Posted on 08/17/2019 9:20:34 AM PDT by BenLurkin
In November of 2016, the sharp-eyed Gaia spacecraft spied a supernova that exploded some billion light-years from Earth. Astronomers followed up with more telescopes, and quickly realized that this supernova – dubbed SN2016iet – was an odd one in many ways.
For one, the star that caused the supernova seemed to orbit far in the hinterlands of its tiny, previously unknown dwarf galaxy, some 54,000 light-years from its center. Most massive stars are born in denser clusters of stars, and it’s a puzzle how this one came to form so far out.
And this star was extremely massive, starting life as some 200 times the mass of the Sun, near the upper limit of what scientists think is possible for a single star to weigh.
The supernova itself also left what appeared to be the signature of two explosions, separated by about 100 days. Astronomers think this isn’t actually due to multiple explosions, but from the explosion hitting different layers of material the star lost in the years leading up to its death and left scattered around it in a diffuse cloud.
The star meets many of the criteria for something called a pair-instability supernova, a kind of explosion that some extremely massive stars should theoretically undergo. Such an event leaves the star completely destroyed, leaving nothing behind. But finding examples of these rare stellar explosions has been difficult, and this is still one of the first scientists have discovered. And even in that rare company, SN2016iet remains an oddball find.
(Excerpt) Read more at astronomy.com ...
Zap Ultra-dense Deuterium with a laser as an alternative.
Not 54 but only (ha, ha) one billion light years away. So this happened one billion years ago.
How far can light travel in one year?
Approximately 5,878,499,817,000 miles. That’s almost 6 trillion miles.
And it took this explosion a billion years to reach us.
Blows the mind, doesn’t it? A lot of the stars we see don’t exist anymore while other stars exist whose light hasn’t reached us yet.
Fusion power is the way of the future.
The sooner we get it, the better.
“I went out with a girl like that.”
Did she have a twin sister? Just ask’in.
“Fusion power is the way of the future.
The sooner we get it, the better.”
Fission is fine, and actually works now. Fusion won’t have clear advantages for a very long time, since the deuterium/tritium reactions all produce neutrons, meaning radioactive waste.
Fission still provides a million-fold improvement in energy density over chemical power, has a plentiful fuel supply, and will be 100% safe in the form of modern reactor designs, which also don’t require water cooling.
One important use of nuclear energy will be in space, including exo-atmospheric propulsion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.