WRONG! I did my own research, using web search engines, a skill you apparently think is beneath you. And I reported here what I'd found, and then at that point I knew I agreed with gas_dr and stated that.
"As for Karen Kingston not having worked for the company for 14 years..."
WRONG! I said *at least* 14 years, as soon as I'd found an article written in 2007 describing her as formerly working for Pfizer. Soon after I posted, someone else using a web search engine (you might want to try that sometime?) found an article that she had left Pfizer in 1998.
"... for 14 years is not relevant at all ..."
WRONG! It's entirely relevant to the accusation I was making (and still make) that this article was trashy clickbait designed to lure the tinfoil hats to click on it and make some bottom-feeder a ton in advert $$.
EXHIBIT A - THE CLAIM: The actual title of the clickbait article is: "DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Vaccine'". The fact that Pfizer is universally known as a Covid Vaccine provider, plus the words "Former Pfizer Employee" are supposed to be taken together as "Aha! A Pfizer Whistleblower. An Insider. Must be someone who just quit or was fired, and is now spilling the beans. And obviously someone who knows what they're talking about ... a research scientist probably."
EXHIBIT B - THE REALITY: She was in sales until leaving Pfizer in 1998. She has as much credibility as a "Pfizer Whistleblower on the Covid Vaccine" as a janitor who retired in 1998 has.
These two taken together, are near 100% proof that this is trashy clickbait. If the headline had stated accurately: "A Woman Named Karen Claims Poison in Covid Vaccine," the clicks and therefore the ad revenue would be a small fraction of what they are. Yet she has as much relevance to insider knowledge of the latest Covid vaccine details as any random citizen.
That is *WHY* it is clickbait, because the wording is a lie-by-implication that's designed to give an aura of credibility and authority to the conspiracy-monger that they haven't earned. You really do *NOT* understand how clickbait is designed? You literally do *NOT* realize when you are being played? Good grief! People who sell Auto Warranty Extensions over the phone are searching for people like you. Try not to let them find you.
"... but you know that you only provided part of what she did..."
WRONG! I quoted or described absolutely NOTHING of what she said. I did nothing more than search out her actual credentials and prove that this was bottom-feeding/trolling clickbait. (And they obviously snagged you on their hook).
Wow! We're up to 4 falsehoods already in your post, and we've only gotten halfway through your SECOND SENTENCE. Sorry, but I'd be wasting my time to read any further. If you actually did say something of value in the rest of your post to me (that I will not now be reading), then that's a shame, but you brought it on yourself by front-loading your post with so many falsehoods so quickly and in so few words.
But in closing, I will quote the sub-headline to the clickbait headline: ".... Karen also confirms that graphene oxide, hydrogel is in the shot, used for possible tracking patient. ..."
If that sub-headline warning us of being *tracked* by the alleged poison still failed to clue you in that this was worthless clickbait, then I don't know what would.
But in your case, I am guessing that that line had the opposite effect on you, and drew you in even further.
Why don't you speculate for us as to how the tracking of us is to be done? I'd love to hear.
At least one thing I'm certain about is that my spiel above has actually made you believe more than ever in this crackpot conspiracy of being poisoned and tracked by graphene, because someone who sold Viagra for Pfizer up until 23 years ago says so, and with creds like hers, you can rest assured she is the Go-To authority on the latest Pfizer insider conspiracies.
Because all the most dedicated conspiracy theorists have this in common: The more foolish they make themselves look, the smarter they feel. The more holes poked in their tattered threadbare theories, the more certain they are of their rightness. The more Lies that are proved in their claims, the more confirmation that they are the ones who speak the Truth.
Because their same old worn-out mantra is trotted out again and again like a broken record, namely: "The flak is always heaviest over the target!" And it's corollary: "What reason could people have to get so frustrated with me and say I'm wrong? The only possible reason is that I am RIGHT, and they are pushing back on me only to try to squelch the truth! Yeah, that's the ticket! Their disproving the Conspiracy serves to prove it! Everyone who tell me I'm nuts is automatically known to be a member of the Conspiracy themselves!"
And thus it must be so obvious to you that I am part of THE EVIL CONSPIRACY! Else what reason could I possibly have to contradict you?
I betcha that's what you're thinking, eh? Admit it.
Even though it is still in the experimental stage, and not FDA approved, they are talking about it being mandated, even for those who have had this so-called Covid-19 virus and their God-given immune system has defeated it they still want to vaccinate these people too. That has never been done before. Where is the science that shows they too must be vaccinated?
In 1901 a deadly smallpox epidemic tore through the Northeast, prompting the Boston and Cambridge boards of health to order the vaccination of all residents. But some refused to get the shot, claiming the vaccine order violated their personal liberties under the Constitution.
One of those holdouts, a Swedish-born pastor named Henning Jacobson, took his anti-vaccine crusade all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's top justices issued a landmark 1905 ruling that legitimized the government’s authority to “reasonably” infringe upon personal freedoms during a public health crisis by issuing a fine to those who refused vaccination. The fine was 5.00, which was hefty back then but was not draconian.
But that is not what they are proposing here. They are proposing that you lose every civil right the Constitution affords its citizens, which is draconian to the nth degree.
Since the CDC, and the NIH, and especially Fauci have told so many lies, and they are outright lies, no one believes what they tell us anymore. Vaccines are big, no, really big business, and those invested in them have a really big financial interest in them.
Fauci has made millions from vaccines, and he once referred to HCQ as a vaccine. He knew that these drugs readily available, inexpensive, and so safe to use that pregnant women, and nursing mothers, can use them. But when President Trump mentioned them all of a sudden the campaign was on to make them very dangerous alternatives. You have to ask why that was the case. Was it because they were truly concerned about the citizens, or was it because they made no money for the pharmaceutical companies which destroys their personal investments? I'll let you chose which one you think is the correct answer.
This vaccine hesitancy is two fold, lying by what were once trusted government institutions, and the promotion of a drug that has indeed caused so many issues for a virus that has a 99+% of survival rate for those who do catch it. Before the vaccine was released many Democrat heavyweights were documented as saying they would not take the vaccine, who have now made a 180, and are demanding everyone take the vaccine. Can you explain how they went from no confidence, to exhibiting total confidence, even with so many adverse reactions?
So, that brings us back to why it is important to fight this vaccination push, and why many of us refuse to take it. You scared worried little people who want to force something on us who do not want to take an experimental vaccine that has caused far too many adverse affects, is a bridge too far. Your attempts to belittle us, only causes us to intensify our resolve to fight harder. You have to ask yourself, why are you so concerned what we do? There are many reports that say those coming down with the virus are the vaccinated, but the narrative being pushed is that it is the unvaccinated who are coming down with it. So, what is the truth here? You all act like you know, but do you really know? All the research can't answer that question, because there is evidence to make both cases. But experience has proven to me that the press are certainly not purveyor's of the truth. Professionals in the medical community are afraid to speak the truth, because those who do, they see them lose their careers.
That becomes even more so when there is evidence that the elites want to take control and also want to depopulate the world to about 500 million or so.
So, hang your research.
Others have also done research, disproving your biased assertion that our using a search engine is beneath us. I as well as others have used search engines to find what we have found. Of course, you falsely must believe that your search engine results are nothing but the truth, while ours are nothing but click-baits & lies.
BTW, ever heard of ADE: Antibody-dependent enhancement? These vaccines sure shows signs that they are ADE.
Let us both realize that they are trying to turn all of us against each other, and that neither of us are the enemy of the other. That we must work together, not fight each other, if we are to stop the destruction of this country, and defeat the forces of evil. Divided we fall, united we will win.
I am going to provide you with 2 videos, as I am interested in what you think. I think you will be quite blown away:
A Manufactured Illusion: Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich
Dr. Robert Malone: The Vaccine Causes The Virus To Be More Dangerous
It is insane that people believe a story along the lines of “Saleswoman who left GM in 1998 claims that 2020 models have propellers and quack”