|
Posted on 05/26/2019 12:16:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
CORRECTION TO MY GEORGE WEBB POST:
THE THREE RUSSIAN OPERATIVES NAMED ARE BOGACHEVA , KRYLOVA AND BUTTINA.
It’s become the TV version of the democrat underground.
SERKIT:
Maybe someone already cracked this, but I cannot find a single article that includes descriptions of all five “buckets” of data that will be released. The following are sourced from various articles, but there seems to be overlap....and Bucket 4 and 5 are nearly the same. Is there a definitive description of all 5 “buckets”. Thanks - and sorry I may be late to the bucket party. It’ just been driving me crazy that I can’t find clear understanding of all five buckets.
Bucket 1: The last FISA renewal, and supporting documents, which was signed by Rod Rosenstein.
Bucket 2: Bruce Ohr reports, which are the emails between Bruce Ohr and his wife and others.
Bucket 3: Exculpatory evidence that wasn’t presented to the FISA court, in other words, evidence that would say there was no collusion between Donald Trump and the Russians.
Bucket 4: Emails between FBI and DOJ and others that clearly show that they knew about information that should have been presented to the FISA court.
Bucket 5: The president will begin with with the release of “Bucket 5” documents, otherwise known as exculpatory statements the FBI possessed about its targets before agents went to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to get warrants to spy on them. Bucket 5 also includes transcripts and tapes of former Trump advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page saying that there was no way the 2016 campaign was working with Russians — information that Obama’s FBI and Justice Department did not share with the FISA court.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Hi SERKIT! Will this help?
https://www.magas.us/2019/04/trump-to-release-five-buckets-exposing.html
“...Hannity: “Do you have plans to release those FISA applications, Gang of Eight information, the 302s of Bruce Ohr and others, and the five buckets that John Solomon and Sara Carter — as they call them?”
President Trump: “I do. I have plans to declassify and release. I have plans to absolutely release.”
THE FIVE BUCKETS HANNITY REFERRED TO ARE:
The Carter Page FISA applications (including specifically pages 10-12 and 17-34 and relevant footnotes). This includes all exculpatory evidence regarding Carter Page and others, that were presented to the Gang of Eight, but not presented to the FISA Court.”
All of the Bruce Ohr 302’s, FBI notes from interviews and debriefing sessions, and other relevant documents associated with the interviews of Bruce Ohr and his internal communications. This request also includes exculpatory evidence that Bruce Ohr may have shared.
The unredacted “Scope Memo”, authored by Deputy Rosenstein, that authorized the specific investigative direction of Robert Mueller.
The originating Electronic Communication or “EC” authored by CIA Director John Brennan to former FBI Director James Comey. The two-page EC is the originating memorandum that outlines the reason why Brennan felt operation “Crossfire Hurricane” should be initiated to investigate the Trump campaign (July 31, 2016).
The release of the full and unredacted text messaging and communication between Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe that has likely been expanded to include all communications between DNI James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and a slew of other high-ranking DOJ and FBI officials.
The release of this information will be devastating to the agencies involved and will shake Americans’ trust in their government. Trump promised to drain the swamp and, after the public sees what’s contained in the declassified documents, even the president’s detractors will be thankful he’s done it.
The president then told Hannity why he hadn’t declassified these documents sooner and put an early end to Mueller’s witch-hunt. It confirms our beliefs that Mueller had been working towards obstruction all along:
President Trump: “I have some very talented people working for me, lawyers, and they really didn’t want me to do it early on. … A lot of people wanted me to do it a long time ago. I’m glad I didn’t do it. We got a great result without having to do it, but we will. One of the reasons that my lawyers didn’t want me to do it, is they said, if I do it, they’ll call it a form of obstruction.”
“Frankly, thought it would be better if we held it to the end. But at the right time, we will be absolutely releasing.”
Excellent point!
Mueller: Charging the President with a crime “Was not an option we could consider”
Am I missing something? If they could not charge POTUS with a crime, then doesn’t that mean that they were NOT investigating him? Doesn’t that mean that they had to be investigating someone(s) ELSE????? Otherwise, what was the point of the investigation????
So, WHO was being investigated?
RM doesn’t seem to have addressed that. (Though I confess I only heard bits of it on the radio in between running errands. Gotta listen/watch the whole thing later.)
Funny story. I am 55 years old, keep in mind. That said. My brother in law made a remark after we got our smart TV. He says aren’t you afraid they are watching? What if you have to walk by naked? I said then that will be the last time they look! Bahahaha! Watch at your own risk!
Regardless of what he said, he has to know he’s in the crosshairs for one side or the other.
If he’s a derp, then he’s in legal trouble if he lies or interferes with the Trump team.
If he’s a WH, then his life is in danger from the derps.
glad you found this.
future proves the past.
muellie was getting out in front of declas.
>> it was Ovomit that Mueller was pointing to in that statement
Excellent observation. Even if wrong, that’s an EXCELLENT point and needs to be considered.
Bravo.
That bozo picture is really creepy. The audience looks like a cross between children of the corn and chuckie...
*****666***** posted on 5/28/2019, 9:29:42 PM by KittenClaws (”They’ve got Daryl’s Dad’s car! .....Red Dawn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Hi Kitty Claws!
Apt subject for the post number you landed on with that! LOL!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/pelosi-releases-statement-after-muellers-presser-accuses-doj-of-holding-trump-above-the-law-floats-impeachment/ Nancy being controlled by Trump? Dance puppets! Dance!
If Trump were guilty of some form of collusion or obstruction, it is inconceivable that he did so without involving at least one other member of his administration. If there were such a person, that individual would be subject to indictment and prosecution. The Mueller investigation did not find such a person — because there was no collusion or obstruction.
Another EXCELLENT observation.
Something smells funny about this entire charade. I’m sticking with my theory that team Trump has some reason to drag this out and give the derps false hope. Or maybe more rope to hang themselves.
Short response: Nothing personal but this is not credible.
Longer response: There are 2 basic isotopes of natural Uranium- U235 and U238. The difference is 3 neutrons (235+3=238) in the nucleus of the atom. 3 might not sound like a big deal but is is BIG in terms of making a nuclear explosion. In very high level general terms (the only level I really understand) there are two ways of getting such a nuclear explosion: using "Enriched" 235 or Plutonium. When God made the earth, Uranium ore ended up being deposited with the same proportion of U238 to U235, no matter where it was deposited in the earth. Roughly 0.7% of the ore is U235 with almost all of the remaining being U238(with a trace amount of other isotopes). This is the heart of where the term "Enrichment" is mostly used. The 0.7% of U235 must be enriched to somewhere above 95% to be weapons grade. This is no easy process and Iran and others try to hided their elaborate facilities way under the ground... But it is not a tunnel. Russia and perhaps others have another tack to the same purpose of destroying their ideological enemies, Plutonium based fission. A Uranium reactor can be designed to fertile and then fission U238. When this happens Plutonium is produced. Hence, these are often said to be "breeder" reactors. They are breeding Plutonium. They may also be called fast reactors because the U238 can absorb a neutron at high speed where as the U235 has require the neutron to be slowed down before it will normally fission. What happened at Chernobyl was tragic but it was not a 'nuclear explosion', it was a thermal explosion that blasted radioactive debris around the world. Granted, if you were killed by radioactive debris, it would make little difference to your loved ones that it was not an actual nuclear explosion but technologically there is a huge difference. Different subject but, as huge of a disaster that Chernobyl was, it does not match the commonly held beliefs of the general public of massive loss of collateral life and injuries. Similar with Fukashima. Tens of thousands of people were wiped out in a matter of minutes.... From a title wave... But no one from radiation. Are there places that can not be accessed by the public because of radioactivity? Yes but people should have a high level of skepticism on many of the claims that come out of any tragedy. There is a supringly wide range of normal background radiation around the world and people have been living just fine in some of the very "high" radiation areas. Do I want my loved ones to be exposed to "high" levels of radiation? Not unless it is for required medical procedures but defining "high" is not as easy as some experts whould have you believe. I am not an expert on this but I do know using children to transport tons and tons of Uranium ore is not credible. On top of this is the fact that US ore is not high 'quality'. It still holds 0.7% U235 and >98% U238 but to get the same amount of Uranium that you might get from one scoop of dirt in Canada or Africa might take 10 scoops in a mine field near Grants NM or in Utah or Texas. All right thinking people understand everything is bigger in Texas, but that does not apply to Uranium ore. 😄 The above may not be 100% technologically 'true', but I believe it is accurate (as said in a famous movie once).
Hmm, yeah now I remember reading that. I wonder when this was made public. I wonder about this part, what the CFR etc means.
any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)
If they could not charge POTUS with a crime, then doesn’t that mean that they were NOT investigating him?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There are rules that say a sitting president cannot be indicted, therefore for Mueller to charge him but not indict him and go trial would be unfair, legally speaking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
