Q Anon: 09/13/18 Trust Trump's Plan

That’s a relief to know. Treason needs to be the charge, since anything less absolves her from a multitude of crimes and scandals, due to Statute Limitations. Thanks, very much.

461 posted on 09/14/2018 10:17:27 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Thanks for the map. I’m looking at my home state of Pennsylvania. How many of the indictments have the “proud union label?”

462 posted on 09/14/2018 10:17:52 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)

Being unfamiliar with HTML coding issues is not the mark of a “dummy”!

I forgot to mention, all that coding stuff (HTML) does’t work in our private messaging system! Yeah, you’d think I’d mention that before going on and on like that, eh?

In our private messaging system (FR email system available to all users), you’d see all the code instead of formatted text. Also - there’s a bug that we encountered sending large pages of HTML code (example: The Oracle Archives stored in Generally’s profile page. SHOUT OUT TO GENERALLY! THANK YOU FOR MAINTAINING THE ORACLE ARCHIVES! :D)

So we tried emailing that code to each other but it includes web addresses enclosed in quote marks. Sending it through the email added an extra quote mark on the right side of the web address! Yeah. Messed up everything big time until our web designer, Mairdie (SHOUT OUT TO MAIRDIE FOR DESIGNING OUR TABLES!) figured it out. Those extra quotes had to be removed prior to use.

So - maybe you could make friends with some sweet little marks to make decent looking lines to separate cited text from the text you add:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I like the ~ symbol. Not too jarring, eh? :)

I put the cited text above the line, and my reply below it. Just an idea. :)

463 posted on 09/14/2018 10:19:01 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

To: Gulf War One

See above. You will figure out the part you misunderstand.

Have you any experience with military tribunals?

464 posted on 09/14/2018 10:19:03 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

HOO-AH is the Marine cry

Spelled "HUA" it is an acronym, shouted out as an affirmative group response. The acronym stands for; Heard, Understood, Acknowledged.

465 posted on 09/14/2018 10:23:42 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)

To: mo; eldoradude; USMC79to83; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; ...

I was merrily making replies to pings and mistakenly posted this reply to an intriguing theory by mo on the previous thread about Bill and Hillary having had the J. Edgar Hoover files in their possession, - that the Watergate break in was all about retrieving those documents.... and they had completed the set with the 900 FBI files when Bill got into office.

So..... here is my repost of some thoughts I had on mo’s extraordinary scenario. My apologies to my ping list, who have now received it twice:

mo said:
Somehow the whole game of mutually assured destruction hanging over the Repub/Dems the last 40 sumpin’ years has to be tied to JEH. His activities are the only nexus of all that.

Also the ONLY reason for Nixon to take that big risk in the burglary-as well as the subsequent shitstorm designed to keep those files from the public eye during the whole impeachment process. That’s what was on the table in reality

Those files would have gone back to the 1920’s and involved every individual and family of influence in the country for two generations. And it is likely Hillary was “updating them” in the late 1990’s

The CF/CGI scam was probably built on JEH’s grave

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
texokie said:
That makes a LOT of sense, mo. I had heard/read a few weeks ago that the Watergate break-in did have something to do with sexual indiscretions, but the JEH files could really be it. You have fleshed that thought out beautifully into a very plausible scenario.

I’m also wondering... during the Watergate proceedings - Hillary was said to have been fired for lack of integrity or whatever they called it.... do you think it is possible that THAT is when she could have gotten hold of the original Hoover files? And yet, how could she have had access??? And because she had somehow gotten them, is that why she was untouched other than removed? Was that the first time she was majorly protected from the consequences of a horrendous indiscretion? Hmmmmmm..... and.... (see below)
she got into Bill’s orbit in 1970....

OK TIMELINE TIME:

https://www.newsweek.com/fifteen-facts-you-may-not-know-about-hillary-clinton-322353

“According to Biography.com, Clinton was once a Republican, even campaigning for Barry Goldwater in 1964. She switched parties in 1968 and went on to work for Democratic nominee George McGovern in 1972 and Jimmy Carter in 1976.”

So that explains how she could end up on the Democrat Watergate investigatory team. Her tenure on the Watergate team also falls in the time frame of when she was paired with Bill - and before their marriage.

HILLARY DOES WATERGATE TEAM:
(SHE WAS A BAD GIRL)
https://www.westernjournal.com/hillary-clinton-fired-for-lies-unethical-behavior/

“…When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.”
[texokie laughs: “17”??? ]

“Why?”

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality….”

“…The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.”

“The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970….”

OMG! Hillary SWIPED the Douglas papers which clearly provided precedent for someone in office to retain counsel when being impeached. SHE THEN TOOK THOSE PAPERS TO HER OFFICE TO HIDE THEM. SHE WROTE A BRIEF SAYING THERE IS NO PRECEDENT, AND NIXON SHOULD NOT HAVE COUNSEL!!”

OK. I’ll calm down.

So she is reported to have swiped some important papers in order to “fix” a case the way she wanted it. (We have seen that pattern over and over with them, haven’t we?)

Wonder if she was able to take some other papers at the same time as well. How would she have been able to know their location and who had custody, unless a very Large Higher Up enabled her?

Could those files have been available to the Watergate investigators? If so, why??? Were they evidence? Were the “Burglers” successful? Or were they unsuccessful? In either case, one would think the Hoover papers would be not only under lock and key, but would NEVER be spoken of.

If they were available to them for some reason - (again, why? - they are so explosive) - Did some Dem... or GOPe brag that he knew where they were?

She met Bill in 1970. He had been at Oxford 1968-1970.

Could she have been urged - protected by the Cabal/Rockefellers to get the JEH files by hook or by crook for Bill’s rise to power? Could doors have been open to her do so because of her relationship with Bill? Had he already been marked for greatness -yet needed to cheat? Did her crime family background make it seem that she was a suitable partner for him? Was obtaining them a test for her, as well as a key for their life together? Don’t know.... and this is just bald faced Spit N Whittle Club speculation.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/bill-hillary-clinton-years-gallery-1.2393148

In your post, mo, you remind us that Nixon left August 1974.
Bill and Hill were married October 11, 1975, (and as most of us know by now, had their honeymoon in Haiti.)

https://www.theknot.com/content/hillary-and-bill-clinton-wedding-storyWedding

So they married 14 months after Nixon left the White House. Did they start out on their Road to Happiness having been able to obtain JEH’s control papers? Who knows???

And of course, to be fair to the lovely young couple, perhaps Hillary did her misdeed as is described above and left it there. Perhaps she was protected because of Bill. Perhaps the very Large Higher Up generously gave the JEH papers to them for a simple little wedding present, knowing or suspecting how very creatively they would make use them. It’s the little things, you know.

All of this rank speculation may have great meaning….. and more than likely, perhaps not.

Nevertheless, the timing pattern still fits your scenario.

*texokie is dismayed that despite her best efforts, the sweater has unraveled beyond all recognition or ability for fingernail polish to rectify. She lovingly places it in the rag bag*

2,337 posted on 09/14/2018 10:15:04 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2336

466 posted on 09/14/2018 10:24:41 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

You’re not arguing, you’re just contradicting.

467 posted on 09/14/2018 10:24:49 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

HA!HA!HA! Ya’ MADE MY DAY❗️ I’ll go tune in. I am a prolific recording artist. I can push “Play”.

468 posted on 09/14/2018 10:26:26 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)

To: Unrepentant VN Vet

Yes, and HANNITY has tonight blown up my foul mood with loads of Breaking News, with name taking and butt bruising.

469 posted on 09/14/2018 10:42:24 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)

Among the Neon comments was this:

Just spent some time at the new 8chan board, and naw…Naw! This is NOT normie-friendly and NOT Q-centric, and it is HATE-filled. No f***ing way this will ever replace what GA was doing for the movement. No way. Don’t even think about it. I mean, nice thought, but you MASSIVELY underestimate people’s aversion to the degeneracy and hate on 8-chan. People will take one look, and never come back.

We need a normie platform, and we need it PDQ. I strongly suggest some open-source, community-owned forum.

Sounds like we may have some visitors soon.

470 posted on 09/14/2018 11:00:28 PM PDT by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- said by Voltaire, lived by elite Libs)

Having been on Voat for 36 hours, I agree with Neon. I can do 8chan if necessary, but so far, Voat is not a friendly place.

471 posted on 09/14/2018 11:03:57 PM PDT by meyer (WWG1WGA, MAGA!)

I haven’t spent any time at Voat yet. I’ll go on 8chan once I get a private VPN.

472 posted on 09/14/2018 11:05:42 PM PDT by Snowybear

To: Unrepentant VN Vet

I’m not on board with the idea of anyone being secretly detained (in Gitmo or anywhere). That just flies in the face of Constitutional protections for due process and Habeas Corpus. More importantly, I don’t believe President Trump would condone secret courts or tribunals. That is the stuff of tyranny and I’ll never accept that our President is capable of it.

I’m inclined to believe that the DOJ is slow-walking indictments and prosecution in the hopes that they can convince these bad actors to rat one another out and take a plea so they don’t have to actually prosecute anyone. This is ultimate goal of every prosecutor, no matter if it’s at the local, state or federal level. It always ends up looking like justice wasn’t served in the end. On the other hand, it would save our country years of court proceedings and appeals that could easily outlive President Trump’s 2 terms in office - not to mention billions of dollars and years of civil turmoil as citizens take a side in the fight.

This is just my rationalization of what seems like paralysis in the DOJ. I hope that I’m wrong. There’s nothing I want more than to see these seditious traitors utterly ruined and slapped behind bars for a good long time. I’m a true believer in the deterrent effect of severe punishment for severe crimes. The rational side of me is doubtful that will happen.

473 posted on 09/14/2018 11:08:39 PM PDT by torqemada (Those who know, don't say. Those who say, don't know.)

Creating 3 divisions is fine, but they need to add a large number of district and circuit judgeships, and let Trump nominate them. Keep the Senate or that would be a waste of time.

474 posted on 09/14/2018 11:16:25 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

add 52 new permanent district court judgeships and to convert 8 of the 10 existing temporary district court judgeships to permanent status.

That is very good. Gotta keep the Senate, though.

475 posted on 09/14/2018 11:20:09 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

That’s my guess as to what’s happening (or not).

But I also strongly suspect that other players outside of the official government bureaucracy might have info to release. Something clicked a few days back and I wish I could remember what it was that gave me that aha moment. At any rate, I think there *MAY* be some explosive information that has gotten to people/entities outside of government that we might see revealed between now and election day.

So here’s what I’m expecting:

1. Between now and election: some revelations about dirty politicians coming from non-gov sources
2. After election and before Jan 1: maybe some bit players indicted? Maybe some interesting Supreme Court decisions? Some things will probably depend on the election results, but I am betting that Trump/Q have a pretty accurate estimate of what that will be. They probably have accurate polls, not MSM fake polls.
3. After Jan 1: BOOM. Bigger players indicted.

Just guesses on my part. I don’t have a crystal ball. Dang. Also I tend to be over-optimistic

For me, a lot goes back to those 50K sealed indictments. There must be a purpose for them. They can’t leave them sealed forever.

The other major factor is public opinion which is based on public awareness which is based on cleaning up the fake media. We’re seeing more high level media types going down. Moonves and the 60 Minutes guy. That’s pretty big. Maybe we’ll be seeing a lot more of those types of resignations in the next few months. I believe that Trump has “control” of the media. I’m not sure how long he’s had it, but IMO they are following his playbook which includes continuing to bash him. It’s kind of “reverse psychology” for leftists. He is getting them to defend Sessions so that when Sessions starts indicting, the media/left/sheep will have a hard time saying that the indictments are political.

Also, I looked at the 2018-2019 TV lineup and there are a bunch of new shows coming out that deal with C_A, F_I, spying, and a few other relevant topics. Now it could be that they are just responding to current events, but I suspect there is more than that going on.

If I’m right about that, the fall TV season might have a lot to do with shifting public opinion or at least priming people for a shift. It may introduce them to some new (conservative! ideas). Think about how TV prepped people for gay marriage. Gay characters were everywhere. The culture - via tv and movies - was drowning in the gay agenda. Then boom: gay marriage which America DID NOT WANT. It was voted down every time there was a referendum. And eventually after having it foisted on us, popular opinion followed. Or at least that is what the polls tell us.

So I think the biggest BOOMs will come after some facts become known and after public opinion shifts a bit more. I think Trump’s support was far greater than the rigged election revealed. And he is becoming more popular every day. The other side of the coin is in play, too. HRC is becoming toxic even to her own party.

476 posted on 09/14/2018 11:21:37 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)

That was the best thing I’ve read all day.

Snowybear finishes his all natural cigarette, sips the last of his beer and salutes.

477 posted on 09/14/2018 11:23:20 PM PDT by Snowybear

I’ve gone into wait and see mode. I think between now and November is going to be epic for better or worse.

Everything hinges on the release of the redacted [20] pages.

478 posted on 09/14/2018 11:29:49 PM PDT by Snowybear

479 posted on 09/14/2018 11:39:16 PM PDT by Snowybear

Sorry for the ambiguity. That “Neon comment” was not from Neon himself, but from a Neon member commenting on Neon’s article.

480 posted on 09/14/2018 11:42:48 PM PDT by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- said by Voltaire, lived by elite Libs)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794