With all due respect, potna, a.) you're not the boss of me, so I won't be told what or what not to do, and b.) What are you talking about? I didn't put any words in your mouth.
I asked you a question. The question was, and is, what do you expect to see reported in ANY format. It was rhetorical. The answer is nothing. You will not see anything EVER reported about NSA capabilities or any high tech solutions to vote tampering.
You should know that. Again, with all due respect, you have to have a little bit of intellectual sophistication to connect certain dots and know some things without being told. Nobody had to tell me that spies don't advertise, for example.
And yet you want it printed in your newspaper and deliverd to your front porch.
when in fact those were words posted by Q.
Refresh my memory on what words Q posted publicly?
And remember. Discussion by posters on this board, 8chan or YouTubers is not Q.
If he's going to say them publicly, sometime soon after would be a good time to put up or shut up.
Like I told another anti-Trump, wobbly poster here earlier, asking Q to "put up or shut up" is the same thing as asking Trump to "put up or shut up. But I notice some people can't seem to make that leap.
Let this sink in. Q delivers Trump's message. Any action taken regarding election fraud, swamp draining, etc has been, is, and will always be, taken by the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. Q is part of that administration.
It's a simple concept, but important. Anyone that has a "problem" with Q either a.) Thinks Q is a Larp, in which case why would you even talk about Q in the first place, or b.) has a "problem" with Trump.
It's really as simple as that.
It would accrue favorably for him. :)
I think I may have identified part of the problem. You refer to Q as "him". We usually do the same thing, but we understand that Q is a team of high ranking military intelligence Officers and others that work for and advise the President. Calling Q "him" is shorthand so we don't have to type all that out every time we refer to the operation/team.
So maybe if you stopped thinking in terms of "him" it would help you understand things better?
Also, it's not necessary that Q "accrues favorably" with you. Many people, patriots otherwise, are incapable of "expanding their thinking" for one reason or another. I could write a book on that one. The Donald won't be able to red-pill every patriot, more's the pity. But it sure would help him MAGA. And he could use the help.
Now, I'm taking you at your word that you're not a "troll" like those other two knuckleheads pissing on the thread, and that's why I'm talking to you in the first place.
And I don't mean to be rude, merely blunt. There are some things that need to be understood.
Good evening.
p.s. Remember, I said "with all due respect" (more than once, so you can't get mad).
Bagster
Too much to repost but I agree wholesale. I agree emphatically. VERY PERCEPTIVE AND ACCURATE. Thanks.
I'm done with you.
“Potna.”
The instant-gratification trolls never comprehend that Trump/Q is not fighting to win a battle, but to win a war.
And within a war there are "campaigns", possibly consisting of many battles and many forms of engagement including psychological. (NOTE: I am NOT talking about political campaigns, but about efforts to achieve important strategic objectives.)
One primary campaign/strategic objective is to eliminate vote fraud, which as Q points out will cripple the RAT Party for a long time. Aside from appointing SCOTUS Justices and other federal judges, no other single campaign will do more in the long run to secure our nation of laws and WINNING THE WAR than securing Voter ID requiring proof of citizenship (and residency, and life) in order to participate in federal elections.
Q-2479 ("WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?") maps out the beginning stages of a path to Voter ID law, albeit a risky one.
I will refer to the following as the 2018 Election Gambit.
In chess, a "gambit" is a series of moves sacrificing a pawn or possibly even pieces in order to gain decisive attacking advantage.
I think we will win both contested Florida races ... but there is risk we do not. We apparently will lose the (NoName machine-backed) McSalley in AZ, possibly a CA seat or two yet to be determined; and, possibly other closely contested House seats, all due to fraud, which unfortunately will never be proven in a court of law.
BUT POTUS AND Q, and Governor Scott and EVERYONE ELSE knew BROWARD is DIRTY. Is it too much to assume that these and other known-bad-actor precincts were CAREFULLY WATCHED, leading up to significant prosecutions and hopefully national outrage?
If prosecutions and outrage ultimately lead to a voter ID law, even if it is after we retake the House in 2020, then the 2018 Election Gambit will have proven successful, even if failing to protect in advance may have cost us some seats.