Posted on 11/16/2018 3:11:33 PM PST by Olog-hai
NASA has accepted delivery of a key European part needed to power the worlds next-generation moonship.
U.S. and European leaders gathered at Kennedy Space Center on Friday to mark the occasion.
The newly arrived powerhouse, or service module, will propel NASAs Orion capsule to the moon during a test flight without passengers planned for 2020. A mega rocket under development by NASA, known as SLS for Space Launch System, will launch the combo. [ ]
Orion and the attached service module are meant to fly near the moon, but not land. Future missions will carry astronauts, with the goal of building an outpost just beyond the moon that could enable lunar landings and Mars expeditions.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
What if you built a station on the surface of the moon? Plenty of solar energy, although making sure sewage was maintained properly is another story, not to mention Oxygen.
I hope you didn’t mean for a moon base to be built on the daytime side of the moon, where surface temperatures exceed 200°F.
Yep.
although making sure sewage was maintained properly is another story,
NASA has been recycling astronaut sewage for 50 years
not to mention Oxygen.
Lunar water can be split apart into oxygen and hydrogen
So the moon ship is not actually going to the moon?
Ladies and gentlemen, the moon ship is now pulling into Peoria. This is the moonships last stop, so please be sure to collect up all of your belongings.
There is no daytime side of the Moon, it rotates just like the earth.
We'd have to fight for it.
I did not say there was a permanent daytime side; I apologize if I mistakenly implied that. However, daytime on the moon lasts 13 days on Earth. Notwithstanding, a moon base that is stationary faces those problems I mentioned.
It does rotate slowly, but the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth.
That’s why we can never see the Nazi Base on the “far” side of the Moon.
It is 13 days of daylight. The astronauts and their spacecraft were okay in the Sun, not to mention solar powered Rovers that operated in the sunlight.
That would mean getting the ice in the craters for Lunar water. Water on the surface would get vaporized and float away.
LSLS actually carry something into space - by 2020?
Bawhahahaha (gasp) hahahaha. So late and massively over budget.
Maybe they can get a lift from Space X
That’s true, but maintenance of a more permanent structure would have to require a high degree of self sufficiency, and the expense to withstand the higher daytime moon temperatures could be prohibitive (what was experienced in space flight was extremely low temperatures, down as far as 454°F).
A station at either of the lunar poles would not suffer from the 13 day day / 13 day night problem.
200°F
A foretaste of future glowbull warming, per Algore? < snark>
What if you built a station on the surface of the moon? Plenty of solar energy, although making sure sewage was maintained properly is another story, not to mention Oxygen.
*ping*
Thanks fieldmarshaldj.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.