Where do you get off with this kind of ..... stuff? (was thinking of a stronger word).
I've never advocated for the authorities to "force the vaccine" on anybody. I don't even lean slightly in that direction.
I chose to get vaxxed in March (Pfizer). My wife has chosen to not get vaccinated. I respect her choice. She respects mine. We both read/hear pretty much the same things, but have drawn different conclusions.
Neither of us thinks the other has joined a horde of mindless lemmings. In fact we haven't even come CLOSE to ever arguing about it. (What would we argue about anyway?)
The same with masks for that matter. I've worn them and I've not worn them in public, depending on circumstances. I don't think any government has the right to dictate we must wear them. And I don't "tsk-tsk" at people who don't wear them, and I don't laugh at those who do - even those driving alone in their car.
See, here is your problem: You obviously see conspiracies and evildoers surrounding you everywhere you look, else why would you paint everyone who crosses you with the same broad brush? You saw me scoff at a clickbait article after exposing the true credentials of the supposed "Pfizer Insider / Deadly-Vax Whistleblower" ("Insider" & "Whistleblower" words not actually used, but still deliberately implied by a headline that is not followed up in the article by telling us the true extent of her "Pfizer credentials").
And because you didn't like that, I have automatically proven myself to you to be some sort of an MSM plant, or worse:
Someone wanting to see the authorities enforce vaccines on unwilling citizens.
But if you think you know me better than even I do, then hey, whatever floats your boat. Just be forewarned that I'm likely hiding under your bed or in your closet waiting for you to go to sleep so I can jump out with a hypodermic and inject you with Graphene.
"...vaccine that has caused far too many adverse affects..."
Whoa, stop the presses! Someone has discovered that a certain vaccine has undesirable side effects on some people.
In other news, it has been discovered that a certain medicine doesn't cure 100% of those taking it, and even causes adverse effects on some.
In yet other news, a surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia has not proven to be 100% effective, nor even to allow 100% to come out of it alive.
And in still other news, it's been discovered that neither airbags nor seatbelts will prevent 100% of deaths in all auto crashes. And some airbags may even CAUSE death, especially for those ignoring the dozens of airbag-recall postcards and letters they've gotten for years now.
And as for "far too many" ... who is the authority on that? You, I suppose.
We can look at it from your point of view: 6207 Americans have died soon after taking a Covid vax dose. Giving you the benefit of the doubt that not one single one of them "would have died anyway," but instead we assume that 100% of those deaths were caused by the vax, then it certainly looks like you are correct in your alarm! Omigod! 6207 deaths! That's thousands and thousands who were mercilessly killed by this deadly vaccine! Yes, you're certainly right it is "far too many"!
Or we can look at it this way: 6207 deaths divided by 339 million doses given =
0.0018% - or 1 out of 54616 people died (possibly) from the vaccine.
Given that the best of the current vaccines are over 90% effective in preventing Covid-caused deaths, I find a Death-By-Deadly-Vax risk factor of 1/54616 as something I will not lose sleep over.
And yes, that figure is 90%, not 1% effective, as propagated by the "1% Big Lie" we see repeated ad nauseum on conspiracy sites and unfortunately far too often on FR, by people who can't do simple math, who don't understand or don't care why vaccines are ranked by RRR (Relative Risk Reduction) rather than ARR (Absolute Risk Reduction), and who don't understand the difference between a "Peer-Reviewed Research article in The Lancet" vs a NON-peer-reviewed opinion in the "Comments" section of that same journal.
That's enough ... actually too much ... for today.
If I find time, I'll come back here later and give 3 reasons why I am seeing less and less difference between the Faucists and you "Vax = Massive Govt Conspiracy to Kill Us, Not Save Us" types.
The title clearly stated former employee, and like you said it did not make claims of insider nor whistleblower. So your use of the words click bait were at best disingenuous, and that was my point of argument.
I certainly do see conspiracies with this whole Covid and the vaccines, to that I admit. I even see collusion, which is illegal, of a cabal that waned to further enrich themselves. This cabal consists partly of Fauci, the big pharmas, social media, the press, and politicians, the CCP, WHO, all of whom conspired to fleece the citizens of America and a significant portion of the world of not only their money, but their freedoms as well. If you don't see that then you are not paying close enough attention.
First, the derided anyone who spoke of alternative medicines already available to combat the virus attack before vaccines were even available, that were not only inexpensive, but were so safe that even pregnant women and nursing mothers were treated with them. Instead they insisted that vaccines were needed. Anyone that argued with that narrative were silenced and even threatened with their livelihood if they spoke out against the narrative. The press and social media controlled what got seen and what didn't get seen by the citizens.
There was only one reason for doing so, money, lots and lots of money. In the 100s of billions, with more going on into the future not even realized as of yet.
As for evil doers they exist in very large numbers, and the really evil ones are those who conspire to create a one world government controlled entirely by the elite of the world. If you think that is utter nonsense, you must be living under a rock or something. They are not even hiding that fact anymore. While they have moved up their goals from 2030 (see Agenda 2030) there was a twofold reason for doing so. The most pressing issue was that they needed to remove President Trump as he was interrupting the schedule. So it was coordinated with China to release the virus early, which is why Biden will never do anything against the CCP, to facilitate the steal of an election that Trump was going to win. Once again the press, social media, Republicans, and even courts who wanted rid of Trump provided cover by making claims that this was the most honest and fair election ever, and refusing to even hear cases of fraud that had thousands of people who swore under oath risking charges of perjury if they were found to have lied on their depositions of seeing election fraud taking place.
I never accused you of being anything other than you were making claims that you had no clue as to the validity of the claims you were asserting. Big difference. 🙂
I never pretended to know you at all, but you seem like a decent person. I was again merely dispelling your claim of it being click bait.
Are you even aware that more people have died in 6 months than have died in the previous 20 years of vaccine usage in this country? They stopped the swine flu vaccine after 3 deaths in in 1978. How many is acceptable to die from these vaccines which are not even FDA approved yet, but you can guarantee they will be, and then they will become mandatory for everyone to take. The fact that they seem to lose effectiveness after a short period, may mean a constant Covid shot stretching in to decades or even longer. A virus that 99+% recover from. So again, this is all a scam, and I already told you the reasons for this scams.
While you are correct regarding seat belts and airbags, they do not involve injecting something experimental into your body, nor are they immune from being sued for failure. The vaccines are immune. So, if your wife decided tomorrow to go get the vaccine, and something life changing adverse reaction befell her, or even death, there would be no way to even get burial costs from the vaccine makers. Because she would have agreed that she knows she in an unpaid guinea pig for the vaccines. Doctors who screw up in surgery can be sued though if it results in either permanent injury or death. So, while you think these are all winning arguments you are providing, you are comparing apples to oranges.
The authority on the number of adverse affects and deaths is obviously not under my authority, as I would have cancelled them already. 🙂
That authority lies with the government, but then you knew that.
Your calculations are worthless, because the VAERS database only contains an estimated 1-10% of actual cases. In other words you cannot determine the true extent based upon that source at all.
So that is who is hiding under my bed and who I hear in my closet. Glad to know it wasn't a rat. 🙂