Posted on 11/07/2018 10:44:17 PM PST by ransomnote
Proffessional and Amatuer analysts. I pulled the Senate results from 8pm on election night after all counties (except La Paz) gave their initial early ballot report. Please ignore the excel pivot-ness of the whole thing. Enjoy! pic.twitter.com/tSr5yqZeN5— The AZ Data Guru (@Garrett_Archer) November 11, 2018
I am impatient as well. BUT it is all going to be OK.
Way upthread there was something about fishing.
I don’t know much about fishing, but isn’t there a technique wherein you let the fish run the line for a while and then set the hook before you reel it in?
Sometimes if you try and reel in the fish too soon, you lose it.
What a diff a yr makes eh?
There isn't such a thing.
What difference would it make to you?
Are the bad guys getting kinda confident ?
Well, let them. Get OVER confident.
Easier to catch them, and more visible to all.
A good read and generally I am in agreement with the views expressed there. But, as I responded there: even if Repubbies agreed to allow massive voter fraud and abuse, I am not bound by that. As a citizen of this country I have a right to seek legal redress of grievances against my freedom and the sovereignty of my state. So does Judicial Watch; so does ACLJ (Jay Seculow)... any sovereign citizen of this Constitutional Republic.
No, we are being pounded into a mold where our objection to open borders and demands for privileged voting makes us racists, monsters, inhuman. Fine; I am ready to die defending this Republic and the legal right to vote!
The vermin are afraid.
Good.
But they are not bound any more. It’s over!
Mighty touchy, aren’t we?
Huh, very odd.
Can you get that on an iPad, never had it before.
It has to either change the STD deviation or be outside the standard deviation to be proven statistically significant - in this case the acreage for 2018 is sufficiently outside that I didn’t even have to use any real tools - nothing else even comes close. Note this is acreage for significant fires noted on wikipedia - which is why two years don’t have data - no MAJOR fires those years. When I look at total acres for the years it’s the same story (just didn’t have it all typed up pretty like these). 2018 is more than double any other year - and the year isn’t over.
Year acres
2003 99743
2004 39138
2005 24175
2006 41173
2007 94448
2008 86300
2009 56823
2010 0
2011 0
2012 271991
2013 61868
2014 77430
2015 50396
2016 44739
2017 101157
2018 218914
With all due respect, potna, a.) you're not the boss of me, so I won't be told what or what not to do, and b.) What are you talking about? I didn't put any words in your mouth.
I asked you a question. The question was, and is, what do you expect to see reported in ANY format. It was rhetorical. The answer is nothing. You will not see anything EVER reported about NSA capabilities or any high tech solutions to vote tampering.
You should know that. Again, with all due respect, you have to have a little bit of intellectual sophistication to connect certain dots and know some things without being told. Nobody had to tell me that spies don't advertise, for example.
And yet you want it printed in your newspaper and deliverd to your front porch.
when in fact those were words posted by Q.
Refresh my memory on what words Q posted publicly?
And remember. Discussion by posters on this board, 8chan or YouTubers is not Q.
If he's going to say them publicly, sometime soon after would be a good time to put up or shut up.
Like I told another anti-Trump, wobbly poster here earlier, asking Q to "put up or shut up" is the same thing as asking Trump to "put up or shut up. But I notice some people can't seem to make that leap.
Let this sink in. Q delivers Trump's message. Any action taken regarding election fraud, swamp draining, etc has been, is, and will always be, taken by the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. Q is part of that administration.
It's a simple concept, but important. Anyone that has a "problem" with Q either a.) Thinks Q is a Larp, in which case why would you even talk about Q in the first place, or b.) has a "problem" with Trump.
It's really as simple as that.
It would accrue favorably for him. :)
I think I may have identified part of the problem. You refer to Q as "him". We usually do the same thing, but we understand that Q is a team of high ranking military intelligence Officers and others that work for and advise the President. Calling Q "him" is shorthand so we don't have to type all that out every time we refer to the operation/team.
So maybe if you stopped thinking in terms of "him" it would help you understand things better?
Also, it's not necessary that Q "accrues favorably" with you. Many people, patriots otherwise, are incapable of "expanding their thinking" for one reason or another. I could write a book on that one. The Donald won't be able to red-pill every patriot, more's the pity. But it sure would help him MAGA. And he could use the help.
Now, I'm taking you at your word that you're not a "troll" like those other two knuckleheads pissing on the thread, and that's why I'm talking to you in the first place.
And I don't mean to be rude, merely blunt. There are some things that need to be understood.
Good evening.
p.s. Remember, I said "with all due respect" (more than once, so you can't get mad).
Bagster
BBB
Softly, softly, catchee fishee. I suppose so. I am not a very subtle person - nor a fisherman. I have done some trapping, with some success; mostly the trap is found empty.
You seem to be saying that only Republicans can challenge Democrap voting abuses. Maybe so, in practice.
That’s good.
I got porn.
Maybe you just clicked on the wrong open tab?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.