a short period, may mean a constant Covid shot stretching in to decades or even longer. A virus that 99+% recover from. So again, this is all a scam, and I already told you the reasons for this scams.
While you are correct regarding seat belts and airbags, they do not involve injecting something experimental into your body, nor are they immune from being sued for failure. The vaccines are immune. So, if your wife decided tomorrow to go get the vaccine, and something life changing adverse reaction befell her, or even death, there would be no way to even get burial costs from the vaccine makers. Because she would have agreed that she knows she in an unpaid guinea pig for the vaccines. Doctors who screw up in surgery can be sued though if it results in either permanent injury or death. So, while you think these are all winning arguments you are providing, you are comparing apples to oranges.
The authority on the number of adverse affects and deaths is obviously not under my authority, as I would have cancelled them already. 🙂
That authority lies with the government, but then you knew that.
Your calculations are worthless, because the VAERS database only contains an estimated 1-10% of actual cases. In other words you cannot determine the true extent based upon that source at all.
So that is who is hiding under my bed and who I hear in my closet. Glad to know it wasn't a rat. 🙂
“You could bet a robot.”
Well, I could bet a robot :) my roomba!
Freerepublic post - Fact Check: There is no graphene oxide in the Covid-19 vaccines
the Covid-19 vaccines currently in use do not contain graphene oxide. The MHRA ( Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) told Full Fact “there is no graphene oxide in any of the authorised vaccines”.
It is insane that people believe a story along the lines of “Saleswoman who left GM in 1998 claims that 2020 models have propellers and quack”
Graphene vs. Graphed Oxide. To any here:
Is there a deflection word game going on?
Graphene vs. Graphene Oxide
Deflection of described a novel Alum-based AlO(OH)-modified graphene oxide?
There by claiming there is no (GO) in the so called stick?
I am more inclined to believe independent studies, for which I can find no reason for them to lie.
You see that is the problem when the government has been proven to obfuscate and hide the truth by using the media, social media, and even government agencies to back the narrative that only enriches the corrupt within our government.
Sorry for the late response, and I sincerely hope you understand those of us who have now adopted an almost knee-jerk like reaction to any thing they say. They only have themselves to blame for this.
You are certainly free to accept their narratives, but can you honestly state without hesitation, that they are being honest. I mean after all, they ignore many of the narratives they push on the citizens. For example Obama's 60th birthday party bash where all were mask less and engaging in everything but social distancing.
Have you also not come to the realization that laws are for us, but not for theme? They routinely ignore laws. So why would I believe that they have obeyed that one?
This is not about believing Biden. Trump was the one who accelerated the vaccine development.
The labs all over the world validate President Trump for the vaccine.
The vaccines don’t contain graphene oxide.
Like I said, the government doing so much lying with this virus, especially when Trump was president has now rendered them as being an agency that cannot be trusted.
Listen there is too much that is unknown about this vaccine, and I won't take it regardless of how many people have survived the shot(s). A far greater number have had life changing consequences though from taking the vaccine. More people have died than from all vaccination shots administered in the last 20 years. That is not a real encouragement to participate like a guinea pig in a trial study.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.