|
Posted on 04/30/2019 11:29:37 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Perhaps a good way to counter lies from trolls is to address someone else, or leave To box empty, and counter lies and propaganda that way. Without directing enaging them, but lurkers/readers who may be influenced by them, will read the factual comments.
Commiepukes have no sense of humor. Any “humor” they exhibit is sneer, dirty and profane, or snickering at others’ misfortune. They know not jollity or cheer.
I think you nailed it, a good meme has to have an element of truth to it. Their whole existence is built on lies.
CG
This is a thought worthy of sharing.
Could this be the smiling point you saw?
*******************************************************
I laughed when I see that and I am still laughing and probably will be laughing for the next few days...
Thank you Senator Cruz and Thank You Attorney General Barr!!!
Q
Q
I like dealing with them directly but I may have to give that a go next round. Maybe we'll get less trolls now and more folks who just have questions about the Q movement.
I did have a family member who was made aware of this Q movement the same time I did, about a month after Q starting posting. In the beginning he wanted nothing to do with it but must have remembered some of the things I told him about. With all these things playing out the way it is, he's actually now intrigued.
I hope that is the case with more and more Americans waking up to what is going on with this country. Even if someone is barely following, many of the President's latest tweets outline much of what the Q team prepared us for, and at least be more intrigued about this movement whether they decide to participate or not.
CGato
She must have some TERRIBLE skeletons in her closet because she was screaming pretty loudly. Her hissy snit fit was unreal. It’s obvious none of these dimocrats do a thing for the people in their districts. They are totally focused on taking POTUS down and nothing else.
Thanks! I’ll put this on the mantle.
NOTE: ALL OF THE PARTS TO THIS HEARING REPORT CAN BE FOUND AS REPLIES TO THE JUMPING DINOSAUR, POST 9 of this thread.
PART THREE
BARR HEARING ABOUT MUELLER REPORT BEFORE SENATE JUDICIARY CMTE
[TEXOKIE NOTES/TAKEAWAYS - Not a transcript]
5/1/19
BLUMENTHAL
He thinks history will judge Barr harshly and perhaps unfairly…. Because he thinks Barr is the fall guy.
The letter from the Special Counsel stated that Barr mischaracterized the report and was not forthcoming about the conclusions…”I don’t know if Mueller supported my conclusion.” Barr interrupts and clarifies his own statement at the time of the word “obstruction,”
More lawyer stuff, Blumenthall trying to make Barr look wrong, and consequently the Prez wrong. Barr gives a good answer, and tits and tats with Blum.
A poster with elements citing “Evidence that Donald Trump Obstructed Justice” is held up for the cameras:
The elements listed have to do with:
Conduct in Flynn investigation
Conduct in Comey announcement of Russia investigation
Comey firing
Efforts to fire Mueller
Efforts to prevent disclosure of Trump Tower meeting
Efforts to have Sessions take over investigation
Order to McGah to deny attempt to fire Mueller
Conduct toward Flynn
Conduct toward Manafort (cooperation)
Conduct toward Manafort (influencing jury)
Conduct toward redacted individual (Stone?)
Conduct toward Cohen (influencing testimony)
Conduct toward Cohen (cooperation)
There was a colorful grid to the side of each of these elements and the color key at the bottom. I was unable to make out the details on these. Perhaps it will be shown in later news programs. Or not.
Blum is trying to make the case that Barr’s reputation is sullied. Barr affirmed he had not been directed to do anything on the list. Barr affirmed that he had no discussions with anyone in White House. He didn’t recall providing substantive information on any of the list to WH, SDNY, ….
Blum is leading up to a request for recusal from any of these cases listed. His questioning is so imprecise and ambiguous, that Barr appears to flounder a bit because it appears to my eyes as if he is wondering how to approach the answer. He had been asked if he recalled any conversations with WH or SDNY about any of the cases,,,, and he replied that he did not recall talking of anything substantive. Blum took that as he didn’t recall period, and twisted it to make Barr look bad.
He begins to go over the different cases on the list and asked if Prez lied to the American People -
I’m not in the business of assessing if anyone lied, but whether a crime was committed or not. He schools Blum on not in business in Justice system to exonerate or prove someone is innocent. There is already a presumption of innocence.
Barr affirmed that he did not exonerate the President when Blum asserted that he had done that…. Barr affirmed that he did not find evidence that POTUS obstructed justice. He seemed to refrain from saying “there is a difference.” There has not been a crime and the report is in the American peoples’ hands. We, [the DOJ and my office] are out of it. There is an election coming up in 2020. We need to stop using the Criminal Justice system and process as a political weapon.
[Blum makes it clear that he, as we would expect, remains a JACKASS….. In my considered opinion. In fact, all the dems do, so I’ll refrain (hopefully ) from all such comments which are distractingly obvious.]
ERNST
Speaks of hearing from constituents as she visits with them. The focus needs to be on what happened in 2016, and then to look forward.
She makes the point that “acts of aggression” do not now anymore mean boots on ground, or missiles, etc. What we see now are more subtle aggressions which are not those which are congenitally thought of as “acts of aggression.” Russia, NK, China have performed military actions, but now we are learning from the report they seek to influence the elections of our free nation through cyber means.
She makes the point that the Mueller report is the end of the road as far as the President’s concerned. But it is only the beginning of the conversation about how to make sure we are subjected to the foreign tampering again.
What are the vulnerabilities you have seen and what would you recommend we do to shore up our defenses against this foreign aggression in the future?
B: The FBI has a robust program called the Foreign Influence Task Force. It is working to counteract the kinds of interference we have seen. C Wray has briefed me on it, and I’m very impressed with what they are doing.
Because of the technology and the democratization of the data available, the crudities of interferences in the past are diminished and not as easily detected. Interference is more insidious. It affects our national communications and because of our freedoms, they can pretend to be Americans. HE says he thinks the intelligence community is responding to the challenge and threat. He discussed this with Bob Mueller and the lessons he has learned, and how to dismantle threats.
E: are the big tech companies also pushing back against this kind of foreign aggression?
B: Yes, I think the private companies are stepping up their game and being more responsible addressing it.
E: We just don’t want this to happen to us again…. Nor to [from?] our allies as well
HORONO
Accused Barr to act as the POTUS lawyer instead of being the AG for the American People. She listed grievances she has about the bad actions of Barr and giving the people a misleading impression of his work. Barr refused. The release was before two major holidays and no one had the opportunity to read it. Yada yada. You lied to Congress. [During all this Barr maintained neutral face. Not even disturbed in the least.] You took things out of context. She states proudly that all this is because she voted against his confirmation.
She goes back to Noriega, Iran Contra Scandal, and his earlier really bad behavior. He’s been protecting the POtUS and covering up POTUS misdeeds and Barr should resign. Is the White House exerting any influence on your decision to allow Special Counsel Mueller to testify before Congress and when?
Barr: No.
H: Re the list of 10 possible Obstruction crimes - do you think all the things DJT did are OK? Ex the attempted firing of Spec Counsel?
B and H go back and forth a bit - she does the lawyer twisty thing, and he cites to her the Law…
H: And she says, “So I guess you think it’s OK.”
GRAHAM interrupts stating that H has slandered Barr. [It is a thing of beauty, and as I write this, I suspect by now, many of you are seeing it on the news reports already. ]
BLACKBURN
Brings up the culture that seems to be operative at FBI - there seems to be a seedy cynical culture the arose within a certian group, and they seemed to have the sense they are above the Law.
She says Tennesseans want to see a restoration of trust in government. This culture arose, what is your plan to see to this?
Barr: I don’t think there is a bad culture in the FBI and that the things which arose in 2016 are endemic to the institution. I think the FBI is doing its job. Ex,as Kennedy cited, the FBI did good work in that CA bombing. It IS the premier law enforcement in the world. As far as overreach, I don’t want to judge peoples’ motives and as far as there was overreach, what we have to be concerned about is that few people at the top decided they had in their heads that they know better than the Am. People.
Blkbrn: she is asking about the lawyers in the lawyers on Spec Counsel qualifications.
Barr brings up the point as to how the POtuS had been accused for 2 years of being treasonous. These allegations have now been proven false. To listen to the rhetoric, you would think that the Mueller report had found something opposite.
Blkbrn - her constituents are concerned about how did we get here? How do we get this to not happen again? Am. People want fairness and equal justice under law.
She speaks of social media accounts/ads which had been paid in rubles - is there is a plan to deal with these tech companies? [It was rhetorical, for her time ran out and B didn’t answer/acknowledge to my observation]
BOOKER:
We are at a sobering point/crossroad in US History. He digs and says Barr is putting his own reputation at risk. Barr’s behavior is causing there to be a new normal of lies and deceit and misbehavior. He says Barr is accepting contacts with foreigners which the DJT campaign engaged in. He says Barr is trying to normalize that behavior and is eroding our democracy.
Got specific. Trying to question out of context words of Barr. He, Barr refutes that the Trump campaign sought to benefit from the Russian contacts.
Barr deals with this guy beautifully, but the blow by blow is painful to have to tolerate Booker’s line of questioning.
Booker keeps hammering on the erroneous idea that Barr is trying to normalize bad behavior.
[Texokie break time - more coming later]
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
It was shortly before I posted. So a bit before 5:21 EDT
PART FOUR
BARR HEARING ABOUT MUELLER REPORT BEFORE SENATE JUDICIARY CMTE
[TEXOKIE NOTES/TAKEAWAYS - Not a transcript]
5/1/19
TILLIS
Goes to the list of search warrants, interviews and work that they did. He is saying that the new normal we are finding here is that “after all of this investigation and you haven’t found any conduct worthy of indictment, that you can just bounce back from political reasons and indict somebody.”
He talks of NYT headline Mueller pushed a letter for Barr to release the report’s summary.
Narrative now seems to be: So doesn’t this undermine the AG because Mueller wanted the exec summaries issued?
Goes back to Barr’s opening statement re the need to do the redacting after he had requested the redacting to already to have been done. T asked if Barr had ever consider just release the letter and let the press work on that for 3 weeks. No.
Went over the percentages of redaction.
T makes the point that the data is there, and no matter how you spin it, there is no underlying crime.
They talked a bit about exoneration.
Then T brought up Strozk and Page. He affirms that majority of people in DOJ and FBI are good people. He hopes that they [the bad ones] are being investigated.
T asks about the scope of the Horowitz investigation. Barr says he doesn’t want to be too specific. He did speak with Horowitz a few weeks ago. It is focused on the basis of the FISA. By necessity it does look back a bit from that. I and my people will be working with him.
T affirms with Barr that there was no underlying crime. He is noting the dems are not respectful of innocent til proven guilty.
K HARRIS
Has the President ask you to open an investigation on anyone, yes or no?
More lawyer speak.
H: Did you personally review all the underlying evidence?
Barr: No, we accepted the statements in the report as factual record. We did not go underneath it. We accepted it as accurate.
H: Did RR look at the underlying evidence?
B: Not to my knowledge.
H: Did anyone in your exec off review?
B: No
H: Yet you said to the American Ppl that the evidence is not sufficient to support an Obstruction of Justice?
B: The evidence presented in the report. This is not a mysterious process. We have procecution and definition memos every day in the DOJ coming up and we don’t look up the underlying evidence of them. We accept the characterization of the evidence as true.
H: As AG, running the DOJ, would you, from any US Attorney office would you accept from any of them when being asked to make a critical decision, about the highest office in the land, and whether or not that person committed a crime, would you accept them recommending a charging decision to you if they had not reviewed the underlying evidence?
Barr: well, that’s a question for Bob Mueller. He’s the US Attorney, he’s the one who presents the report.
H: But it was you who made the charging decision, sir.
B: It was my decision whether or not to disclose it to the public.
H: And whose decision was it to decide if evidence was sufficient to make a determination of obstruction of justice.
B: Prosecution memos go up to the supervisor. In this case it was the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General, who decide on the final decision, and that is based on the memo as presented by the US Attorney’s office.
H: [talking over Barr] I think you have made it clear you have not looked at the evidence and we can move on.
H: She ask if he will agree to consult DOJ career ethics officials about his recusal from the 14 investigations discussed by my colleagues is necessary.
B: I don’t see any basis for it. I already consulted with them …
H: about the 14 investigations?
B: About the Mueller case.
H: she asks the question again if he spoke with the ethics guys about him recusing himself from those 14 investigations. She accuses him of conflict of interest.
B: He points out he is not the only decision maker here. RR was also involved. He was approved by the Senate, 94 to 6 with specific discussion on the floor that he would be responsible for supervising the Russian investigation.
H: I’m glad you brought that up….
B: [he talks over her - difficult to make out the point]
H: She is pointing out RR’s conflict of interest. Did B consult ethics guys about having someone with those conflicts in the decision process about obstruction, who was a potential witness to a lot of the things being investigated?
B: His understanding was that RR had already been cleared when he took over the investigation.
Bit of a blow by blow between them here. At one point, Barr rolls his eyes because of the obtuseness of the questioning.
CRAPO
Talks about the letter released March 27. - who released it to the public. Was it an AG decision to release it? The dept provided it this morning. He is asking how the Wash Post got it?
B: IDK
C: went over once more the desire of Mueller to have the summaries of the report released. What he wanted to do is put out everything at once.
He also makes the point about history of leaks. He thinks that Mueller’s concerns were being leaked, and then in that context the letter in which M was detailing those concerns was released.
C brings up the bias at FBI found by Horowitz, but couldn’t find that the bias but could not find that it affected the work product.
How is political bias being addressed?
B refers to C Wray. The bad apples at the top are no longer there, and the Wray is making sure that the bias is being addressed.
C asks, and B affirms that it is wrong for FBI people to leak information for political purposes. B also notes that while some leaks are political in nature, what motivates some leaks are that subordinates may not like what superiors are doing, and so data is leaked in order to effect control up the chain.
C notes that Barr has some investigators looking into that type of thing, and B agrees,.,
He asks B, when did the FBI and DOJ know that the Steele Dossier was paid for by the Democrat Party? Which then served as the basis for Carter Page FISA?
B: IDK
C: Are you investigating to determine that?
B: Yes.
C: Did FBI, DOJ and other agencies engage in investigative activities before an official investigation was opened July 2016?
B: IDK…. Am investigating that.
[Breaking up what would otherwise be a way too long post. More coming. ]
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
No, the smile with Cruz was much later and had an obvious reason. The earlier smile, I think, was in the middle of a Democrat tirade. I can't find it now.
Yes we this country should be able to respond better.
The rest of the world, probably not!
I’ve called them commiepukes for years. Because that’s what they are!
Barr is the man. FF this video to 4:45. Da Nang Dick asked to see some note and Barr told him no.
You are a Giant, thank you.
“a good meme has to have an element of truth to it.”
Needs some humor too, they have none.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
